Rebuttal To Creationists - "Since We Can't Directly Observe Evolution..."

No, they're floating around the internet where anybody can see them. You can't wish them away.

Keep flailing.

Tell it to Google.

Don't be silly. I got those links from Google. I don't need to tell them about their own links. If YOU think they're posting "imaginary" links, YOU need to tell them.

Non sequitur. Caterwauling is a sound. There are no sounds in any of my posts.

Do YOU understand that A → B and A → C are not the same as B → C?Kleinman doesn't. He's repeating an old creationist canard that no science-minded person has ever suggested.Are you laughing at how stupid Kleinman is?

Thank you for demonstrating how stupid creationists are.

Well, you're the one who doesn't understand that A → B and A → C are not the same as B → c. That's incompetent.

If you're hearing sounds, they're in your head. The sounds of my keyboard do not reach anywhere near the border.And your'e still evading the issue. Demonstrate your mathematical competency by explaining how A → B and A → C are not the same as B → C. If you don't understand that, you don't understand either evolution or basic mathematics.

The only numbskull saying that is you.I have tried to explain to you mathematically that what science says is A → B and A → C, whereas YOU and ONLY you are saying that B → C. Why do you not understand that those are two different things? How can you even dare to talk about mathematics when you don't understand such a simple fact of mathematics?

Go ahead and point out anything I've said that isn't true. A fake girl maybe.... Well. Kleinman is the one who won't acknowledge that A → B and A → C are not the same as B → C. So... Kelinman either:
1. Doesn't understand simple mathematics, OR
2. Is too cowardly to admit that he's wrong about evolution, OR
3. Is just a slimy troll who will say ANYTHING, no matter how stupid, just to get attention. There are many people here who are smarter than me. All of them understand that A → B and A → C are not the same as B → C. None of them has challenged me on that simple fact.YOU, on the other hand, do NOT understand that A → B and A → C are not the same as B → C. Therefore, YOU are dumber than me. As I have already mentioned, I don't follow instructions well, so I will say this five times in ONE message:
Kishony and Lenski and Desai, oh my!
Kishony and Lenski and Desai, oh my!
Kishony and Lenski and Desai, oh my!
Kishony and Lenski and Desai, oh my!
Kishony and Lenski and Desai, oh my!(whic is all YOU have posted in 1600 messages.

That' is correct. They don't.Reptiles and birds evolved from a common ancestor. Fish and mammals evolved from a common ancestor.You and your cousin descended from a common ancestor. Your cousin did not descend from you.I have tried to explain it to you mathematically: B descended from A and C descended from A. That does NOT mean that C descended from B.But you don't understand the math.

I'm more of a mathematician than you. You don't understand that A → B and A → C are not the same as B → C. You're getting ahead of yourself. You need to demonstrate that you have an inkling of an understanding of evolution before anybody is going to answer your inane questions.Demonstrate that you understand that A → B and A → C are not the same as B → C and THEN I will try to explain to you how drug resistance evolves and why cancer treatments fail. I have already pointed out YOUR misunderstanding of the math, twice in this post alone. YOU need to explain it before anybody can take you seriously.But you don't, you are a fake.

Because it's something that is understood by every elementary school student. The only person I have ever encountered who doesn't understand it is you.

As I said, you're not ready for that. You don't understand the very simplest basics of evolution, so how could you possibly understand how drug resistance evolves and why cancer treatments fail?Demostrate that you understand that A → B and A → C are not the same as B → C. Then we can move on.