Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 60 (9094 total)
5 online now:
GDR, Tanypteryx, Taq (3 members, 2 visitors)
Newest Member: d3r31nz1g3
Post Volume: Total: 901,622 Year: 12,734/6,534 Month: 17/2,210 Week: 348/460 Day: 17/22 Hour: 3/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Rebuttal To Creationists - "Since We Can't Directly Observe Evolution..."
Tangle
Member
Posts: 8774
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 2.8


(1)
Message 13 of 2383 (894628)
05-24-2022 2:01 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by mike the wiz
05-24-2022 1:00 PM


MtW writes:
Evolution theory's theoretics would mean that we couldn't observe something that allegedly evolved THEN, right NOW.
Just like we can't see the coronation of Queen Elizabeth I right now but still know that it happened by examining the records of the time?
Funny how we can't see the past happening today.
So we couldn't observe a bat evolving because it's an alleged past event [...]If convergence is something that happens all the time as evolutionists argue, why aren't there inbetweens for arms, legs, organs, eyes, wings or fins presently "on their way" to becoming things that allegedly gained those things by evolution in the past?
‚Äč
How do you think we could identify something that is on the way to becoming something else? Whatever an organism has today will be a functioning organ fit for a particular purpose today. What it might become in a million years, we will only know in a million years.
However, we can look into the past across those millions of years and see the changes happening in the fossil record. I'd give you a few examples if I thought you'd actually be interested.

Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien. I am Mancunian. I am Brum. I am London. Olen Suomi Soy Barcelona. I am Ukraine.

"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by mike the wiz, posted 05-24-2022 1:00 PM mike the wiz has not replied

  
Tangle
Member
Posts: 8774
From: UK
Joined: 10-07-2011
Member Rating: 2.8


(1)
Message 355 of 2383 (899283)
10-11-2022 1:07 PM
Reply to: Message 352 by Kleinman
10-11-2022 12:46 PM


Re: Kleinman does not think mutations can be passed down to descendants
Kleinman writes:
And biologists suck at explaining the evolution of drug resistance and why cancer treatments fail. Biologists just don't understand the physics and mathematics of biological evolution.
Why are you wasting your time here a the back-end of Internet nowhere? Why aren't you publishing this mathematics of yours and collecting your Nobel Prize? If biologists have got this so wrong for so long and it's as easy and as obvious to prove mathematically as you say, why aren't you the new Darwin?
We think you're a nutcase and a crank and we have a lot of experience of those here. Prove us wrong, get published in a real journal, we'd all be delighted for you and listen politely at your knee.

Je suis Charlie. Je suis Ahmed. Je suis Juif. Je suis Parisien. I am Mancunian. I am Brum. I am London. Olen Suomi Soy Barcelona. I am Ukraine.

"Science adjusts it's views based on what's observed.
Faith is the denial of observation so that Belief can be preserved."
- Tim Minchin, in his beat poem, Storm.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 352 by Kleinman, posted 10-11-2022 12:46 PM Kleinman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 356 by ringo, posted 10-11-2022 1:14 PM Tangle has not replied
 Message 362 by Kleinman, posted 10-12-2022 10:12 AM Tangle has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2022 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.1
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2022