Rebuttal To Creationists - "Since We Can't Directly Observe Evolution..."

Oh that's easy ... Those fossils can only be found in the minds of Darwinists.Some Darwinists even employ artists to draw identikit impressions of the transitionals they see in their minds, which might end up in textbooks portrayed as creatures that really existed.Darwinist fairy-tales in textbooks ... yep, it's all very funny (but not really).

... a vain attempt to dodge the question.

A gross insult to Kleinman.

That's a bit different, I suppose - Darwinists usually throw bullshit around.

You must be joking. I'm nowhere near Kleinman's equal - he's much, much smarter than I am.

Homer Simpson makes more sense than your average Darwinist.

Great idea. The results would be very interesting.

It seems to me that the science of genetics is still in its infancy. Don't be surprised to find that in 50 years time, geneticists will have a very different understanding of ERVs than they do now.

I don't know how you arrived at that conclusion.

I had my two Moderna vaccine shots 12 months ago and I still occasionally feel ill from them. For about the first eight months, I felt sick, dizzy, short of breath and fatigued just about every day. A nasty experience.

I prefer to believe that humans did not evolve but were created as per Genesis 2:7, about 10,000 years ago.As for non-human life, I think it has been around for much longer than that, as the fossil record and geology suggest. However, I don't believe Darwinian theory describes the process responsible for producing the history of life on earth.

Don't get me wrong ... I'm not anti-vaccination in the least. One only has to look at the numbers to see how amazingly beneficial vaccination has been to mankind.I've had some very weird and inexplicable things going on with my health for decades, which I attribute to my bad experience with the Covid vaccine.

I think Darwinian theory works fine when describing what I call empirical evolution - ie, evolution that can be directly observed in real time - eg, drug resistance.But as for describing the history of life on earth and the appearance of novel organs and body plans, I think Darwinian theory is childishly simplistic and has proven thoroughly inadequate.By "Darwinist", I refer to someone who believes the history life on earth (including man) is the result of a purely biological process that proceeded according to Darwinian theory. So your average Western atheist qualifies as a "Darwinist" (whose devotion to Darwinism is typically total, blind, fanatical and quasi-religous).

Ha ha! Good one! Biology for Space Cadets.Abiogenesis: Knowing how stupendously complex any living organism is, how dumb would you have to be to believe that lifeless mud, by a wild stoke of luck, somehow became a living organism? And that very fortunate organism just so happened to be able to reproduce! How lucky was that?!The probability of that happening is to impossibly small that no one with even an ounce of common sense could believe such a profoundly unscientific idea.
Embarrassing.
Universal Common Descent: How dumb would you have to be to believe that a human and a lettuce evolved from the same organism? Manifest superstition. Embarrassing

I need to re-word that part. What I meant to say is that my bad reaction to the Covid vacc can attributed to my weird health.Thank you for being my friend.