Register | Sign In

Understanding through Discussion

EvC Forum active members: 57 (9173 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: Neptune7
Post Volume: Total: 917,585 Year: 4,842/9,624 Month: 190/427 Week: 0/103 Day: 0/8 Hour: 0/0

Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Author Topic:   Rebuttal To Creationists - "Since We Can't Directly Observe Evolution..."
Junior Member
Posts: 18
From: Irvine CA 92606
Joined: 03-10-2024

Message 2927 of 2932 (917490)
04-09-2024 2:01 PM
Reply to: Message 2926 by Kleinman
02-16-2023 1:57 PM

Darwinism Ends in Ignorance, Poverty, Squalor
The Miserable End of Darwinian Evolution
“There can be no going downhill - species can’t get worse as a prelude to getting better.” – Page 91, Climbing Mount Improbable, by Richard Dawkins
“It cannot be said often enough that Darwinian theory does not allow for getting temporarily worse in quest of a long-term goal.” – Ibid, Page 132
“To say it again, going down the slopes of Mount Improbable is not allowed by Natural Selection.” – Ibid, Page 134
“The fact of heredity sees to it that the accidental improvements found in each generation are accumulated over many generations. At the end of many generations of cumulative finding, a designoid object is produced which may make us gasp with admiration at the perfection of its apparent design.” – Ibid, Page 28
We shall now “gasp with admiration at the perfection” of the apparent design of Darwinian “selection” today.
(Picture of one the many worst slums of Africa - Can't be shown)
Slums are the fastest growing, i.e. Darwinian, human habit on earth today. Worldwide, over one billion humans live in them, 24% of all humanity.
“Going down the slopes of Mount Improbable is not allowed by natural selection.” The billion plus humans living in slums are not going up any slopes other than trash.
Making copies of ourselves “is every living object’s sole reason for living.” – Richard Dawkins
Then Dawkins and his atheist accomplices are all losing the evolutionary battle, and for them, what else is there, really?
While religiously unaffiliated people currently make up 16% of the global population, only an estimated 10% of the world’s newborns between 2010 and 2015 were born to religiously unaffiliated mothers..
By 2055 to 2060, just 9% of all babies will be born to religiously unaffiliated women, while more than seven-in-ten will be born to either Muslims (36%) or Christians (35%). –
We could call this “The Tragedy of the Brights,” as they like to call themselves in smug, pretend superiority.
The least educated of the world are the most Darwinian:
(Graph of least educated countries, in Africa, and their ridiculously high birth rate)
This is in stark contrast to some of the racist and anti-prophetic words of Charles Darwin, whose first book was titled, On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.
“At some future period, not very distant as measured by centuries, the civilized races of man will almost certainly exterminate and replace the savage races throughout the world.” – Charles Darwin, The Descent of Man, Chapter 3
The ten most fertile countries in the world are all populated by what Darwin referred to as “savages” or “dark races”.
1. Niger: 7.27 children per woman.
2. Angola: 6.57 children per woman.
3. Democratic Republic of the Congo: 6.54 children per woman.
4. Mali: 6.49 children per woman.
5. Benin: 6.48 children per woman.
6. Chad: 6.47 children per woman.
7. Uganda: 6.45 children per woman.
8. Somalia: 6.43 children per woman.
9. South Sudan: 6.42 children per woman.
10. Burundi: 6.41 children per woman1. (
The least educated also happen to be the least developed:
(Graph can't be shown)
And the poorest:
(Graph can't be shown)
In conclusion, Darwinism and its atheist advocates in particular, such as Richard Dawkins, married three times and only one child, are evolutionary failures.
Science Books Challenging Darwinism
Intelligent Design – The Bridge Between Science and Theology, William A. Dembski
Signature in the Cell- DNA and the Evidence for Intelligent Design, by Stephen C. Meyer
The Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities, by William A. Dembski
Understanding Intelligent Design: Everything You Need to Know in Plain Language, by Dembski et al
Darwin Devolves: The New Science About DNA That Challenges Evolution, by Michael J. Behe
Intelligent Design: Message From the Designers, by Rael
Darwin’s Doubt: The Explosive Origin of Animal Life and the Case for Intelligent Design, by Stephen C. Meyer
Understanding Intelligent Design: Everything You Need to Know in Plain Language by William A. Dembski
Undeniable, by Douglas Axe
Brilliant Creations – The Wonder of Nature and Life, by John Phillip Jaeger

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2926 by Kleinman, posted 02-16-2023 1:57 PM Kleinman has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 2928 by Tanypteryx, posted 04-09-2024 2:29 PM ChemEngineer has not replied
 Message 2929 by ChemEngineer, posted 04-09-2024 2:36 PM ChemEngineer has not replied
 Message 2932 by Admin, posted 04-09-2024 3:54 PM ChemEngineer has not replied

Junior Member
Posts: 18
From: Irvine CA 92606
Joined: 03-10-2024

Message 2929 of 2932 (917494)
04-09-2024 2:36 PM
Reply to: Message 2927 by ChemEngineer
04-09-2024 2:01 PM

Re: Darwinism Ends in Ignorance, Poverty, Squalor
I quoted a website on slums and poverty. Whether a billion people living in squalor is 12% or 24% is really quite irrelevant when you consider how many a billion poor humans is.
But you're caught up in your own pseudo-intellectualism and if something doesn't fit with your political views, you can find a way to dismiss it and show everyone how much smarter you are than others.
Here is the website I created to show others how the poorest people on earth live:
The Miserable End of Darwinism
It's informative to most people if not you, Mister Dunning-Kruger.
The insuperable statistics of original protein synthesis are an absolute refutation of Darwinism.
Thousands of scientists and scholars have published papers, books and videos refuting your religious cult of Darwinism. A small sample of their comments and facts can be reviewed here:
A>B>C>D is not science, it is unintelligent | A topnotch site
As to your bottom feeder:
The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq

Why should anyone debate someone who doesn't know the subject? -- AZPaul3
Medical doctors "know the subject" and they kill 250,000 to 400,000 patients each year through malpractice. (Source: Mayo Clinic)
As to the "scientific method" you cite so confidently, Ernst Haeckel drew fraudulent pictures of various embryos 150 years ago and they were reproduced and quoted "scientifically" into the 21st Century.
"A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it" - Max Planck (winner of the 1918 Nobel Prize in physics for quantum theory )
If we all worked on the assumption that what is accepted as true is really true, there would be little hope of advance. - Orville Wright

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2927 by ChemEngineer, posted 04-09-2024 2:01 PM ChemEngineer has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 2930 by Taq, posted 04-09-2024 3:17 PM ChemEngineer has not replied
 Message 2931 by Tanypteryx, posted 04-09-2024 3:42 PM ChemEngineer has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:

Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024