Rebuttal To Creationists - "Since We Can't Directly Observe Evolution..."

Why should I do your homework for you?

I call them "pork sweepings".Disclaimer: Coming from a German background, I practically live on sausage... and I'm still alive.My brother used to say we couldn't afford real Spam; we only got artificial Spam. Apparently it's unusually popular in Hawaii: 9 Reasons Why Spam Became Hawaii’s Most Beloved FoodAnd now, back to Kishony, Lenski and Desai.
​

Now you're just being dishonest. You can't get along in today's world without using Google and now you expect us to believe that you think Google returns fake links? Kleinman is going to explain to us why he thinks A → B and A → C are the same as B → C.

And WE are waiting for YOU to explain how sexual replicators figure into asexual reproduction.

The DNA evidence (both empirical AND experimental, at the same time, no less) shows that UCD not only IS possible but also IS.

Ooh! Ooh! One of my cousins was married to a guy whose father was a General in the German army during WW2; he was a division commander, a recipient of the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross, who was fired for refusing to put the Hitler Youth in the front line.Kishony, Lenski, Desai. Amen.

They're very real and any fool can find them - except you. You're just flailing. Clearly not. He does. And so does everybody else who has looked at it honestly. There is no lack of transitional fossils. That has nothing to do with transitional fossils. The plethora of transitional fossils is enough evidence in itself to demonstrate UCD. So is the DNA evidence. So is the nested hierarchy based on gross anatomy. Why don't you look them up yourself? Any schoolboy can. A German General whom I never met? Maybe not. But to become a General, he must have been smart enough to accept evolution.

You're flailing because you refuse to look at those links.

You're flailing because you refuse to look at links that clearly do exist - millions of them.To stop flailing, you need to look at those links an d refute them.

He doesn't need them because he already knows why cancer treatments fail, as you admit. He may have learned why cancer treatments fail from some of the very links that you claim do not exist.You're not only willfully ignorant; you're also willfully blind. I was going to say you're like an infant playing peekaboo - if he can't see it, it isn't there - but at least the infant grows out of it. You likely never will.

That would confirm my point.And I'll give him HIS assignment right back: A → B and so on.

But you ARE wrong about that. Nobody thinks that. That is NOT what evolution concludes.Evolution concludes that reptiles and birds evolved from a common ancestor. They are cousins with the same grandparents. Fish and mammals evolved from a different common ancestor. They are also cousins with a different set of grandparents.And the two sets of grandparents are also cousins with their own common grandparents.Universal common descent is demonstrated by the nested hierarchy (derived from gross anatomy) and confirmed by DNA. That's the reality. There's no getting around it.You can't trump reality with mathematics.

That's a lie.There are plenty of links. Kleinman is afraid to look at them because he knows there is NOTHING on the Internet that supports his nonsense. He supports himself. Nobody else does.

Yes, you may be having hallucinations. That would explain your blindness to reality.

That's the problem with mental illness. It often makes the "sufferer" feel better . If you have a sore foot, you go to the doctor to make it feel better - but if you're already euphoric, why would you?Kleinman is already feeling pretty good about himself, at least on the surface. Deep down, there may be a lot of turmoil that will cause him to crash eventually.