Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Biblical Tall Tales
DorfMan
Member (Idle past 6111 days)
Posts: 282
From: New York
Joined: 09-08-2005


Message 9 of 302 (274381)
12-31-2005 11:27 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Nuggin
12-30-2005 11:14 AM


Re: Giants?
quote:
Biblical accounts of Goliath puts him at over 9 ft. all - clearly gigantic
There was an accident on the corner of Main and Walnut. Twenty people witnessed the mess. Twenty people gave their account of what they saw. Twenty different stories, about the same accident. Twenty descriptions of the people involved in the accident, all different.
Tell me, does it negate the event?
Giants or no giants, the plan of salvation is straight from Adam to Christ.
Most Christians build their life on it.
Some Christians are drawn into and quibble over incidentals.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Nuggin, posted 12-30-2005 11:14 AM Nuggin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by Discreet Label, posted 12-31-2005 3:52 PM DorfMan has replied
 Message 11 by NosyNed, posted 12-31-2005 4:00 PM DorfMan has replied
 Message 12 by Nuggin, posted 12-31-2005 4:19 PM DorfMan has replied

DorfMan
Member (Idle past 6111 days)
Posts: 282
From: New York
Joined: 09-08-2005


Message 17 of 302 (274629)
01-01-2006 11:23 AM
Reply to: Message 10 by Discreet Label
12-31-2005 3:52 PM


Re: Giants?
quote:
Its even more strained for those who believe the bible is the innerrant word of God because (as demonstrated by the number of threads about it on this particular forum) which bible is to be believed?
Which word of God is errant? It is the word of God allowed for contention. Not the book(s)holding it. He promised a saviour, the saviour came. Other promises are still outstanding. So?
A Christian is not threatened by counter theories, provided he accepts his plan is one as well. There are many denomination which operate through instilling fear in the believer. It is to their advantage to do so. Financial, mostly. The dumb ox behavior is for convenience and too lazy to look at the myriad gifts through science, the beauty, etal. Science cannot and will not delete God, it needs him.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by Discreet Label, posted 12-31-2005 3:52 PM Discreet Label has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by Nuggin, posted 01-01-2006 11:48 AM DorfMan has not replied
 Message 53 by randman, posted 01-01-2006 5:10 PM DorfMan has replied

DorfMan
Member (Idle past 6111 days)
Posts: 282
From: New York
Joined: 09-08-2005


Message 20 of 302 (274632)
01-01-2006 11:42 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by NosyNed
12-31-2005 4:00 PM


Re: Quibbling
quote:
Some Christians are drawn into and quibble over incidentals.
Some Christians insist that every incidental is crucial to their faith. That if the Bible is not "literally" and "completely" true then their faith is somehow damaged. That is part of the point of this thread.
You are, then, one who agrees that the Bible does not have to be and is not literally true and not 100 % accurate.
I am one who agrees that the Bible adequately spells out the ways and means toward salvation. The bosom of Abraham is not the home of the saved. Illustration for something else. The story of Noah, so often discussed here and everywhere, may readily be an illustration toward the saving power of God, and also the fact that he is judge and executioner. One goes with the other. Parables, illustrations, allegories, etal, serve their purpose, one would hope, so does the recounting of the life (good and bad) of those within its pages.
Toward that end, teaching and warning and telling of God's qualities, I believe the Bible to be 100% accurate and true.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by NosyNed, posted 12-31-2005 4:00 PM NosyNed has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by NosyNed, posted 01-01-2006 11:59 AM DorfMan has replied

DorfMan
Member (Idle past 6111 days)
Posts: 282
From: New York
Joined: 09-08-2005


Message 22 of 302 (274634)
01-01-2006 11:47 AM
Reply to: Message 12 by Nuggin
12-31-2005 4:19 PM


Re: Giants?
quote:
Twenty descriptions of the people involved in the accident, all different.
Tell me, does it negate the event?
Let me ask you this. If 20 different people swear that their account of the accident is the Word of God and therefore infalible, how do you figure out who is right?
You did not answer my question.
Please explain what you mean here.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Nuggin, posted 12-31-2005 4:19 PM Nuggin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by Nuggin, posted 01-01-2006 11:55 AM DorfMan has replied

DorfMan
Member (Idle past 6111 days)
Posts: 282
From: New York
Joined: 09-08-2005


Message 25 of 302 (274638)
01-01-2006 11:56 AM
Reply to: Message 19 by Nuggin
01-01-2006 11:40 AM


Re: minor differences
quote:
In fact, there is a clear pattern in tales about Giants that they grow in height.
There are giants still on the earth today. Not the lone one here and there, but whole tribes of them. It's a good thing.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Nuggin, posted 01-01-2006 11:40 AM Nuggin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by Nuggin, posted 01-01-2006 12:00 PM DorfMan has replied

DorfMan
Member (Idle past 6111 days)
Posts: 282
From: New York
Joined: 09-08-2005


Message 27 of 302 (274640)
01-01-2006 12:00 PM
Reply to: Message 24 by Nuggin
01-01-2006 11:55 AM


Re: Giants?
quote:
When twenty people witness an accident, each is saying, "This is what I saw."
But if you asked each of them point blank - "Do X happen?" The most common response will be "I only know what I saw."
If you tell them, your account of the accident is different from this other witnesses account - "I only know what I saw."
They don't say, "He is wrong, I am right. I know that I am right because I am infallible."
If you take that witness into a room and show them a video tape of the accident that differs from their account - "Well, that's not how it looked to me."
They don't say, "The videotape is wrong, I am right. I know that I am right because I am infallible."
What the YECs are asking is that we teach their "infallible" account of (the accident) in public schools and/or that we don't show the videotape.
Does that clear it up?
You're all over the place with something. I hope you find the map and get there, eventually.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 24 by Nuggin, posted 01-01-2006 11:55 AM Nuggin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by Nuggin, posted 01-01-2006 12:05 PM DorfMan has not replied

DorfMan
Member (Idle past 6111 days)
Posts: 282
From: New York
Joined: 09-08-2005


Message 30 of 302 (274643)
01-01-2006 12:06 PM
Reply to: Message 26 by NosyNed
01-01-2006 11:59 AM


Re: a Christian
quote:
And finally to bring this back to the topic at hand: you'd agree that the most likely conclusion is that Goliath was somewhere in the high 6 foot range and not at a height that is outside the most extreme range that humans are naturally capable of reaching.
The story of Goliath makes him unusual for his setting. He was a lone tall man chosen to put holy fear into some people. It worked. I know that I don't have to tell you that nature makes great wonders, some of them tall and even very tall.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 26 by NosyNed, posted 01-01-2006 11:59 AM NosyNed has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 34 by Nuggin, posted 01-01-2006 12:11 PM DorfMan has replied

DorfMan
Member (Idle past 6111 days)
Posts: 282
From: New York
Joined: 09-08-2005


Message 33 of 302 (274646)
01-01-2006 12:10 PM
Reply to: Message 28 by Nuggin
01-01-2006 12:00 PM


Re: minor differences
quote:
Average height 9ft tall? I don't think so.
Nature is a remarkable event and limitless in my opinion. I'll accept your need to place stops on what you find acceptable.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by Nuggin, posted 01-01-2006 12:00 PM Nuggin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 38 by Nuggin, posted 01-01-2006 12:25 PM DorfMan has replied

DorfMan
Member (Idle past 6111 days)
Posts: 282
From: New York
Joined: 09-08-2005


Message 35 of 302 (274649)
01-01-2006 12:12 PM
Reply to: Message 32 by NosyNed
01-01-2006 12:09 PM


Re: Eye witnesses
quote:
and if you have some of the witnesses describing the car that caused the accident as a 2004 Nash Rambler what would you conclude about those witnesses?
ahahahahahahaaaaaaaa
good and funny!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by NosyNed, posted 01-01-2006 12:09 PM NosyNed has not replied

DorfMan
Member (Idle past 6111 days)
Posts: 282
From: New York
Joined: 09-08-2005


Message 36 of 302 (274650)
01-01-2006 12:14 PM
Reply to: Message 34 by Nuggin
01-01-2006 12:11 PM


Re: a Christian
quote:
The story of Goliath makes him unusual for his setting. He was a lone tall man chosen to put holy fear into some people.
Actually, 1 Chronicles 20 mentions 3 giants - all of them decendents of a race of giants, the Gath.
So, there was a whole tribe of 9'9" guys roaming around.
And those aren't even the BIG giants of the Bible. In Numbers 13:33 witnesses talk about a race of giants which make normal men seem like grasshoppers in comparison.
Thank you. I am aware.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by Nuggin, posted 01-01-2006 12:11 PM Nuggin has not replied

DorfMan
Member (Idle past 6111 days)
Posts: 282
From: New York
Joined: 09-08-2005


Message 170 of 302 (275000)
01-02-2006 1:50 PM
Reply to: Message 38 by Nuggin
01-01-2006 12:25 PM


Re: minor differences
quote:
I agree that there are groups of people 7ft tall. I disagree that there are groups of people 9ft tall.
I don't believe I said there are groups of people nine feet tall - somewhere. Unlimited nature is simply the possibility that nine foot tall and taller people could most certainly have walked this planet.
I reiterate my statement
quote:
Nature is a remarkable event and limitless in my opinion. I'll accept your need to place stops on what you find acceptable.
which you may certainly take as you like.
Agree or disagree - one is as fine as the other.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 38 by Nuggin, posted 01-01-2006 12:25 PM Nuggin has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 172 by Nuggin, posted 01-02-2006 2:02 PM DorfMan has replied

DorfMan
Member (Idle past 6111 days)
Posts: 282
From: New York
Joined: 09-08-2005


Message 171 of 302 (275001)
01-02-2006 1:59 PM
Reply to: Message 53 by randman
01-01-2006 5:10 PM


Re: Giants?
quote:
There are many denomination which operate through instilling fear in the believer. It is to their advantage to do so. Financial, mostly.
I see the same thing with evos. There is great fear of evolution being overturned, imo, and there is a strong financial interest in evos maintaining and defending their belief system.
Of course, financials are important.
I see no threat to evolution being overturned. The argument is more about origin than evolution.
There are many Christians who understand evolution and have no beef with it. I call them blessed.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by randman, posted 01-01-2006 5:10 PM randman has not replied

DorfMan
Member (Idle past 6111 days)
Posts: 282
From: New York
Joined: 09-08-2005


Message 173 of 302 (275004)
01-02-2006 2:09 PM
Reply to: Message 63 by Nuggin
01-01-2006 5:55 PM


Re: Giants?
quote:
Dorf
There are many denomination which operate through instilling fear in the believer.
RAndman
There is great fear of evolution being overturned
Wow did you miss the point there.
He's not talking about religions which fear that their beliefs are going to be overturned. He's talking about religions which control their members through fear. If their beliefs were overturned, they would be free from fear.
Here's an example: "If you aren't born again, when the rapture comes the world is going to be a giant torture chamber and you'll suffer along with all the other unbelievers."
That's preaching fear.
Nug
More horrid things than that are preached.
Your statement about free from fear if beliefs were overturned - is naive at best. The resulting chaos would be devastating on a personal and collective level. One would hope for a gentler method, such as replacing error with truth, such as - there'll be no rapture.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by Nuggin, posted 01-01-2006 5:55 PM Nuggin has not replied

DorfMan
Member (Idle past 6111 days)
Posts: 282
From: New York
Joined: 09-08-2005


Message 178 of 302 (275012)
01-02-2006 2:24 PM
Reply to: Message 172 by Nuggin
01-02-2006 2:02 PM


Re: minor differences
quote:
I'll accept your need to place stops on what you find acceptable.
And I'll accept your need to believe in magic as a source of scientific revelation.
Pardon me?
Or - Huh?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 172 by Nuggin, posted 01-02-2006 2:02 PM Nuggin has not replied

DorfMan
Member (Idle past 6111 days)
Posts: 282
From: New York
Joined: 09-08-2005


Message 179 of 302 (275014)
01-02-2006 2:27 PM
Reply to: Message 176 by Yaro
01-02-2006 2:20 PM


Re: Now where did I leave that Holy Book?
quote:
.. So how do you go about proving inerrancy?
Has the plan of salvation remained the same?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 176 by Yaro, posted 01-02-2006 2:20 PM Yaro has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 180 by Yaro, posted 01-02-2006 2:31 PM DorfMan has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024