Rebuttal To Creationists - "Since We Can't Directly Observe Evolution..."

Chirality. Yep, that's what it is. Just what I said. Did you read and understand the words or were you looking at the pretty pictures?You just posted the wiki to show how right I was.Thanx.BTW, you have a religion addiction.

What I said was: "While you're waiting, you could answer some of your unanswered posts. I count about ten different topics that you've missed answering."This topic is not about abiogenesis. Start an appropriate topic. If you're even worse than some goober who thinks abiogenesis is "impossible". I can see why you're avoiding the subject.

You know nothing about chemistry. Abiogenesis is practically inevitable. It has nothing to do with atheism. It's about chemistry.And there's no "panic" about it. I will gladly give you a kindergarten-level lesson in chemistry - in an appropriate topic. Try to be wrong (and stupid) about one thing at a time.

Like creationists, who choose to believe a pack of lies.

I think I have said before, I will bet you that we do exactly that before your "savior" comes back. How much do you want to bet? Nobody cares what you dismiss. If you want to learn about all the action that IS going on in the field of abiogenesis, google it.

I'll be glad to discuss chemistry with you, ESPECIALLY organic chemistry. But that's a different topic. Start one. I dare ya. Some compounds are more difficult to synthesize than others but in fact, organic synthesis is difficult to prevent. The problem is with side-products that need to be selected out. Been there, done that. YOU are the one who is trying to divert the topic to abiogenesis. Start a new topic for that and we can run both at once.

I have offered to bet you that we will produce life in the lab before your "savior" returns.

AZPaul3:

---

Chirality. Yep, that's what it is. Just what I said. Did you read and understand the words or were you looking at the pretty pictures?
​
You just posted the wiki to show how right I was.
​
Thanx.

---

Does AZPaul3 need a quote?
Chirality - Wikipedia

quote:

---

All of the known life-forms show specific chiral properties in chemical structures as well as macroscopic anatomy, development and behavior.[26] In any specific organism or evolutionarily related set thereof, individual compounds, organs, or behavior are found in the same single enantiomorphic form. Deviation (having the opposite form) could be found in a small number of chemical compounds, or certain organ or behavior but that variation strictly depends upon the genetic make up of the organism. From chemical level (molecular scale), biological systems show extreme stereospecificity in synthesis, uptake, sensing, metabolic processing. A living system usually deals with two enantiomers of the same compound in drastically different ways.

---

AZPaul3:

---

BTW, you have a religion addiction.

---

So, how much time do biologists need in the lab in order for you to win your bet with Dredge?

Kleinman:

---

Jame Tour does a much better job describing why abiogenesis is not possible.

ringo:

---

What I said was: "While you're waiting, you could answer some of your unanswered posts. I count about ten different topics that you've missed answering."
​
This topic is not about abiogenesis. Start an appropriate topic.

---

---

What have you said that was interesting in any of your previous posts? And why should I start a topic on abiogenesis where you don't have any experiments that demonstrate this? You won't discuss descent with modification when we do have experiments that demonstrate that phenomenon.

You've said twice that you were impressed by my attention to detail - so it's a little late now to start pretending that you're not interested in what I say. How would you know what I have in support of abiogenesis? If you're not afraid to find out, start a topic. But I HAVE been discussing that. Sixty-four posts in this very thread, and counting. And you've QUOTED some of them. Try to maintain at least a thin fiber of connection to reality.And YOU are the one who is trying to divert the discussion to off-topic abiogenesis.

Kleinman:

---

What have you said that was interesting in any of your previous posts?

ringo:

---

You've said twice that you were impressed by my attention to detail - so it's a little late now to start pretending that you're not interested in what I say.

---

---

Just because you are a nitpicker doesn't make you interesting. That's not the kind of thing that makes me a fan of yours. Try posting something interesting.

Kleinman:

---

And why should I start a topic on abiogenesis where you don't have any experiments that demonstrate this?

ringo:

---

How would you know what I have in support of abiogenesis? If you're not afraid to find out, start a topic.

---

---

Tell it to the biologists so that AZPaul3 can have a chance to win his bet with Dredge. I wouldn't count on this AZPaul3. And AZPaul3, I suggest you lay off the vino. It's affecting your ability to perceive reality.

Kleinman:

---

You won't discuss descent with modification when we do have experiments that demonstrate that phenomenon.

ringo:

---

But I HAVE been discussing that. Sixty-four posts in this very thread, and counting. And you've QUOTED some of them. Try to maintain at least a thin fiber of connection to reality.
​
And YOU are the one who is trying to divert the discussion to off-topic abiogenesis.

---

---

Sixty-four posts filling space, are you trying to set a record? And have you noticed that Tany doesn't explain his claim about endogenous retroviruses? Why don't you start a topic on abiogenesis? If you can come up with something interesting, perhaps I'll comment. I like surprises.

Oh boy, this is my lucky day! ... like stealing candy from a baby. The former is impossible and the latter is a certainty.

Action? What action? A bunch of idiotic dreamers concocting worthless hypotheses about how God performed the miracle of life isn't my idea of "action".Wake me up when someone actually performs said miracle.

While you're at it, give me a kindergarten-level in spelling. "panick"?

Wow, you're a glutton for punishment, I must say. Not only are you inviting me to make a fool of you again, this time I'm going to empty your wallet as well!By the way, since you don't have any friends, I will supply the "two guests". No worries, mate.And I hope you like red wine coz you won't be buying us any of that sissy white stuff.