|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Rebuttal To Creationists - "Since We Can't Directly Observe Evolution..." | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kleinman Member (Idle past 366 days) Posts: 2142 From: United States Joined: |
Theodoric:You are an idiot that has no idea how biological evolution works. You can't even explain the Kishony or Lenski experiments, the simplest examples of biological evolution. You are just full of hot air.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8564 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 5.1
|
Now, AZPaul3 is going to explain the Kishony and Lenski experiments. No he won't. No one is interested in your fumbled math and failed explanations. You have shown you know nothing. Good to see PaulK and Taq having to continually correct you about near everything you post. You are entertainment. However, I'm waiting for you to give up trying to explain math you don't know and genetics, of which you know even less, and go full blown crazy catholic creationist on us. Stop belittling us obviously lesser intellects, put it all together, take the eucharist, and finally disprove evolution.Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kleinman Member (Idle past 366 days) Posts: 2142 From: United States Joined: |
Kleinman:I don't have to belittle numbskulls like you. You prove how little you know about biological evolution every time you post. That's why you can't explain the Kishony and Lenski experiments. And neither can Taq or PaulK.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.6
|
quote: They had no problem because you explicitly explained what you were doing.
quote: Wrong. And I even rewrote the example with assumed homozygosity, just for you. It shingled nothing of significance because it is just a simple application of the rule of 1.
quote: I didn’t claim heterozygosity, nor did I claim that YOU claimed heterozygosity. Those blunders are yours.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.6 |
I guess you still don’t know what retroviruses do to a cell.
Too bad.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9207 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.4 |
Weird how you are attacking me for something you and I are not even discussing.
What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. -Christopher Hitchens Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts "God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness. If your viewpoint has merits and facts to back it up why would you have to lie?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
AZPaul3 Member Posts: 8564 From: Phoenix Joined: Member Rating: 5.1 |
I don't have to belittle numbskulls like you. Then get on with the rest. Put it all together, take the eucharist, and finally disprove evolution. That is your ultimate goal, yes? Or is there no purpose to this other than your ignored and hurting ego?Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kleinman Member (Idle past 366 days) Posts: 2142 From: United States Joined: |
Kleinman:I listed the link to the paper many times. You just never bothered to read it. Kleinman:Sure it is a simple example of the rule of one because there the subsets are mutually exclusive. Is it that hard for you to understand? Kleinman:Sure you did, you didn't understand that C simply represented all the non-A and non-B alleles. That's why you introduced a, b, c, and d alleles. You made a blunder. My simplified model is correct. The probability of an adaptive recombination event depends on the frequencies of alleles in the population.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kleinman Member (Idle past 366 days) Posts: 2142 From: United States Joined: |
PaulK:They certainly don't make UCD possible and the idea that there are 100s of thousands of these in the human genome is nonsense. That's as smart as the idea of junk DNA. That was a really smart idea of biologists.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kleinman Member (Idle past 366 days) Posts: 2142 From: United States Joined: |
Theodoric:You are just an idiot that doesn't understand the physics and mathematics of biological evolution. You can't even explain the Kishony and Lenski experiments, the simplest examples of biological evolution.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kleinman Member (Idle past 366 days) Posts: 2142 From: United States Joined: |
Kleinman:You have just proved my point. You can't explain the simplest examples of biological evolution. You are a numbskull.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Theodoric Member Posts: 9207 From: Northwest, WI, USA Joined: Member Rating: 3.4 |
Weird how you are attacking me for something you and I are not even discussing.
What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence. -Christopher Hitchens Facts don't lie or have an agenda. Facts are just facts "God did it" is not an argument. It is an excuse for intellectual laziness. If your viewpoint has merits and facts to back it up why would you have to lie?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Kleinman Member (Idle past 366 days) Posts: 2142 From: United States Joined: |
Theodoric:I'm discussing the physics and mathematics of biological evolution. Who knows what a dummy like you is discussing?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tanypteryx Member Posts: 4452 From: Oregon, USA Joined: Member Rating: 5.5 |
Kleinman the Bullshitter writes: AZPaul3 writes:
You are too stupid to realize you are not random sampling. At least he's chasing something real not the bs fantasy you are fumbling all over.
Tanypteryx writes: And he still has no chance of explaining the patterns of ERVs, because he can't even figure out how to search for patterns in large data sets. He even thinks fossils are the work of Gypsies. Oh nice deflection! Next Kleinman the Bullshitter will show us how the Gypsies create fossils in the middle of rocks.
Message 1539Kleinman the Bullshitter writes: They certainly don't make UCD possible and the idea that there are 100s of thousands of these in the human genome is nonsense. That's as smart as the idea of junk DNA. That was a really smart idea of biologists. So that's your evidence, personal incredulity? I note that you have presented no evidence to refute the pattern of ERVs found in many genomes of sexually reproducing species. Not one single paper, nothing... At least there are papers showing that some of what was called "junk DNA" decades ago has functions, but nothing showing that ERVs have been mistakenly identified. And no one, not one single person has said or implied that ERVs make UCD possible. The pattern of ERVs is the evidence that inheritance happens and that all life is related, not the cause, but obviously one of the consequences of UCD. And YOU have presented NO counter evidence and you will NEVER be able to explain the pattern of ERVs that are observed and obvious in the genomes of living organisms. Kleinman the Bullshitter writes: That's as smart as the idea of junk DNA. That was a really smart idea of biologists. One of the standards of science that has always fascinated me is that "when presented with evidence that contradicts current views, science has no choice but to modify the theory to include the new observations."Stop Tzar Vladimir the Condemned! What if Eleanor Roosevelt had wings? -- Monty Python One important characteristic of a theory is that is has survived repeated attempts to falsify it. Contrary to your understanding, all available evidence confirms it. --Subbie If evolution is shown to be false, it will be at the hands of things that are true, not made up. --percy The reason that we have the scientific method is because common sense isn't reliable. -- Taq
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PaulK Member Posts: 17828 Joined: Member Rating: 2.6 |
quote: That’s not much of an excuse. If you choose to use unclear notation it shouldn’t require following a link to see what it means.
quote: You were the one objecting to it on spurious grounds. That’s not my fault.
quote: Which does not in any way make my point incorrect. You choose to confuse the issue with your arrogant bluster, and that is entirely your fault.
quote: A minor error, due to your use of unclear notation. The point made was still correct. You’ve made far worse blunders. Your mistaken claim that I was assuming heterozygosity was at least as bad.
quote: And those frequencies will not be static. Indeed, if the alleles are adaptive they will tend to increase.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024