|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0 |
Summations Only | Thread ▼ Details |
Member (Idle past 5938 days) Posts: 3435 From: Edmonton Alberta Canada Joined: |
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The Meaning Of The Trinity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
candle2 Member Posts: 850 Joined: Member Rating: 1.2 |
Dredge, there was a Simon in Rome, but it wasn't Simon
Peter; it was Simon Magus, the magician. Numerous ecclesiastical writers of the 2nd Century giveinfo negating Peter as Bishop of Rome. The majority of scholars admit this. The exception are Conservatives Catholics. Peter being in Rome was not promulgated until the 4thCentury. Paul was never under Peter. In fact, Paul confrontedPeter to his face in Gal. 2:11-14. Paul confronted Peter for pulling away from the Gentileswhen certain others Jews would show up. Once again, Paul was the Apostle to the Gentiles-theuncircumcised. Peter was the Apostles to the Jews- the circumcised. Ephesians 2:7-8. The Church was built upon Christ. He was the chiefcornerstone and it's very foundation. It is not the church of Peter. It is the church of God. Peter never died for anyone. His blood was no differentthan that of any other man. Matthew 23:9 "And call no man your father upon theearth: for one is your Father, which is in heaven." Jesus was not telling His followers not to call theirbiological dad father. He was telling them not to call a religious leader "father."
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
candle2 Member Posts: 850 Joined: Member Rating: 1.2 |
Dredge, some, especially the RCC, use certain Bible
verses to show that they have power to forgive sin. For example, John 20:23 "Whose soever sins ye remit,They are remitted unto them; and whose soever sin ye retain, they are retained." This can be a difficult verse to understand. But we mustkeep some in mind. Isaiah 43:25 "I, even I, am He that blots out thytransgressions for my own sake, and will not remember thy sins." Mark 2:7 "...who can forgive sin but God only." 1John 1:9 "If we confess our sins, he is faithful andjust to forgive us our sins, and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness." Several Bible translations have it worded a bitdifferently. For example: "Whatever you forbid on earth must bewhat is already forbidden in heaven." "Whatever you bind on earth shall have been bound inheaven." "Whatever you loose on earth shall have been loosed inheaven." The Apostles were full of the Holy Spirit. The spirit ledlife is led by judgement from God. We know that the Apostles led Spirit filled lives. However,they did not have authority to change God's laws. One example of what this verse means is found in 1 Cor.51-6. Paul told the church at Corinth that a man who was indulging in immoral sexuality with his mother-in- law should be removed from the church. He was causing dissention in the church. In 2Cor. 2:6-7 Paul advised the church at Corinth that theyought to forgive him. The man's punishment had brought him much sorrow. The man had received forgiveness from God after repenting. Paul, led by the Spirit, was instructed by God that theman had bee forgiven. Paul did not have the authority to forgive the man. ButGod let Paul know that the man had been forgiven. The Apostles were responsible for the churches theystarted.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
candle2 Member Posts: 850 Joined: Member Rating: 1.2 |
Dredge, Paul states in 2 Timothy 1:11 "Whereunto I am
appointed a preacher, and an Apostle, and a teacher to The Gentiles." Once again the Bible states the Paul was sent to theGentiles. Romans 15:16 "That I should be the minister of JesusChrist to the Gentiles, ministering the gospel of God, that the offering up of the Gentiles might be acceptable, being sanctified by the Holy Spirit." In 56-56 AD, the church at Rome had not beenestablished. Paul's states this very clearly in Romans 1:11. Paul tells them that he would like to impart unto them some spiritual gift that they may be established. The RCC would have us believe that it was started 10 or11 years earlier under the reign of Claudius. Paul states in Romans 15:20 that he would not buildupon another man's foundation. He would not preach where Christ had already been named. If Peter had indeed started the church at Rome tenyears earlier, this would have been an insult to Peter. In fact, it would have been a major insult. In the 16th Chapter of Romans, Paul greeted 28 people,but Peter is never mentioned. This would have been at least a decade since the RCC claims that Peter was the first pope.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
candle2 Member Posts: 850 Joined: Member Rating: 1.2 |
Dredge, around 45-46 AD, the Apostle Peter was thrown
into prison in Jerusalem. You can read about this in Acts 12:3-4. It was in Antioch, around 51 AD, that Paul confrontedPeter to his face. Paul confronted Peter for refusing to sit and eat with the Gentiles. Imagine that! The so-called Bishop of Rome would noteat with the Gentiles. 1 Peter 5:13 states that (around 65-66 AD) Peter was inBabylon among the Jews. At that time there were as many Jews in Mesopotamia as there were in Palestine. Remember, Peter was an Apostle for the circumcised. The Bible clearly shows that Peter was not in Rome. Who are you going to believe?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
candle2 Member Posts: 850 Joined: Member Rating: 1.2 |
Dredge, "given the keys of the kingdom" does not mean
what the RCC says it mean. In Isaiah 22:22 we read where Eliakim (priest) was givenThe key to the house of David. Speaking of Eliakim, David stated "so he shall open, andnone shall shut; and He shall shut, and none shall open. Eliakim would not let anyone into David's house that he(King David) did not want in his house. Neither could Peter, nor any of the Apostles, allow anyoneaccess to the Kingdom of God without His approval. God is not obligated to bind that which, or those who, areungodly. The Apostles were led by the Spirit of God. They had thekey (knowledge) of how to get into the kingdom. Their job was to spread this knowledge. Peter was not the only Apostle with the key. In Matthew18:19, Jesus used the "second plural form of you, which Is "ye" to show that all the Apostles had the key to the Kingdom. Spirit led pastors today are allowed to tell a repentantsinner that their sins have been forgiven by God. Paul states in 2 Thess. 3:14 that the Church is notobligated to keep company with an unrepentant sinner. He states that "he (the sinner) may be ashamed. What Jesus said in a nut shell is that the Apostles andSpirit led pastors of His church have the authority to represent Him. In Matthew 16:19; 18:18; and, John 20:23 the actions arecalled "future perfect passives." God had already determined what is good and acceptable. The Apostles were not given authority to change God's laws. They were merely given authority to represent Him andHis laws. Never were they given authority to change His laws. Matthew makes in clear in 7:24-25 that Christ is the RockThe the Church is built on, not Peter. So does Ephesians 2:20 and 1 Corinthians 10:4.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
candle2 Member Posts: 850 Joined: Member Rating: 1.2 |
Dredge, you are bound and determined that Peter is the
head of God's Church. You are hung up on one ambigious verse. You throw away major portions of the Bible in order tostick with what you have been led to believe. Acts 12:3-4 clearly states that in around 45 AD Peter wasin prison. In 49 AD Peter was at the Jerusalem Council. Acts 15. In Antioch in 51 AD, Peter was in Antioch, where Paulconfronted him to his face. Why did Paul confront Peter? Paul confronted him for not sitting and eating with the Gentiles when other Jews were around. This in no way sounds like someone who would moveamong the Gentiles and start a church. Peter writes that in 66 AD that he was in Babylon. Therewere as many Jews in Mesopotamia at that time than there were in Palestine. Many scholars insist that Peter's writings have a definiteAramaic tinge. The type of Aramaic spoken in Babylon. Once again Peter was an Apostle to the Jews. Paul wasthe Apostle to the Gentiles. The Bible clearly proves that Peter was not in Rome. It is not good when someone puts their faith in men whocan change Biblical laws with the drop of hat. They then have the wherewithal to make a followerbelieve almost anything. Christ states that He is the head of the church; no one else. Christ also states the church is His bride and He thebridegroom. He never says a mortal man is the bridegroom.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
candle2 Member Posts: 850 Joined: Member Rating: 1.2 |
Dredge, notice John's prophecy in Rev. 17:3 where he
saw a woman sit upon a scarlet colored beast, full of names of blasphemy. A woman is used as a symbol of a church. In this casean apostate church. This apostate church is the same as the second beast inRev. 13. The beast that she rides is the first beast in Rev. 13. This great false church is ruled by Satan. His counterfeitreligion had already began setting down roots during the days of the Apostles. Paul and John specifically warned Christ's followers not to be deceived by her lawlessness. This church practiced some aspects of Christianity, justenough to call itself Christian This false church has possessed much power during thecourse of her existence, even political power. This church from its beginning has had concourse withemperors, presidents, kings, and rulers from around the world. It has strong influence on the majority of nations and cultures, including politics. In Rev. 17:5 John states "And upon her forehead was aname written MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH." This mother church has daughter churches that came outof her in protest.However, they still practice and defend a good number of her abominations. This church practices a mystery religion, with many ofher doctrines dating to ancient Babylon at the time of Nimrod and Semiramis, the founders of the Babylonish mystery religion. This great false church is pictured as being drunk withthe blood of the saints. Both this harlot and the beast that she rides havepersecuted and killed many ot those who remained faithful to God's laws. This universal church has adopted practices from paganreligions and label them as Christian.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
candle2 Member Posts: 850 Joined: Member Rating: 1.2 |
Dredge, notice John's prophecy in Rev. 17:3 where he
saw a woman sit upon a scarlet colored beast, full of names of blasphemy. A woman is used as a symbol of a church. In this casean apostate church. This apostate church is the same as the second beast inRev. 13. The beast that she rides is the first beast in Rev. 13. This great false church is ruled by Satan. His counterfeitreligion had already began setting down roots during the days of the Apostles. Paul and John specifically warned Christ's followers not to be deceived by her lawlessness. This church practiced some aspects of Christianity, justenough to call itself Christian This false church has possessed much power during thecourse of her existence, even political power. This church from its beginning has had concourse withemperors, presidents, kings, and rulers from around the world. It has strong influence on the majority of nations and cultures, including politics. In Rev. 17:5 John states "And upon her forehead was aname written MYSTERY, BABYLON THE GREAT, THE MOTHER OF HARLOTS AND ABOMINATIONS OF THE EARTH." This mother church has daughter churches that came outof her in protest.However, they still practice and defend a good number of her abominations. This church practices a mystery religion, with many ofher doctrines dating to ancient Babylon at the time of Nimrod and Semiramis, the founders of the Babylonish mystery religion. This great false church is pictured as being drunk withthe blood of the saints. Both this harlot and the beast that she rides havepersecuted and killed many ot those who remained faithful to God's laws. This universal church has adopted practices from paganreligions and label them as Christian.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
candle2 Member Posts: 850 Joined: Member Rating: 1.2
|
Dredge, when Jesus said "and upon this rock I will build
my church," what in the world makes you think that He was talking about Peter? When speaking about Peter "rock" is from Petros.Petros is simply "a piece of the rock." Rock, when referring to Jesus, is from Petra. Petrarefers to "a mass of Rock" or "boulder." The Word that Jesus used for the "Rock" that He wouldbuild His house upon is "Petra." You can look this up yourself. And, I wonder why youhave not already done so. Jesus could have simply touched His finger to His chestwhen He said "upon this Rock I will build my church." However, there was no need for Him to have done so.He used the word "Petra." Peter was anything but a rock. Peter was brash,impulsive, and strong-willed. Peter swore that he would stand by Jesus and neverdeny Him. Yet, he did deny Him. And he cursed and swore at thosewho said he was one of Jesus' disciple. Peter showed fear and cowardice. The denial of Jesuswas shameful. Peter was impulsive when he asked Jesus to allow himto walk on water. He never thought it through, and when fear struck he began to sink. When Jesus described His upcoming death, Peter saidthat it would never happen. Jesus answered by saying "get behind me Satan, youare an offense to me. Peter relied on human reasoning and not the will of God. In other words, Peter spoke in opposition to God's plan. In the end Peter became a rock-solid member of thebody of Christ. And Acts shows that he became a mighty preacher. He became a great teacher of humility, hope, and love. However, he was a part of the body of Christ, just likethe other Apostles. The other Apostles were also rock- solid followers of Christ. Peter and the other Apostles were all pieces of the rockthat helped to make up the foundation of the church. But, Jesus was the Chief-cornerstone. He was the Rockthat the foundation rested upon.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
candle2 Member Posts: 850 Joined: Member Rating: 1.2 |
Dredge, when Jesus said "upon this Rock I will build my
church" HE was referring to himself. Jesus said upon Petra (which the NT uses when speakingof Jesus, and Jesus only) I will build my church. What Jesus did not say in this verse: He did not say upon Petros (which refers to Peter) I willbuild my church. He did not say upon Peter I will build my church. He did not say upon you I will build my church. He did not say that upon Petra He would build Peter'schurch. He did not say that upon Petros He would build Peter'sChurch. Peter became the chief Apostle. But, the church was notbuilt on him. The church was built upon Petra, not Petros.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
candle2 Member Posts: 850 Joined: Member Rating: 1.2 |
Dredge, Peter was petros-a piece of the rock. Jesus
only is Petra. Jesus clearly stated that Petra was who He would build His house on. Matthew 16 is clearly about Jesus being the Christ, theSon of the living God. It's focus is on featuring the truths about Jesus. The RCC wants to make Peter the focal point ofMatthew 16. The RCC has theoretically tried to make Peter the rock.The rest of the NT declares that Christ is the rock. The RCC's view is not the patristic view of the first fewcenturies. Historically, the assertion that the Church was built on Peter began several centuries after Peter's death. Even if Peter were the rock that the Church was built on,which He clearly isn't, how would that necessitate papal succession? Jesus is the Rock of ages; the Rock of salvation; theRock od deliverance. Peter was merely a small rock built atop the bedrock ofsomeone much bigger than himself.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
candle2 Member Posts: 850 Joined: Member Rating: 1.2 |
Tangle, every thing that you wrote is true, or moving in
that direction. But, the Holy Bible recorded the same propheciescenturies ago. You are merely asserting, an truthfully I might add, what the Bible says is a great falling away. I could cite dozens of examples where the Holy Biblestates this, but here are just a few. 2 Thessolonians 2:32 Timothy 3:entire chapter Matthew 24: Satan's deception becomes so great that even God'select could be deceived if God did not keep them focused. Matthew 24:24.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
candle2 Member Posts: 850 Joined: Member Rating: 1.2 |
Dredge, I know where the true Church is. But, I am nor
trying to recruit anyone to it. God will recruit whom He will. I suggest that anyone seeking God to seek Him with alltheir heart. That they pray to Him and Him only. Be like the Bereans; they searched the scriptures daily tosee if what they were hearing was Biblically true.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
candle2 Member Posts: 850 Joined: Member Rating: 1.2 |
Tangle, you will never hear me say that I fear anything.
I love God. And, I agree with His purpose. I also agreewith the method He's employing to bring it to fruition. It is impossible to have God in one's life and still begoverned by fear. You're barking up the wrong tree.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
candle2 Member Posts: 850 Joined: Member Rating: 1.2 |
Dredge, who gave the RCC the authority to replace God's
7th Day Sabbath with Sunday? Who gave the RCC the authority to abolish the 2ndCommandment? The 2nd Commandment states: "Thou shall not make unto thee any graven image, orany likeness of any thing that is in the heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth:" "Thou shall not bow down thyself to them, nor servethem:..." The RCC is filled to the brim with statues and idol. TheRCC bows down to these idols. The RCC also worships relics (bones and bone fragments).How is this different than, say, voodoo?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024