I will get back to you with the Mishna tractate; I don't remember the reference off hand and I need to do some hunting.
quote:
...could you elaborate on what you mean by "authority" and "inspiration?" when i say "the bible is inspired by god" i mean something very different than when a fundamentalist says "the bible is inspired by god."
I'm still developing my own position on the whole concept of "inspiration", but I believe the most logical starting point is in 2 Tim 3.16: "all Scripture is
God-breathed and useful for teaching, for refuting error, for correction, and for instruction in matters of righteousness."
There are three fundamental problems with understanding the passage:
1) What is "all Scripture"?
2) What is the meaning of "God-breathed"?
3) What specifically are the parametres and application of "teaching", "refuting error", "correction" and "instruction in matters of righteousness"?
Unfortunately, Paul never defined for us what his understanding of "Scripture" was, except to say that his writings and the writings of the other Apostles were included under the rubric. Paul quotes extensively from Scripture, but he does not restrict himself to a static "version", he has a tendency to conflate, adapt, and paraphrase, and he also quites from an ancient Greek poet and the Targumim on at least one occasion.
The word translated "God-breathed" (
theopneumatos) is very rare and very unusual. It is only written in one other place in the entire corpus of classical Greek literature. and its meaning is somewhat obscure. A very literal understanding of it conveys the idea that the sacred writings eminate from the person and presence of God.
As I read Paul's directive, it seems to me that Scripture is presented as a functional template, and not so much as an arbitrary standard. My own personal feelings are that this whole idea of "inspiration" has more to do with the function of Scripture as opposed to the very words. There is a long history in the textualization of Israel's tradition (and in Church traditions, for that matter!) of adaptation and contextualization of the sacred stories and ideas to more accurately reflect the circumstances of the present community. Inspiration means that while the concepts may be adaptable, there is an unending assurance that they have originated from God. I prefer to think that as the Word of God evolves, God is glorified, and thousands of years od history has proved this...
Am I making sense, or merely babbling irrational platitudes?
I am perhaps not clear about what "inspiration" is, but I am certain that it has little or nothing to do with fundamentalist ideas of inerrency and infallibility.