Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 0/368 Day: 0/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Jar's belief statement- Part 2
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 164 of 250 (338314)
08-06-2006 10:34 PM
Reply to: Message 163 by jar
08-06-2006 9:19 PM


Re: What is sin?
Let's back up a bit. First I am not sure that Jesus was without sin. He was tempted, he did doubt, but he overcame any of those. His lesson is that we as just plain humans do not have to sin, we too can choose to do what is right instead of what is wrong.
The problem with your religion, Jar, is that it's too sentimental to be taken seriously. You have no explanation for the intense human suffering down through history.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 163 by jar, posted 08-06-2006 9:19 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 165 by jar, posted 08-06-2006 10:38 PM robinrohan has replied
 Message 169 by riVeRraT, posted 08-07-2006 8:32 AM robinrohan has not replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 166 of 250 (338317)
08-06-2006 10:41 PM
Reply to: Message 165 by jar
08-06-2006 10:38 PM


Re: What is sin?
Really? What makes you think that?
You don't believe in the Fall.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 165 by jar, posted 08-06-2006 10:38 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 167 by jar, posted 08-06-2006 10:46 PM robinrohan has replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 171 of 250 (338352)
08-07-2006 8:55 AM
Reply to: Message 167 by jar
08-06-2006 10:46 PM


Re: What is sin?
Now if that is sentimental perhaps you can explain how?
There's no explanation for human suffering in your system. You just conveniently ignore that problem.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 167 by jar, posted 08-06-2006 10:46 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 173 by jar, posted 08-07-2006 10:47 AM robinrohan has replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 174 of 250 (338360)
08-07-2006 10:57 AM
Reply to: Message 173 by jar
08-07-2006 10:47 AM


Re: What is sin?
Human suffering comes from two sources, natural processes which we understand better everyday
Calling it a "natural process" doesn't explain anything. God made the process, so God is responsible. Your system has no explanation for this apparent cruelty of God.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 173 by jar, posted 08-07-2006 10:47 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 175 by jar, posted 08-07-2006 11:08 AM robinrohan has replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 176 of 250 (338373)
08-07-2006 1:04 PM
Reply to: Message 175 by jar
08-07-2006 11:08 AM


Re: Is GOD cruel?
What process is it you see as cruel? Can you give me an example?
There are many examples: birth defects, diseases, etc.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 175 by jar, posted 08-07-2006 11:08 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 177 by jar, posted 08-07-2006 1:08 PM robinrohan has replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 178 of 250 (338375)
08-07-2006 1:13 PM
Reply to: Message 177 by jar
08-07-2006 1:08 PM


Re: Is GOD cruel?
Let's try to get specific instead of you moving goal posts constantly. Which of those would you like to discuss?
It doesn't matter which we discuss. Any natural process that causes human suffering would need to be explained by any religion worth its salt. It's a classic problem. You can't just ignore it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 177 by jar, posted 08-07-2006 1:08 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 179 by jar, posted 08-07-2006 1:17 PM robinrohan has replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 180 of 250 (338378)
08-07-2006 1:21 PM
Reply to: Message 179 by jar
08-07-2006 1:17 PM


Re: Is GOD cruel?
You keep saying that but when I try to get you to discuss it you just keep asserting the same tired refrain all over again.
It's up to you to explain it. It's your religion, not mine. How do you justify birth defects?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 179 by jar, posted 08-07-2006 1:17 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 181 by jar, posted 08-07-2006 1:30 PM robinrohan has replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 182 of 250 (338383)
08-07-2006 1:35 PM
Reply to: Message 181 by jar
08-07-2006 1:30 PM


Re: Is GOD cruel?
First, I do NOT justify birth defects. I believe they are often a tragedy. They are though part of the same evolutionary process that gave us brains and so while unfortunate, not at all cruel.
Your God appears to be very limited in ability. I would have thought God would have been able to figure out a way to develop life that was less mistake-prone. He appears to be incompetent.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 181 by jar, posted 08-07-2006 1:30 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 183 by jar, posted 08-07-2006 1:45 PM robinrohan has replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 184 of 250 (338430)
08-07-2006 7:56 PM
Reply to: Message 183 by jar
08-07-2006 1:45 PM


Re: Is GOD cruel?
Also, as I said, the system also provided a method to ameliorate the bad effects of birth defects and hopefully someday eliminate them as needed
Why should there be any birth defects in the first place?
I find that makes more sense, (and remember, this discussion began when you asserted that my belief was just sentimental, an assertion you seem to have abandoned entirely as usual), than some theology that blames all on some Fall.
These constant accusations of my changing the topic or something is nonsense. You betray the sentimentality of your beleif in this latest post. It takes 3 billion years for this God to make a start on fixing the situation of human suffering? And you call this "near-perfect"? That's sentimentality.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 183 by jar, posted 08-07-2006 1:45 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 185 by jar, posted 08-07-2006 8:20 PM robinrohan has replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 186 of 250 (338444)
08-07-2006 9:04 PM
Reply to: Message 185 by jar
08-07-2006 8:20 PM


Re: Is GOD cruel?
The system is self correcting. The system works. The system has been working jess fine for at least 3 billion years
No, there have been many disasters. Birth defects, diseases, etc. It has not been "jess fine."
You neglected to include the second half of the sentence.
I granted that. One can always say that humans screw up a lot and cause their own suffering, although modern science has been eating away at that a bit. Sometimes we can't help what we do. It's genetics.
I guess some theology where the blame lies not in the individual but some fantasy Fall is not sentimental?
I'm not sure that that is accurate theology. According to traditional theology, we are individually responsible. As Paul says, "We sinned in Adam." This makes no sense to me, being a nihilist, but let's get our theology right.
Some "it's not MY fault" theology is not sentimental?
I'm not sure what theology of the Christian variety would claim that.
Some theology where "I'm saved and you aren't, nah-nah-nah" is not sentimental?
I don't think I would call that SENTIMENTAL. The opposite really.
Others are due to the same process that allows life to evolve and continue. Sorry, that is reality
True, but that doesn't say much for your God, who would allow such events to occur.
It seems to me that any other position, blame GOD as an example, is the sentimental position. You seem to believe otherwise and that is fine, I have never tried to change anyones beliefs or position.
Well, I'm always trying to change people's beliefs. It's one of my hobbies.
This "New Age" Christianity, Jar, will not do. Instead of talking about the central issue--the fact of human suffering--you try to slur it over by proclaiming how beautiful and awesome everything is and how wonderful the "system" of evolution is. The atheists like this sort of talk because at least these NewAgers accept scientific data and are willing to allow evolution to be taught in the schools. They are willing to put up with the illogicality of what you are proclaiming, because it is NICE and POLITICALLY CORRECT.
God's in his heaven and all's right with the world. Let's not try to
"change people's beliefs." That would not be NICE.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 185 by jar, posted 08-07-2006 8:20 PM jar has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 187 by robinrohan, posted 08-08-2006 7:29 PM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 188 by iano, posted 08-08-2006 8:07 PM robinrohan has not replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 187 of 250 (338637)
08-08-2006 7:29 PM
Reply to: Message 186 by robinrohan
08-07-2006 9:04 PM


Re: Is GOD cruel?
The atheists like this sort of talk because at least these NewAgers accept scientific data and are willing to allow evolution to be taught in the schools.
Now, from my own point of view, I really don't give a damn if evolution is taught in the schools or not. It might be kind of fun if the Congress passed an amendment banning teaching of evolution in any school. Then we could get together for secret "evolution parties" and whisper scandalous evolutionary thoughts to each other while sipping our whiskey sours. We could be part of the "underground movement."
Sounds exciting.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 186 by robinrohan, posted 08-07-2006 9:04 PM robinrohan has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 189 by nator, posted 08-08-2006 9:03 PM robinrohan has replied
 Message 192 by Faith, posted 08-08-2006 9:51 PM robinrohan has not replied
 Message 194 by Omnivorous, posted 08-08-2006 11:54 PM robinrohan has replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 197 of 250 (338679)
08-09-2006 8:11 AM
Reply to: Message 189 by nator
08-08-2006 9:03 PM


Re: Is GOD cruel?
Coming from a so-called college instructor, that is disappointing.
I'm not a "so-called" college instructor. I am an actual college instructor. Moreover, I was rated one of the best teachers on campus by the students. I got this plaque to prove it.
Edited by robinrohan, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 189 by nator, posted 08-08-2006 9:03 PM nator has not replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 204 of 250 (338725)
08-09-2006 2:14 PM
Reply to: Message 199 by riVeRraT
08-09-2006 8:47 AM


The case of the missing stump
Still there are moments when you lie on the bed at night wondering about things that are not explained by our "incredible" scientific abilities.
I can tell you something that happened to me that is totally unexplainable. About a dozen years ago or so, we had this tree out front that died. I cut it down but left the stump. I was planning on getting rid of it later.
One day I came home and the stump was gone. This was a pretty big stump. If you've ever tried to dig up a tree stump, you'll know that it's a big job. It just so happened that we had some roofers out that day putting on a new roof, so I thought maybe they did it(which makes no sense, of course). They didn't know anything about it. I went around to the neighbors. None of them knew anything about it. I called relatives, who knew nothing. I called the home-owner's association. I thought maybe they thought it was an eyesore and decided to get rid of it themselves. They told me they didn't operate that way (I knew they didn't, but I couldn't think of anything else).
To this day, we do not know what happened to the stump.
ABE: Would this qualify as a religious experience?
Edited by robinrohan, : No reason given.
Edited by robinrohan, : No reason given.
Edited by robinrohan, : changed subtitle

This message is a reply to:
 Message 199 by riVeRraT, posted 08-09-2006 8:47 AM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 205 by ringo, posted 08-09-2006 2:42 PM robinrohan has replied
 Message 210 by Parasomnium, posted 08-09-2006 5:52 PM robinrohan has replied
 Message 219 by riVeRraT, posted 08-09-2006 10:42 PM robinrohan has not replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 206 of 250 (338740)
08-09-2006 3:26 PM
Reply to: Message 205 by ringo
08-09-2006 2:42 PM


Re: The case of the missing stump
I also wouldn't call it "unexplainable" - I'd call it "unexplained".
Well, yes. I said "unexplainable" because I can't imagine any plausible explanation, unless there's some good Samaritan who goes around secretly removing stumps for people--the Batman of lawncare.
Was there just a hole where the stump used to be? Or was there no sign that there ever was a tree there? Any roots left? Any "trace" evidence at all? Trail of dirt across the lawn? Insects? Eggs? Did you have the soil tested? Any damage on other nearby trees? Did you consult a tree surgeon? Any tracks - human or vehicle? Did the neighbours notice any strange vehicles? Did you ask the local busybody? Did you look in all the local garbage bins?
Good questions. Whoever did this did it very neatly. You could tell where the stump had been but the hole had been filled some with dirt. The lawn around it was undisturbed. When we talked to the neighbors, we asked them not only if they did it, but if they saw anyone over there doing something. All answers were negative.
I can't imagine anyone doing this without letting us know.
Maybe an alien took it out to space to study.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 205 by ringo, posted 08-09-2006 2:42 PM ringo has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 207 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-09-2006 4:07 PM robinrohan has replied

  
robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 208 of 250 (338755)
08-09-2006 5:30 PM
Reply to: Message 207 by New Cat's Eye
08-09-2006 4:07 PM


Re: The case of the missing stump
There's always Goddidit but what about hyperdecomposition?
Never heard of it.
This is the only experience I have ever had that could be called "uncanny."
Some people seem to have a lot of them.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 207 by New Cat's Eye, posted 08-09-2006 4:07 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024