|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Jar's belief statement- Part 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Let's back up a bit. First I am not sure that Jesus was without sin. He was tempted, he did doubt, but he overcame any of those. His lesson is that we as just plain humans do not have to sin, we too can choose to do what is right instead of what is wrong. The problem with your religion, Jar, is that it's too sentimental to be taken seriously. You have no explanation for the intense human suffering down through history.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Really? What makes you think that? You don't believe in the Fall.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Now if that is sentimental perhaps you can explain how? There's no explanation for human suffering in your system. You just conveniently ignore that problem.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Human suffering comes from two sources, natural processes which we understand better everyday Calling it a "natural process" doesn't explain anything. God made the process, so God is responsible. Your system has no explanation for this apparent cruelty of God.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
What process is it you see as cruel? Can you give me an example? There are many examples: birth defects, diseases, etc.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Let's try to get specific instead of you moving goal posts constantly. Which of those would you like to discuss? It doesn't matter which we discuss. Any natural process that causes human suffering would need to be explained by any religion worth its salt. It's a classic problem. You can't just ignore it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
You keep saying that but when I try to get you to discuss it you just keep asserting the same tired refrain all over again. It's up to you to explain it. It's your religion, not mine. How do you justify birth defects?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
First, I do NOT justify birth defects. I believe they are often a tragedy. They are though part of the same evolutionary process that gave us brains and so while unfortunate, not at all cruel. Your God appears to be very limited in ability. I would have thought God would have been able to figure out a way to develop life that was less mistake-prone. He appears to be incompetent.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Also, as I said, the system also provided a method to ameliorate the bad effects of birth defects and hopefully someday eliminate them as needed Why should there be any birth defects in the first place?
I find that makes more sense, (and remember, this discussion began when you asserted that my belief was just sentimental, an assertion you seem to have abandoned entirely as usual), than some theology that blames all on some Fall. These constant accusations of my changing the topic or something is nonsense. You betray the sentimentality of your beleif in this latest post. It takes 3 billion years for this God to make a start on fixing the situation of human suffering? And you call this "near-perfect"? That's sentimentality.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
The system is self correcting. The system works. The system has been working jess fine for at least 3 billion years No, there have been many disasters. Birth defects, diseases, etc. It has not been "jess fine."
You neglected to include the second half of the sentence. I granted that. One can always say that humans screw up a lot and cause their own suffering, although modern science has been eating away at that a bit. Sometimes we can't help what we do. It's genetics.
I guess some theology where the blame lies not in the individual but some fantasy Fall is not sentimental? I'm not sure that that is accurate theology. According to traditional theology, we are individually responsible. As Paul says, "We sinned in Adam." This makes no sense to me, being a nihilist, but let's get our theology right.
Some "it's not MY fault" theology is not sentimental? I'm not sure what theology of the Christian variety would claim that.
Some theology where "I'm saved and you aren't, nah-nah-nah" is not sentimental? I don't think I would call that SENTIMENTAL. The opposite really.
Others are due to the same process that allows life to evolve and continue. Sorry, that is reality True, but that doesn't say much for your God, who would allow such events to occur.
It seems to me that any other position, blame GOD as an example, is the sentimental position. You seem to believe otherwise and that is fine, I have never tried to change anyones beliefs or position. Well, I'm always trying to change people's beliefs. It's one of my hobbies. This "New Age" Christianity, Jar, will not do. Instead of talking about the central issue--the fact of human suffering--you try to slur it over by proclaiming how beautiful and awesome everything is and how wonderful the "system" of evolution is. The atheists like this sort of talk because at least these NewAgers accept scientific data and are willing to allow evolution to be taught in the schools. They are willing to put up with the illogicality of what you are proclaiming, because it is NICE and POLITICALLY CORRECT. God's in his heaven and all's right with the world. Let's not try to"change people's beliefs." That would not be NICE.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
The atheists like this sort of talk because at least these NewAgers accept scientific data and are willing to allow evolution to be taught in the schools. Now, from my own point of view, I really don't give a damn if evolution is taught in the schools or not. It might be kind of fun if the Congress passed an amendment banning teaching of evolution in any school. Then we could get together for secret "evolution parties" and whisper scandalous evolutionary thoughts to each other while sipping our whiskey sours. We could be part of the "underground movement." Sounds exciting.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Coming from a so-called college instructor, that is disappointing. I'm not a "so-called" college instructor. I am an actual college instructor. Moreover, I was rated one of the best teachers on campus by the students. I got this plaque to prove it. Edited by robinrohan, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
Still there are moments when you lie on the bed at night wondering about things that are not explained by our "incredible" scientific abilities. I can tell you something that happened to me that is totally unexplainable. About a dozen years ago or so, we had this tree out front that died. I cut it down but left the stump. I was planning on getting rid of it later. One day I came home and the stump was gone. This was a pretty big stump. If you've ever tried to dig up a tree stump, you'll know that it's a big job. It just so happened that we had some roofers out that day putting on a new roof, so I thought maybe they did it(which makes no sense, of course). They didn't know anything about it. I went around to the neighbors. None of them knew anything about it. I called relatives, who knew nothing. I called the home-owner's association. I thought maybe they thought it was an eyesore and decided to get rid of it themselves. They told me they didn't operate that way (I knew they didn't, but I couldn't think of anything else). To this day, we do not know what happened to the stump. ABE: Would this qualify as a religious experience? Edited by robinrohan, : No reason given. Edited by robinrohan, : No reason given. Edited by robinrohan, : changed subtitle
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
I also wouldn't call it "unexplainable" - I'd call it "unexplained". Well, yes. I said "unexplainable" because I can't imagine any plausible explanation, unless there's some good Samaritan who goes around secretly removing stumps for people--the Batman of lawncare.
Was there just a hole where the stump used to be? Or was there no sign that there ever was a tree there? Any roots left? Any "trace" evidence at all? Trail of dirt across the lawn? Insects? Eggs? Did you have the soil tested? Any damage on other nearby trees? Did you consult a tree surgeon? Any tracks - human or vehicle? Did the neighbours notice any strange vehicles? Did you ask the local busybody? Did you look in all the local garbage bins? Good questions. Whoever did this did it very neatly. You could tell where the stump had been but the hole had been filled some with dirt. The lawn around it was undisturbed. When we talked to the neighbors, we asked them not only if they did it, but if they saw anyone over there doing something. All answers were negative. I can't imagine anyone doing this without letting us know. Maybe an alien took it out to space to study.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
robinrohan Inactive Member |
There's always Goddidit but what about hyperdecomposition? Never heard of it. This is the only experience I have ever had that could be called "uncanny." Some people seem to have a lot of them.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024