Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 0/368 Day: 0/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Jar's belief statement- Part 2
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 95 of 250 (336013)
07-28-2006 9:40 AM
Reply to: Message 94 by jar
07-28-2006 9:25 AM


Hi jar,
What's your opinion....do you think more people will go to heaven than not?
Just wondering...

This message is a reply to:
 Message 94 by jar, posted 07-28-2006 9:25 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 97 by jar, posted 07-28-2006 10:03 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 100 of 250 (336023)
07-28-2006 10:47 AM
Reply to: Message 97 by jar
07-28-2006 10:03 AM


Re: Just a WAG
I really don't know so as I say in the sub-title, this is just a WAG.
I realized that, I was just wondering what your thoughts were.
Since there are more non-believers than believers, then I guess when we look at the population as a whole, I would say I imagine more folk will go to heaven than not.
I think more will go than not too but I don't think it is becuase there are more non-believers. I just don't think its that complicated, like you promote, its pretty simple. And I agree with you that it isn't easy, but I don't think His expectations are too high for the majority of us to succeed.
Thanks for sharing.
ABE:
What about that whole narrow is the path to heaven thing?
Edited by Catholic Scientist, : note ABE

This message is a reply to:
 Message 97 by jar, posted 07-28-2006 10:03 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 102 by jar, posted 07-28-2006 11:10 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 103 of 250 (336033)
07-28-2006 11:16 AM
Reply to: Message 102 by jar
07-28-2006 11:10 AM


narrow gate
I think that ties in with much of the message of the Bible and is meant to get our attention. The path IS wide. I believe there are probaly many paths as a matter of fact. But we will be judged individually, one by one. There is not some freeway with eight lanes all running at maximum speed with no obstructions. It is a tollway and we will each stop at the gate, and either be allowed to pass on or turned back.
That's a good take on it, I like it.
I always took it to mean that there won't be very many people getting into heaven, which I disagree with, so it was something I've wondered about.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by jar, posted 07-28-2006 11:10 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 104 by iano, posted 07-28-2006 11:29 AM New Cat's Eye has replied
 Message 105 by jar, posted 07-28-2006 11:30 AM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 106 of 250 (336043)
07-28-2006 11:56 AM
Reply to: Message 105 by jar
07-28-2006 11:30 AM


Re: narrow gate
I still need some other way to express how we will each be judged individually, stopped, questioned and judged, but without the payment connection.
Any ideas?
Customs

This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by jar, posted 07-28-2006 11:30 AM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 107 by jar, posted 07-28-2006 12:04 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 108 of 250 (336049)
07-28-2006 12:19 PM
Reply to: Message 107 by jar
07-28-2006 12:04 PM


Re: narrow gate
Why, in your words, do you think Customs would be appropriate?
Oh, I dunno.
I only thought of it because you were asking for something like a tollbooth where we'll be questioned and no payment is needed. I just thought it seemes like customs. I've never considered Judgement to be like customs before you brought that up. But now that i think about it, it is kinda like customs because they decide if they're gonna let you in the country or not. They just use different reasons for the filter. More like "Whats you reson for comming in and what will you be doing?" type of thing. WRT heaven, no one questions why people want to go in or what they'll do, its just whether or not you are allowed in from what you've done before you got to the door. I think customs might do something like that too though, like a background check, and not letting criminals into the country, yeah? But still, there's some differences between Judgement and customs, although I think they are closer thatn Judgement and a tollbooth.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by jar, posted 07-28-2006 12:04 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by jar, posted 07-28-2006 12:24 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 110 of 250 (336051)
07-28-2006 12:27 PM
Reply to: Message 104 by iano
07-28-2006 11:29 AM


Re: narrow gate
Did you mean this passage from Matthew 7?
Yeah, that's the one. Its a quote from Jesus, right?
Your original take seems to be accurate - why do you disagree with it?
Well, I said in Message 100:
quote:
I think more will go than not too but I don't think it is becuase there are more non-believers. I just don't think its that complicated, like you promote, its pretty simple. And I agree with you that it isn't easy, but I don't think His expectations are too high for the majority of us to succeed.
Plus, it kinda turns god into an asshole if he sends most of the people he created to hell.
Also, maybe I disagree because it is more comforting to believe that its easier for me to get into heaven.
I don't like to disagree with Jesus, though, which is why I've always wondered about that line. I always figured I wasn't understanding it correctly in the interpretation that it means that less people get into heaven than don't. I like the interpretation that jar provided that it could be describing how the judgement will be on a an individual level so the gate is narrow, exept, in the quote you provided it specifically says few will get in.
I'll have to read the whole chapter to really know how I feel about it. Thanks for supplying the info.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by iano, posted 07-28-2006 11:29 AM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 113 by iano, posted 07-28-2006 1:15 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 111 of 250 (336052)
07-28-2006 12:29 PM
Reply to: Message 109 by jar
07-28-2006 12:24 PM


Re: narrow gate
Very interesting and a good analogy. Keep working on it and if you find something better will you let me know?
Absolutely.
For example, will it more like Ellis Island or the Pre-1991 Canadian Border?
lol, I dunno. I think I'm gonna have to read the Bible and think about it....when I have time. (I'm at work right now o.O)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by jar, posted 07-28-2006 12:24 PM jar has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 120 of 250 (336900)
07-31-2006 11:23 AM
Reply to: Message 113 by iano
07-28-2006 1:15 PM


Re: narrow gate
Its the person who cannot pass customs that is the asshole. The customs are just enforcing the standard.
But if god makes the standard so high that most people can't pass it then he is being mean about it. I think he should remain just, but I don't think the standard is set that high. I think if we just be good then everthing will be alright. The assholes do choose to be bad so I get what your saying, but I'm not a determinist so I do have some trouble with why YOU think this way. WRT determinism, the asshole don't really have a choice to be bad so this makes god look like an even bigger asshole.
However, if your understanding of heaven was eternal bliss and hell, eternal torment, then I doubt that even 80% in and 20% out (of heaven) would provide comfort (like, reversing the directions the respective gates take a person). Would you undertake a car journey in which you only had an 80% chance of surviving? I doubt it. But you would be content to ride in a gospel of same odds when your eternal destination is at stake? This doesn't add up.
Thats a poop analogy. Car journeys ARE very dangerous. As far as the journey being 80% successful, that depends on whether or not I have an affect on this. Can I increase the chances by driving safetly or is it that there's an 20% chance of a tire popping (something have no control over). If I have no control over it then you're right that I wouldn't take the chance, but if I was in control then I would take it. Make sense?
This gospel exists of course. But you don't plump for that gospel on the basis of the comfort it provides. Why is that?
Which gospel? What are you talking typing about?
Jesus refers to himself as "the gate". He also refers to himself as "the way"...the only way through which a man comes to the father. This parallels closely the narrow gate and path does it not?
Sure.
The gate needs to be found. The problem is not dealing with customs (which supposes that arrival at the gate is automatic) it is finding customs in the first place. The implication is that the exhortation to enter throught the narrow gate is a function of finding it here.
That's an interesting and respectable perspective but I disagree.
I was shown the gate very early in life and had no trouble finding it. The difficulty is in passing the customs, when I choose to go against god. I've found that I am a good person and when I add this to my faith in Jesus I realize that I am going to go to heaven. No problem.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 113 by iano, posted 07-28-2006 1:15 PM iano has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 144 by iano, posted 08-01-2006 11:25 AM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 121 of 250 (336901)
07-31-2006 11:25 AM
Reply to: Message 117 by riVeRraT
07-31-2006 8:40 AM


Re: Towards ending confusion?
I think we are, but don't know the difference.
You can have sin and not be damned. Being born into sin isn't as bad as being born damned, IMO.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by riVeRraT, posted 07-31-2006 8:40 AM riVeRraT has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 207 of 250 (338745)
08-09-2006 4:07 PM
Reply to: Message 206 by robinrohan
08-09-2006 3:26 PM


Re: The case of the missing stump
I can't imagine any plausible explanation
There's always Goddidit but what about hyperdecomposition?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 206 by robinrohan, posted 08-09-2006 3:26 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 208 by robinrohan, posted 08-09-2006 5:30 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024