|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 0/368 Day: 0/11 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: Jar's belief statement- Part 2 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
Hi jar,
What's your opinion....do you think more people will go to heaven than not? Just wondering...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
I really don't know so as I say in the sub-title, this is just a WAG. I realized that, I was just wondering what your thoughts were.
Since there are more non-believers than believers, then I guess when we look at the population as a whole, I would say I imagine more folk will go to heaven than not. I think more will go than not too but I don't think it is becuase there are more non-believers. I just don't think its that complicated, like you promote, its pretty simple. And I agree with you that it isn't easy, but I don't think His expectations are too high for the majority of us to succeed. Thanks for sharing. ABE: What about that whole narrow is the path to heaven thing? Edited by Catholic Scientist, : note ABE
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
I think that ties in with much of the message of the Bible and is meant to get our attention. The path IS wide. I believe there are probaly many paths as a matter of fact. But we will be judged individually, one by one. There is not some freeway with eight lanes all running at maximum speed with no obstructions. It is a tollway and we will each stop at the gate, and either be allowed to pass on or turned back. That's a good take on it, I like it. I always took it to mean that there won't be very many people getting into heaven, which I disagree with, so it was something I've wondered about.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
I still need some other way to express how we will each be judged individually, stopped, questioned and judged, but without the payment connection. Any ideas?
Customs
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
Why, in your words, do you think Customs would be appropriate? Oh, I dunno. I only thought of it because you were asking for something like a tollbooth where we'll be questioned and no payment is needed. I just thought it seemes like customs. I've never considered Judgement to be like customs before you brought that up. But now that i think about it, it is kinda like customs because they decide if they're gonna let you in the country or not. They just use different reasons for the filter. More like "Whats you reson for comming in and what will you be doing?" type of thing. WRT heaven, no one questions why people want to go in or what they'll do, its just whether or not you are allowed in from what you've done before you got to the door. I think customs might do something like that too though, like a background check, and not letting criminals into the country, yeah? But still, there's some differences between Judgement and customs, although I think they are closer thatn Judgement and a tollbooth.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
Did you mean this passage from Matthew 7? Yeah, that's the one. Its a quote from Jesus, right?
Your original take seems to be accurate - why do you disagree with it? Well, I said in Message 100:
quote: Plus, it kinda turns god into an asshole if he sends most of the people he created to hell. Also, maybe I disagree because it is more comforting to believe that its easier for me to get into heaven. I don't like to disagree with Jesus, though, which is why I've always wondered about that line. I always figured I wasn't understanding it correctly in the interpretation that it means that less people get into heaven than don't. I like the interpretation that jar provided that it could be describing how the judgement will be on a an individual level so the gate is narrow, exept, in the quote you provided it specifically says few will get in. I'll have to read the whole chapter to really know how I feel about it. Thanks for supplying the info.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
Very interesting and a good analogy. Keep working on it and if you find something better will you let me know? Absolutely.
For example, will it more like Ellis Island or the Pre-1991 Canadian Border? lol, I dunno. I think I'm gonna have to read the Bible and think about it....when I have time. (I'm at work right now o.O)
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
Its the person who cannot pass customs that is the asshole. The customs are just enforcing the standard. But if god makes the standard so high that most people can't pass it then he is being mean about it. I think he should remain just, but I don't think the standard is set that high. I think if we just be good then everthing will be alright. The assholes do choose to be bad so I get what your saying, but I'm not a determinist so I do have some trouble with why YOU think this way. WRT determinism, the asshole don't really have a choice to be bad so this makes god look like an even bigger asshole.
However, if your understanding of heaven was eternal bliss and hell, eternal torment, then I doubt that even 80% in and 20% out (of heaven) would provide comfort (like, reversing the directions the respective gates take a person). Would you undertake a car journey in which you only had an 80% chance of surviving? I doubt it. But you would be content to ride in a gospel of same odds when your eternal destination is at stake? This doesn't add up. Thats a poop analogy. Car journeys ARE very dangerous. As far as the journey being 80% successful, that depends on whether or not I have an affect on this. Can I increase the chances by driving safetly or is it that there's an 20% chance of a tire popping (something have no control over). If I have no control over it then you're right that I wouldn't take the chance, but if I was in control then I would take it. Make sense?
This gospel exists of course. But you don't plump for that gospel on the basis of the comfort it provides. Why is that? Which gospel? What are you Jesus refers to himself as "the gate". He also refers to himself as "the way"...the only way through which a man comes to the father. This parallels closely the narrow gate and path does it not? Sure.
The gate needs to be found. The problem is not dealing with customs (which supposes that arrival at the gate is automatic) it is finding customs in the first place. The implication is that the exhortation to enter throught the narrow gate is a function of finding it here. That's an interesting and respectable perspective but I disagree. I was shown the gate very early in life and had no trouble finding it. The difficulty is in passing the customs, when I choose to go against god. I've found that I am a good person and when I add this to my faith in Jesus I realize that I am going to go to heaven. No problem.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
I think we are, but don't know the difference. You can have sin and not be damned. Being born into sin isn't as bad as being born damned, IMO.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
New Cat's Eye Inactive Member |
I can't imagine any plausible explanation There's always Goddidit but what about hyperdecomposition?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024