You're missing the point about science
I lovingly disagree. The point, I think, that is being missed here is that "scientists" believe what they see, through much testing and retesting to proove or disproove their theory or what-have-you. The
just reading text
you refer to is called history and unlike the science of which you speak this actually has eyewitness accounts which IS the best proof of all. That kind of proof can NOT be denied. Your experiments, on the other hand, are in a matter of speaking in the eye of the beholder.
[This message has been edited by Zachariah, 04-09-2004]
[This message has been edited by Zachariah, 04-09-2004]