Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,920 Year: 4,177/9,624 Month: 1,048/974 Week: 7/368 Day: 7/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Examples of non-Christian Moral systems.
custard
Inactive Member


Message 36 of 296 (119397)
06-28-2004 3:38 AM
Reply to: Message 33 by purpledawn
06-27-2004 3:06 PM


Re: Thanks for the input so far.
from Purple's link writes:
The best argument would be the one about ethical laws, for it is true that traditional Native American morality shares similarities to the Ten Commandments (not stealing, not murdering, and not committing adultery). However, it would be hard to envision an ancient society in which stealing, murdering, and adultery were encouraged.
What a crock. Unless this is used to argue that even North American indigens engaged in moral relativism since many tribes actually encouraged killing, stealing, rape, and adultery - as long as it was perpetrated on another tribe.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by purpledawn, posted 06-27-2004 3:06 PM purpledawn has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 42 by purpledawn, posted 06-28-2004 9:09 AM custard has replied

  
custard
Inactive Member


Message 37 of 296 (119400)
06-28-2004 3:57 AM
Reply to: Message 14 by Hangdawg13
06-27-2004 2:45 AM


Re: The 8 fold path and rational morals
The problem is that when people are left to their own devices (without authority of any kind), they have no interest in rational behavior or "enlightened" self-interest, but only self (not humanity in general either just self).
Ultimately, people have been left to their own devices, independent of one god, and yet they continue to create codes of conduct (and morality) which are often very similar to the codes and morals of other societies to which they have never been exposed. Why is that?
Humans are by nature social animals; so we are very rarely left to our own, individual devices. Since what we do can impact the others with whom we live and work, our societies form codes and rules for what types of behaviors are acceptable regardless of the deity that society professes to worship.
Even prison populations, and if ever there were a godless society there you have it, develop codes of behavior to which its members are expected to adhere or face the consequences.
The point is, we cannot live in a state of anarchy and live in a society simulataneously. Therefore codes of conduct are developed. Most of these codes are in the self-interest of the individual, so it is not surprising that we see ideas such as 'do not murder,' and 'do not steal' as archetypal across cultures.
Add to this the concept that those who do not adhere to the codes of society are 'bad' members of society, while those who do are 'good;' and of a sudden you have morality attached to what was originally common sense and self-preservation.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Hangdawg13, posted 06-27-2004 2:45 AM Hangdawg13 has not replied

  
custard
Inactive Member


Message 47 of 296 (119680)
06-28-2004 7:12 PM
Reply to: Message 42 by purpledawn
06-28-2004 9:09 AM


Re: Thanks for the input so far.
Unlike the OT!
Wouldn't a society have to have a moral system before it can have moral relativism?
Yes.
Do you know of a society that doesn't practice moral relativism?
No. And I didn't mean to imply otherwise. In fact, the opposite was my intention.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 42 by purpledawn, posted 06-28-2004 9:09 AM purpledawn has not replied

  
custard
Inactive Member


Message 56 of 296 (120371)
06-30-2004 1:37 PM
Reply to: Message 53 by jar
06-30-2004 1:06 PM


Re: Almeyda
Actually, I doubt that you can find many conflicts in the last 2000 years that were NOT driven by one of the Judaic nations.
Are you counting Turkey, China, Vietnam, India, Pakistan, Iran, Iraq, Myanmar, Japan, Egypt, and Syria as Judaic nations?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by jar, posted 06-30-2004 1:06 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by jar, posted 06-30-2004 1:47 PM custard has replied

  
custard
Inactive Member


Message 59 of 296 (120376)
06-30-2004 1:44 PM
Reply to: Message 57 by jar
06-30-2004 1:37 PM


Re: Almeyda
History shows us, unfortunately, that the Judaic based religions, have been the least moral, least tolerant of any of the religions ever created.
What? I challenge that. The mongols, huns, goths, celts, Persians, Indian Aryans... there are plenty of examples of cultures and religions which were just as intolerant, or moreso, than Judaic based religions.
Lots of countries have liquidated entire populations. That's about as intolerant as it gets.
This message has been edited by custard, 06-30-2004 12:45 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by jar, posted 06-30-2004 1:37 PM jar has not replied

  
custard
Inactive Member


Message 63 of 296 (120403)
06-30-2004 2:26 PM
Reply to: Message 60 by jar
06-30-2004 1:47 PM


Re: Almeyda
I have had a hard time coming to grips with the Shinto belief system. That has not been for lack of effort, but rather the fact that it really does seem ammoral at base. IMHO, much of the horror that resulted from the rise of Japanese Imperialism can be laid at the doorstep of Shintoism.
Interesting. I never really thought about that before.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by jar, posted 06-30-2004 1:47 PM jar has not replied

  
custard
Inactive Member


Message 64 of 296 (120404)
06-30-2004 2:29 PM
Reply to: Message 60 by jar
06-30-2004 1:47 PM


Re: Almeyda
Another question Jar,
Would you consider the USSR a Judaic state?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by jar, posted 06-30-2004 1:47 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 65 by jar, posted 06-30-2004 2:32 PM custard has replied

  
custard
Inactive Member


Message 68 of 296 (120420)
06-30-2004 2:46 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by jar
06-30-2004 2:32 PM


Re: USSR????
1-Even though it was an athiest state?
What the current status is will show up over time.
I don't understand. Do you mean that states that were once non-Judaic can't become Judaic and vice-versa?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by jar, posted 06-30-2004 2:32 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by jar, posted 06-30-2004 2:51 PM custard has replied

  
custard
Inactive Member


Message 93 of 296 (120584)
07-01-2004 3:07 AM
Reply to: Message 69 by jar
06-30-2004 2:51 PM


Re: USSR????
T%he Soviet Union was Athiestic.
That was my point. USSR, an athiest state, perpetrated some of the most heinous acts of murder and genocide in the 20th century.
I was using that as an example to your challenge to come up with any non-Judaic states that began, were responsible for war and/or aggression over the last 2000 years.
You responded that Russia was a Judaic state, so I was confused.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by jar, posted 06-30-2004 2:51 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 95 by jar, posted 07-01-2004 3:17 AM custard has not replied
 Message 102 by contracycle, posted 07-01-2004 8:27 AM custard has replied

  
custard
Inactive Member


Message 94 of 296 (120589)
07-01-2004 3:13 AM
Reply to: Message 91 by Hangdawg13
07-01-2004 12:58 AM


Re: this is not a bash or defend Christians thread...
Just curious what atrocities are the Jews responsible for?
They killed Jesus, make matzoh with the blood of Christian children, and run the international jewish conspiracy which, with the masons, templars, the illuminati, and the Carlysle Group, are responsible for roughly 97% of the word's tragedies - including AIDS (wait that was Ronald Reagan).
Seriously though, ask the Palestinians or the British who tried to govern Palestine until the Jewish and Arab terrorists made them bail altogether.
If you believe in the bible, the Jews killed all sorts of peoples. Look what they did to the poor Midianites.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 91 by Hangdawg13, posted 07-01-2004 12:58 AM Hangdawg13 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 107 by crashfrog, posted 07-01-2004 8:47 AM custard has replied

  
custard
Inactive Member


Message 103 of 296 (120684)
07-01-2004 8:32 AM
Reply to: Message 102 by contracycle
07-01-2004 8:27 AM


Re: USSR????
1- What the hell are you talking about?
2-Have you even read this thread?
3-Are you saying Pol Pott had no responsibility for the deaths of nearly 3 million people?
This message has been edited by custard, 07-01-2004 07:33 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by contracycle, posted 07-01-2004 8:27 AM contracycle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 104 by contracycle, posted 07-01-2004 8:37 AM custard has replied

  
custard
Inactive Member


Message 106 of 296 (120692)
07-01-2004 8:45 AM
Reply to: Message 104 by contracycle
07-01-2004 8:37 AM


Re: USSR????
No, I'm saying that the CIA needs to take responsibility for the actions of their plant.
1- I'm not surprised you have uncovered yet another conspiracy. I understand why you hate the US, I would too if I weren't a citizen of the greatest free republic on the face of the earth; so I certainly don't blame your envy.
2- This has nothing to do with what Jar and I were talking about. We were discussing war and aggression by Judaic and non-Judaic states. Jar wrote this:
jar writes:
Actually, I doubt that you can find many conflicts in the last 2000 years that were NOT driven by one of the Judaic nations.
I gave him several examples including the Soviet Union as examples of non-Judaic nations that created conflict. Your comment was a non-sequiter.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by contracycle, posted 07-01-2004 8:37 AM contracycle has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by Dr Jack, posted 07-01-2004 9:07 AM custard has replied
 Message 111 by contracycle, posted 07-01-2004 9:12 AM custard has replied

  
custard
Inactive Member


Message 108 of 296 (120702)
07-01-2004 9:02 AM
Reply to: Message 107 by crashfrog
07-01-2004 8:47 AM


The Romans crucified him. If it weren't for Judas and the Pharisees who turned him in, he wouldn't have been crucified, right or wrong?
And (for bonus points) the Pharisees were:
A- Jews
B- Democrats
C- Other
D- I prefer not to enroll

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by crashfrog, posted 07-01-2004 8:47 AM crashfrog has not replied

  
custard
Inactive Member


Message 110 of 296 (120709)
07-01-2004 9:09 AM
Reply to: Message 109 by Dr Jack
07-01-2004 9:07 AM


Re: Envy the US? LOL
I know you envy our dental care.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by Dr Jack, posted 07-01-2004 9:07 AM Dr Jack has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 124 by nator, posted 07-02-2004 9:45 AM custard has not replied

  
custard
Inactive Member


Message 112 of 296 (120712)
07-01-2004 9:17 AM
Reply to: Message 111 by contracycle
07-01-2004 9:12 AM


Re: USSR????
Right, and predictably, you attributed to the USSR things for which it was not responsible;
The USSR was not responsible for Red October? It wasn't responsible for Stalin and the gulags? The USSR didn't crush rebellions in Hungary and the Czech/Slovakia republics? The USSR didn't invade Afghanistan? Are you freaking serious?
Where does the fault for those events lie? With the CIA plant?
This message has been edited by custard, 07-01-2004 08:18 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by contracycle, posted 07-01-2004 9:12 AM contracycle has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024