The TRVE history of the Flood...

OK, yes, EXCEPT for the Great Unconformity. All the strata above that point were in place before the tectonic disturbance that followed.

That's a pretty big exception, especially given that you are looking at a limited area with only a few examples.The evidence doesn't really confirm that the Claron formation was deposited before the tilt at the far north occurred either. And I don't know how you can say whether the fault at Vermilion Cliffs occurred after the Kayenta formation and later strata were deposited to the North of it or not.Which leaves you remarkably little evidence for even a local claim excepting the Great Unconformity.

That's exactly what the bible says:

quote:

---

Genesis 6:7 And the Lord said, I will destroy man whom I have created from the face of the earth; both man, and beast, and the creeping thing, and the fowls of the air; for it repenteth me that I have made them.

---

quote:

---

Genesis 6:13 And God said unto Noah, The end of all flesh is come before me; for the earth is filled with violence through them; and, behold, I will destroy them with the earth.

---

And you reject all reality and truth based one what fantasy Faith?

And you reject all reality and truth based one what fantasy Faith?

And you reject all reality and truth based one what fantasy Faith?

And you reject all reality and truth based one what fantasy Faith?

They are obvious differences in the geological column. Any valid theory must account for them. No matter what you call them.If they have nothing to do with your views then you have no hypothesis about what caused them and the rest of the geologic column.Edited by JonF, : No reason given.Edited by JonF, : No reason given.

Good grief this is craziness. I'm talking about the DATING which has nothing to do with the Flood. Duh. Duh. Duh. But if you want my view of the iridium layer it was carried on the Flood water and deposited on top of the layer where it got called the KT boundary.

Have you looked at the topic of this thread?Boy, that sure is some magic water-like substance! That amount and isotopic distribution of iridium didn't come from Earth.

.. at the Grand Canyon.

In your story, yes. I have. What does that have to do with anything? Of course not, it's a normal every day event. It's not a tsunami.

Naivete is not one of my strong points. As you wish. However, I don't see any of these things producing a flood. Okay, so that's your story. Well, reading YEC stories does get confusing. Thank you. Hey, I can only know what you guys tell me about a fanciful event. Most tsunamis are less than that and do a lot of damage. That's not the point. But since I don't really care, I can't remember why I mentioned that. That's nice. But not really relevant. None of them would flood the earth. And I have been to some of them. Do you understand where the water coming from these springs comes from? Few things would give me more pleasure.I think... Well, in that case, you are both wrong. There is no evidence to suggest that such a thing happened.Edited by edge, : No reason given.

Every time you deny the glaring evidence I have to remind you:Strata and Fossils. In-your-face evidence.

The irony.Fossils of trilobites sorted with radioactive isotopes in thick layers with different trilobite species and different isotopes, ... how does that happen? Billions of years of gradual accumulation, or magic?If you don't have a scientific explanation you are invoking magic.Lacking is any mixing of species and isotope sediments that would occur with a flying flood fantasy that terraforms the earth to current day appearance in less than a thousand years.Unless you invoke magic.If you don't have a scientific explanation you are invoking magic.Enjoy