The TRVE history of the Flood...

One of the best ways of making a name for yourself in the scientific community is to challenge a widely held scientific understanding with a strongly defended alternative theory. It is thus of considerable significance that the tens of thousands of geologists worldwide are virtually in complete agreement that the question of the earth's age has been answered: roughly 4.6 billion years.The agreement is perhaps even more striking in the world of economic geology (oil and mineral exploration) where theories that lead to increased revenue always win, even if philosophically distasteful. Understanding the age of the earth and its layers plays a critical role in natural resource exploration, yet to our knowledge there is not a single oil or mining company anywhere in the world that uses a young-earth model to find or exploit new reserves. Old-earth models work. Young-earth models do not.

Faith writes:No you do not "know" any such thing.

Faith writes:All that changes in what I said is that it gives the cause of the loss of function as a mutation. Loss of function is the opposite of new information. It is exactly what we would expect of mutations though, of course, destructive rather than productive. This is not what we are led to expect of evolution, however. All change is not evolution.
Besides that you have the usual definitional problem that plagues evolutionism. The built-in changes called "microevolution" in fact account for ALL observed changes. The ToE is pure conjecture, never demonstrated, and can't be demonstrated.

davidjay writes:No offense, but most evolutionists according to their mindset would have to say that their is no mathematics and design to the Great Pyramid of Enoch. I differ, you would to if you do the research.

CRR writes:Of course when dealing with a past event like this it can be difficult to determine exactly what happened. This is a difficulty with all the historical sciences.

Faith writes:But it does not look like it was carved out by a river. the narrow parts maybe but not the wide parts.

Faith writes:Walther's Law itself is such an evidence, because it shows that the layers accumulate one on top of another in a relatively short period of time, as sea level rises, really just about simultaneously.

Davidjay writes:...You suggested I NOT start a new thread on Continental Drift, and debating it with evolutionists...

DavidjayI shall start this other topic HERE, even though it happened 130 years after the Flood, as evolutionists deal with the guesswork of millions and billions of years of slow tetonic changes rather than the catstrophic ones seen by Darwin and Viekosky, etc etc etc etc, and another etc.

CRR writes:Even Everest has marine fossils in the top strata...

Faith writes:My view is that the high mountains were pushed up after the Flood by the tectonic force that started Continental Drift.