|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 58 (9200 total) |
| |
Allysum Global | |
Total: 919,266 Year: 6,523/9,624 Month: 101/270 Week: 14/83 Day: 0/8 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The TRVE history of the Flood... | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 396 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
If you have any mathematical or logical proof, present it here.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 396 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Yeah, the archetype of looney tunes.
COSMOS WITHOUT GRAVITATION is especially risible.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 396 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Of course no claim of rapid continental "drift" will be considered without at least a reasonable estimate of the heat produced and its effects.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 396 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Actually, Mount Everest contains marine fossils in the highest of the exposed sequences. Leonardo da Vinci realized that the fossils on mountaintops could not have been placed by a catastrophic flood. Creationists are still centuries behind. http://www.ucmp.berkeley.edu/history/vinci.html
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 396 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Let me guess: Leonardo was thinking only of the water covering the current mountain heights?
No, he realized that the fossils on mountain heights could not have been deposited by a flood because they were obviously mostly intact in the places where they lived, and the mountains must have been raised after the fossils were deposited.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 396 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
But in evolutionary theory, where there are no catastrophic events BZZZT! Wrong. Here's a copy of the home game, thanks for playing.
the mountains must have risen inch by inch just as with the demented continental drift theory Yep, they did. I'm not interested in your un-evidenced assertions. Edited by JonF, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 396 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Evolutionists deny anything catastrophic
Nope. However we do deny catastrophic plate tectonics because we don't see the obvious and inescapable side effects; the surface of the Earth molten and all life destroyed (except perhaps for some thermphilic bacteria).
1,000x5280x12=63,360,000 years
Units matter. 1000 miles x 5280 feet/mile x 12 inches/foot = 6,360 inches. Which proves you can convert 1,00 miles to inches, and nothing more. Congratulations! Nobody has claimed any plate is moving an inch per year. Edited by JonF, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 396 days) Posts: 6174 Joined:
|
FWIW and considering you are unlikely to get an answer, the pollen is probably the old PRATT about the incompetent Clifford Burdick. See Chadwick's PRECAMBRIAN POLLEN IN THE GRAND CANYON A REEXAMINATION.
There is evidence of grasses in the Cretaceous. Dinosaurs Dined on Grass, Dinosaur Coprolites and the Early Evolution of Grasses and Grazers. Don't see how this gives anyt comfort to creationists.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 396 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
The first thing I noticed about this occurrence is that nothing has been published since the 1960's when it was first announced. PRECAMBRIAN POLLEN IN THE GRAND CANYON A REEXAMINATIONPrecambrian Pollen The guy who collected the pollen is famous for incompetence.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 396 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Which has nothing to do with Burdick's claims that the pollen indicates a young Earth..
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 396 days) Posts: 6174 Joined:
|
The "working hypothesis" is known as Uniformitarianism No, it isn't.
since we know things were very very different before the Flood, immensely more favorable to growing things, we ain't buying it. We do not know that. Your allegedly infallible interpretation of the Bible is the only evidence for that, and as pointed out above real-world evidence shows that to be untrue. Water was water. Gravity was gravity. Water didn't sort fossils in the observed order.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 396 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
You know there are thousands of black smokers in the oceans that spew out superheated water of 350c constantly. And the world doesn't flood. Gosh. They can't be the fountains of the deep unless they suddenly started spewing out orders of magnitude more water. Why and how would that happen? What would the water temperature be if enough of that water were added to flood the Earth? What would the temperature be aboard the alleged Ark? (The correct notation is 350 C).
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 396 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Couldn't be that you have the wrong idea about how the laws of physics work in such a situation. Yep, couldn't be. We know the laws of physics very well. We know how water affects things very well. We know how gravity works very well.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 396 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Any hole in the earth is a fountain whether it spews out cold water, hot water, or molten rock. Ok, if you want to define it that way. But then you have no evidence of any of those holes producing water in the quantity required. Calling them fountains is just labeling.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 396 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
There is no such thing as the KT or PT boundaries There are world-wide features that we have labeled "KT boundary" and "PT boundary". If you want to call them something else, make sure you are clear about what you mean and bend extra effort to communicate effectively. But they do exist, no matter how we label them.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024