|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 57 (9189 total) |
| |
Michaeladams | |
Total: 918,946 Year: 6,203/9,624 Month: 51/240 Week: 66/34 Day: 3/6 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The TRVE history of the Flood... | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 602 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Faith writes:
Rivers are the result of lots of little deluges and occasionally slightly bigger ones. We have rivers and we have deluges, so we know how these things work. What we do NOT have is any justification for extrapolating to one really really big deluge.
Of course the river is a clue. It's what's left of the huge deluge....
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 602 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Faith writes:
Those straight flat contacts indicate that they were NOT deposited by a violent cataclysm. Violence would mix the layers. All those strata piled miles deep for starters, most of them so neatly distinguished from one another by straight flat contacts. The layers can be explained by the normal events that we see happening every day.
Faith writes:
The amazing size of a tree suggests that it took a long time to get that big.
And the amazing size of the Grand Canyon for another.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 602 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Faith writes:
Does that include layers that are not sedimentary?
The strata have all the earmarks of following Walther's Law....
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 602 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
Faith writes:
If your "explanation" doesn't explain non-sedementary layers, then it isn't an explanation.
No.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 602 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
Faith writes:
For at least a millennium of that, they were Catholics.
I have two millennia of the best Bible exegetes behind me.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 602 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
Faith writes:
So name the "best exegetes" of Protestant theology between AD 500 and 1500.
That is RCC false history.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 602 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Faith writes:
But that's like arguing aerodynamics with a pilot. When you don't know what you're talking about, your opinion doesn't need to be counted.
... we dispute the validity of the theories on both sides that account for this or that. And that's the whole debate.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 602 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
Faith writes:
So it isn't strictly honest to say you have two millennia of the best Bible exegetes behind you. You have a thousand-year gap.
There really aren't any Protestant theologians during that period so basically I skip it in my list of exegetes;
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 602 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Faith writes:
That's right, there is no debate as far as science is concerned. Your silly notions were disproved more than a century ago. The reason this site exists is to prevent you from forcing your silly notions on innocent schoolchildren.
Then there is no debate you see.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 602 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Faith writes:
Curse you for making me read the rules.
In that case we need to invoke Rule 10 against you.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 602 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
Faith writes:
And vice versa: If the Bible disagrees with what we observe in the real world, then the Bible isn't true.
If the Bible is the truth then what it says about things in the real world can be used as evidence for those things and against contradictory statements about those things.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 602 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
CRR writes:
Can you give some examples of talking snakes in history?
Gen 1-11 reads as history....
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 602 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
Faith writes:
How can you set aside real-world-observations in a science forum? We're not arguing opinions here. We're arguing facts.
That's why I was suggesting putting aside these assumptions on both sides because it's a big waste of time to keep going back and forth like this.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 602 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined:
|
CRR writes:
I cheered your statement because it's true. People learn easier if they are taught rather than abused for being ignorant. However, creationists tend to be fiercely militant in their ignorance. When you're on an airplane, do you go up to the cockpit and tell the pilot he's flying wrong? If not, why would you tell people who have studied science for decades that they're wrong?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ringo Member (Idle past 602 days) Posts: 20940 From: frozen wasteland Joined: |
Davidjay writes:
If that was true, they'd be teaching creationism in the public schools instead of evolution.
Its easy to defeat evolutionists....
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024