|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The Power of the New Intelligent Design... | |||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 102 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Dredge writes:
There is a MASSIVE gap between ediacaran and cambrian radiations that evolution can't (sensibly) explain away ... the predicted evolutionary links between ediacaran and cambrian are virtually non-existent ...Taq writes:
Wake me up when the missing fossils are discovered ... meanwhile I'll continue to believe that the Cambrian explosion presents a major problem for the theory of evolution and UCD.
Prove to us that they are non-existent. Show us every single fossil that is in the Earth right now.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 102 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Dredge writes:
you know how evolution works, choose one evolutionary transition from the fossil record and describe how it happened.Taq writes:
You're getting a bit ahead of yourself, old chap .... "evolutionary mechanisms" is the best scientific explanation, but you can't prove that that explanation is correct. Claiming, as you do, that your explanation is a proven fact is typical of the lies that Darwinoids tell.
So the physical differences between humans and chimps is due to evolutionary mechanismswe can even see the transitional steps in the fossil record.
The array of skulls depicted in the image you supplied is meant to portray the"transitional steps in the fossil record" , but all you've done is provide yet another shameful example of Darwinoid dishonesty. What Darwinoids don't tell readers about that image is that: 1. Not all the skulls are not found in the fossil record in the same (alleged) evolutionary sequence depicted in the image. The (alleged) evolutionary sequence is therefore patently fraudulent. 2. Some of the skulls are tiny relative to the size of some of the other skulls. It's like comparing the skull of a marmoset to the skull of a gorilla. 3. There is nothing remotely "evolutionary" about the skeletons belonging to any of the non-human skulls in that image ... skeletons that are no closer to human than any of the non-human primates we see today.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 102 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
unwise1 writes:
I accept the scientific evidence that suggests life on earth has gone thru dramatic changes ... that it has "evolved".
BTW, in that video she states outright that the reason she accepts evolution is because of the data -- the data that Dredge keeps trying to deny.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 102 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
unwise1 writes:
What is the "data" that I keep trying to deny?
BTW, in that video she states outright that the reason she accepts evolution is because of the data -- the data that Dredge keeps trying to deny.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 102 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
APauling666 writes:
You forgot to mention that the biological sciences as taught at most universities are seriously tainted and distorted by Atheism's preferred creation story ... Darwinism.
Or, better, go to your local university, take a semester of biology, evolution or genetics. When you're done come back here and we'll discuss what you learned.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 102 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
unwise1 writes:
Everyone knows so-called evangelical so-called churches harbour disproportionate numbers of fruit-cakes and nut-jobs.
Another example of how creationists' and religious fanatics' abject ignorance of science keeps them from understanding the truth comes from a fundamentalist conspiracy theory site from the 90's, Cutting Edge Ministries at http://www.cuttingedge.org/NEWS/n1260.cfm (link broken):
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 102 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
unwise1 writes:
And a large part of the cure for Darwinist bullshit is honesty.
And a large part of the cure for creationist stupidity is education.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 102 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Dredge writes:
You need similarities to form a nested hierarchy.Taq writes:
In that case, any two organisms could form a nested hierarchy. A bacterium and a human being form a nested hierarchy ... wait, where have I heard that before?
And that's what living species have, similarities.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 102 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Where would Darwinism be without its army of liars ?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 102 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Dredge writes:
I'm claiming that the massive gap in morphology and function between pre-C and C biota is not consistent with the theory of evolution.Taq writes:
You're in denial. If huge evolutionary gaps in the fossil record aren't real, explain why dDawkins wrote this: You haven't demonstrated that this gap is real. "Eldredge and Gould certainly would agree that some very important gaps really are due to imperfections in the fossil record. Very big gaps, too. For example the Cambrian strata of rocks, vintage about 600 million years, are the oldest ones in which we find most of the major invertebrate groups. And we find many of them already in an advanced state of evolution, the very first time they appear. It is as though they were just planted there, without any evolutionary history ...My point here is that, when we are talking about gaps of this magnitude, there is no difference whatever in the interpretations of 'punctuationists' and 'gradualists'." (Dawkins, Richard, "The Blind Watchmaker," [1986], Penguin: London, 1991 reprint, p.229-230)
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 102 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
APauling666 writes:
No ... but I once visited an unnatural history museum.
Have you ever been to a natural history museum? If you go you can actually see some of these lacking transitionals.
... just like if I go to Disney Land I can actually see Mickey Mouse.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 102 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Dredge writes:
What's lacking, viz-a-viz the theory of evolution, are fossil links between the various phyla ...APauling666 writes:
Your ignorance-ridden delusion is APauling.
Not lacking, but, unknown to you.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 102 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
You evaded my question ... in other words, you don't know that humans descended from bacteria. So, as usual, you're full of it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 102 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
Dredge writes:
I accept that nested hierarchies exist within phyla.Taq writes:
I neither accept nor deny common ancestry within phyla. Like everyone else, I don't know what happened.
So you accept common ancestry of phyla?Apparently you are unaware of the genetic evidence which forms a nested hierarchy between the phyla.
Genetic evidence can be interpreted as all life forming a nested hierarchy ... or as the Creator using the same biological blueprint to fashion all life ... or both.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Dredge Member (Idle past 102 days) Posts: 2850 From: Australia Joined: |
[Taq]When someone says that a theory has been proven true it is in the same sense that someone is proven guilty in a court of law.[/qs]
Which scientific theory "has been proven true"?
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024