Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The TRUE reason for the EvC controversy, and why it can not be resolved.
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 23 of 302 (297571)
03-23-2006 12:16 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by compmage
03-23-2006 11:16 AM


If you use absolute uniformitarianism as only as a methodological constrain to find our origins, without actually holding it as a world view, aren't you practicing doublethink?
Your scientific information is a few decades out of date. Absolute uniformatarianism hasn't been the dominant view in geology for some time. And as well it shouldn't - we've observed that the processes that operate today are entirely capable, under the right circumstances, of causing catastrophic events.
The dominant principle of geology today is a kind of uniformatarianism that recognizes the role of catastrophe in shaping the geologic landscape. It's merely the application of the general idea that the present is the key to the past. We have observations stretching back 2 billion years that support the merit of this methodology.
(In regards to "doublethink", the ideas have to actually be mutually contradictory for it to be doublethink. There's nothing mutually contradictory about the two ideas "we're going to accept this proposition on a provisional basis as part of a methodology" and "this proposition may not be true.")

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by compmage, posted 03-23-2006 11:16 AM compmage has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by compmage, posted 03-24-2006 2:00 AM crashfrog has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 295 of 302 (299338)
03-29-2006 12:23 PM
Reply to: Message 294 by Faith
03-29-2006 11:41 AM


Re: Evolution vs Creation goes beyond philosophy
Do you think that at least we should be spared paying taxes for the public schools if we finance our own schools or are you going to bleed us from every pore?
Good public schools in your neighborhood improve the value of your property regardless of whether or not you actually have children enrolled. Do you really believe that paying for that benefit is wrong? Or are you simply so short-sighted that you see yourself benefiting from public schools only if you have children enrolled?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 294 by Faith, posted 03-29-2006 11:41 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 296 by Faith, posted 03-29-2006 12:26 PM crashfrog has replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1497 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 299 of 302 (299379)
03-29-2006 2:40 PM
Reply to: Message 296 by Faith
03-29-2006 12:26 PM


Re: Evolution vs Creation goes beyond philosophy
Nobody can afford to support two school systems.
Hrm, I guess you're right. That must be why there are no private schools whatsoever, anywhere in the United States. Oh, wait.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 296 by Faith, posted 03-29-2006 12:26 PM Faith has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024