Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,920 Year: 4,177/9,624 Month: 1,048/974 Week: 7/368 Day: 7/11 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The TRUE reason for the EvC controversy, and why it can not be resolved.
ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 24 of 302 (297572)
03-23-2006 12:19 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by compmage
03-23-2006 11:33 AM


Gone full circle writes:
I fail, however, to see how a Christian, who believes in Jesus and all the mirricles that goes with him, the Second Comming, and heaven and hell, and everything else that is unscientific and unprovable in the bible, object to genesis, simply because science says so.
Miracles, the second coming, heaven and hell are completely beside the point. A few professing "Christians" have missed the point of Christianity and focussed on those side issues.
The "TRUE" reason for the controversy is the failure of a few to understand what Christianity truly is.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by compmage, posted 03-23-2006 11:33 AM compmage has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by robinrohan, posted 03-23-2006 12:28 PM ringo has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 26 of 302 (297577)
03-23-2006 12:34 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by robinrohan
03-23-2006 12:28 PM


robinrohan writes:
And what might Christianity truly be?
At the risk of diverting the topic:
Christainity truly is (like every other religion) a means for human beings to get along with each other. Hence, "Love thy neighbour as thyself".
The "supernatural" aspects are just smoke and mirrors.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by robinrohan, posted 03-23-2006 12:28 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by robinrohan, posted 03-23-2006 1:00 PM ringo has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 33 of 302 (297707)
03-24-2006 2:57 AM
Reply to: Message 31 by compmage
03-24-2006 2:28 AM


Re: I'm not debating EvC, I'm debating the nature of the EvC debate.
My point is that the controversy is not about "worldviews" or "philosophy".
It's about the failure of a few professing Christians to think critically. They fail to think critically about science and they also fail to think critically about religion.
Is the "no true Christian" fallacy your only argument?

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 31 by compmage, posted 03-24-2006 2:28 AM compmage has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by compmage, posted 03-24-2006 3:19 AM ringo has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 42 of 302 (297717)
03-24-2006 3:44 AM
Reply to: Message 36 by compmage
03-24-2006 3:19 AM


The brain is not just insulation
Gone full circle writes:
Are you a Christian?
I never answer that question. It isn't your place to judge me.
If not, I do not see the point to debate christianity with you.
By that kind of logic: if you're not an evolutionist, why should anybody debate evolution with you?
I'd like to know what criteria you use in your "critical though" to determine whether an event in the bible is true or not.
Like anything else, you need outside corroboration to determine "truth". If we can see in the geologic record that a worldwide flood never happened, then we need to re-evaluate our interpretation of Genesis. Maybe it isn't mere history after all. Maybe it's more important than that.
You are saying I should be crittical of Genesis 1, but not of Jesus's resurection?
I never said you shouldn't be critical of Jesus' resurrection. You should. The first question you should ask yourself is "What does it mean? - not "Did it happen?"
Do we spare that part of the bible from critical thought, just because without it, you don't have a christian religion?
The Christian religion doesn't rise or fall on whether or not Jesus was a historical personage. It rests on the message He brought.
I fail to see how you make that distinction. It is easier for me to understand how a non-christian can have objections to Genesis 1 than a christian.
It isn't all about making it "easy" for you. If you want "the TRUE reason" to be easy, you're liable to be disappointed.
Faith is to believe and trust God like a child.
Exactly.
Faith is to be certain of that which you don't see.
But faith doesn't require you to turn a blind eye to what you can see.
We can see a lot of how the world works and what we see tells us that the "fundy" interpretation of the Bible is false. But, instead of rejecting science, that should motivate us to study the Bible more closely.
You'll get a lot more out of it if you don't start with an anti-science attitude.
If you think that makes me stupid....
No. I think that makes you a lazy thinker.
By not thinking critically, you not only miss the beauty of the Creation - including the beauty of evolution - but you also miss most of the point of the Bible.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by compmage, posted 03-24-2006 3:19 AM compmage has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by compmage, posted 03-24-2006 4:28 AM ringo has replied
 Message 47 by robinrohan, posted 03-24-2006 6:29 AM ringo has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 61 of 302 (297787)
03-24-2006 11:15 AM
Reply to: Message 44 by compmage
03-24-2006 4:28 AM


Re: The brain is not just insulation
Gone full circle writes:
The purpose was to discover if we have common ground. Without it, a debate on christianity will lead nowhere.
We can discover common ground as we go along, like we would in any other debate.
I became aware that many non-Christian experience Christians as "holier than thou". I sure hope that is not how I'm comming accross....
How do you think it comes across if you say this person is not a Christian and that person is not a Christian? If that isn't judgmental, what is?
Read the topic of the debate. I'm not debating evolution with anyone anymore, as I no longer see the point.
Read the title of the site. Debating evolution is what we do here.
If your arguements do not share common ground, they will not have any impact.
I'm not hoping to have any impact on you. I'm hoping to show others the flaws in your thinking.
In other words, you're not a Christian, as you reject the central theme of the religion.
I didn't say I reject anything. I said you should question everything. (Another example of you jumping to a conclusion about who is a Christian. Slow down and think.)
you have to believe it to be true for you to be a christian. Otherwise I can call myself a Redridinghooder if I like the message of Little Red Riding Hood. I suppose I can, but that is not what religion is.
You have to believe certain things to belong to the club called "Christians" - but you don't know what I believe. And "what religion is" is following the message, not just going to the club meetings.
... if science do not apply to the time before the fall, how can we be expected to accurately explain how things happened back then?
"The Fall" has no basis in either science or theology. (It is NOT necessary to believe in "the Fall" to be a Christian.) You're just making up a hypothetical barrier which science can't cross.
... if you reject Genesis 1 because it doesn't fit into a naturalist world view, you're not far off from rejecting the entire bible.
Who's "rejecting" Genesis? I have more respect for Genesis than you do because I don't try to jam it into a narrow pre-conceived interpretation. Which is more important in the long run? Crime and Punishment or last week's New York Times?
There is much more to Genesis than mere history. Please try to understand what it says.
In the end, it comes down to: do you believe nature is a product of Gods creation, or do you believe god is a imaginary creation of nature.
No it doesn't - it comes down to: do you believe the Creation was created by God? If you do, you ought to have enough respect for Him and His creation to look at it.
I completely understand your position. What I'm trying to say is, your position based on science, can not falsify a religion....
Then you completely misunderstand my position. I am not trying to falsify any religion.
I am trying to clarify it. You can not have a clear understanding of your own religion if you try to separate the Creation from the God who created it.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by compmage, posted 03-24-2006 4:28 AM compmage has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 62 of 302 (297788)
03-24-2006 11:19 AM
Reply to: Message 47 by robinrohan
03-24-2006 6:29 AM


Re: The brain is not just insulation
robinrohan writes:
If Jesus was not a "historical personage," I guess it wasn't he that "brought the message."
Bingo. The message is universal. It has always been here.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by robinrohan, posted 03-24-2006 6:29 AM robinrohan has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 83 of 302 (298071)
03-25-2006 1:26 PM
Reply to: Message 82 by kuresu
03-25-2006 11:54 AM


Re: What is GFC saying about the Fall?
kurescu writes:
Can you tell me what's wrong with this picture?
I think what Faith and GFC are trying to say is that we are "fallen" - i.e. "tainted", "damaged goods", etc. - and therefore our entire thinking about science is "warped". It's tantamount to saying that we can never know anything.
Ironically, as I've been trying to tell GFC, that "worldview" is what prevents them from understanding science.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by kuresu, posted 03-25-2006 11:54 AM kuresu has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 84 by Faith, posted 03-25-2006 1:46 PM ringo has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 93 of 302 (298087)
03-25-2006 2:26 PM
Reply to: Message 92 by kuresu
03-25-2006 2:20 PM


kuresu writes:
I think it's more you not getting the logical gap I'm presenting in his logic
If you use the little green Reply button in the lower right-hand corner, we'll know which one of us doesn't "get it".

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 92 by kuresu, posted 03-25-2006 2:20 PM kuresu has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 110 of 302 (298120)
03-25-2006 5:40 PM
Reply to: Message 109 by Faith
03-25-2006 5:18 PM


Re: Science strong in Europe?
Faith writes:
... at EvC being an agnostic or an atheist or a Buddhist doesn't stop anyone from having their own Christian theology.
Somebody has to do it. The loudest self-styled "Christians" here don't know the first thing about theology (which is the TRUE reason for the EvC controversy).

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by Faith, posted 03-25-2006 5:18 PM Faith has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 120 of 302 (298177)
03-25-2006 11:09 PM
Reply to: Message 117 by Faith
03-25-2006 10:32 PM


Re: God and the Fall
Faith writes:
God cannot violate His own laws or His own nature.
Neither can He fail - which is why a "fall" is impossible. No doubt the universe is unfolding as it should - and exactly as planned from the beginning.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by Faith, posted 03-25-2006 10:32 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 122 by Faith, posted 03-25-2006 11:16 PM ringo has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 123 of 302 (298188)
03-25-2006 11:22 PM
Reply to: Message 122 by Faith
03-25-2006 11:16 PM


Re: God and the Fall
Faith writes:
HE didn't fall! WE did!
But that would be a failure on God's part. We are exactly as He intended us to be - not "fallen".
God is not at odds with His creation. The creationists' failure to understand that fact is the TRUE reason for the EvC controversy.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 122 by Faith, posted 03-25-2006 11:16 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 126 by Faith, posted 03-26-2006 12:11 AM ringo has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 129 of 302 (298208)
03-26-2006 12:32 AM
Reply to: Message 126 by Faith
03-26-2006 12:11 AM


Re: God and the Fall
Faith writes:
Fallen humanity sure does like to blame their own faults on God.
We are responsible for what we do. We are not responsible for the fact that we are not perfect. If God gave us free will (the knowledge of good and evil), the imperfection is built into us.
You're the one who's saying that God is so puny that He couldn't control His creation.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by Faith, posted 03-26-2006 12:11 AM Faith has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 159 of 302 (298599)
03-27-2006 9:40 AM
Reply to: Message 156 by compmage
03-27-2006 9:27 AM


Gone full circle writes:
I do not appreciate you being derogative about my believes, while at the same time being secretive about yours....
My beliefs are on record in what I say, if not in what I profess to believe. Your pronouncement of who is a Christian and who is not is extremely condescending and, yes, judgmental.
But nothing you said to me in your last post has anything to do with the topic.
What I have said, from the beginning of the thread, is that the TRUE reason for the EvC controversy is this: creationists look at science in a distorted way because they look at everything in a distorted way - including their own religion. That is pretty clear from your own posts.
(If you want to discuss the real message of Christianity in an appropriate thread, I'll be glad to do so.)

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 156 by compmage, posted 03-27-2006 9:27 AM compmage has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 166 by compmage, posted 03-27-2006 10:28 AM ringo has replied
 Message 214 by ringo, posted 03-27-2006 1:02 PM ringo has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 214 of 302 (298688)
03-27-2006 1:02 PM
Reply to: Message 159 by ringo
03-27-2006 9:40 AM


Deleted: talking to myself. See below.
This message has been edited by Ringo, 2006-03-27 11:26 AM

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 159 by ringo, posted 03-27-2006 9:40 AM ringo has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 443 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 216 of 302 (298701)
03-27-2006 1:29 PM
Reply to: Message 166 by compmage
03-27-2006 10:28 AM


Gone full circle,
In case you're interested in responding to the substance of my last post, Message 159, here it is again:
quote:
What I have said, from the beginning of the thread, is that the TRUE reason for the EvC controversy is this: creationists look at science in a distorted way because they look at everything in a distorted way - including their own religion. That is pretty clear from your own posts.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 166 by compmage, posted 03-27-2006 10:28 AM compmage has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 232 by compmage, posted 03-28-2006 6:58 AM ringo has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024