Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The TRUE reason for the EvC controversy, and why it can not be resolved.
Phat
Member
Posts: 18351
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 35 of 302 (297709)
03-24-2006 3:16 AM
Reply to: Message 34 by compmage
03-24-2006 3:00 AM


Re: I'm not debating EvC, I'm debating the nature of the EvC debate.
GFC writes:
Because of this contrast in world views (Theism vs Naturalism, and non-uniformism vs uniformism) the debate between Creationism and Evolutionism can not be resolved, but it won't go away either.
Do you mean uniformism or uniformitarianism?
nat”u”ral”ism n 1 : action or thought based only on natural desires and instincts 2 : a doctrine that denies a supernatural explanation of the origin or development of the universe and holds that scientific laws account for all of nature 3 : realism in art and literature ” nat”u”ral”is”tic
This message has been edited by Phat, 03-24-2006 01:17 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by compmage, posted 03-24-2006 3:00 AM compmage has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 37 by compmage, posted 03-24-2006 3:21 AM Phat has not replied

Phat
Member
Posts: 18351
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 43 of 302 (297719)
03-24-2006 3:56 AM
Reply to: Message 36 by compmage
03-24-2006 3:19 AM


Re: I'm not debating EvC, I'm debating the nature of the EvC debate.
GFC, would you like an avatar? I have one for you...a mobius strip!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 36 by compmage, posted 03-24-2006 3:19 AM compmage has not replied

Phat
Member
Posts: 18351
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 54 of 302 (297762)
03-24-2006 9:06 AM
Reply to: Message 53 by robinrohan
03-24-2006 8:19 AM


Those naughty Gnostics!
GFC writes:
How many creationists did you convince of evolution by smashing their scientific sounding arguements? Not many, did you. Creationist arguements are almost like that greek dragon: when you chop of one head, two more grows back. Do you think creationism will ever be falsified once and for all? Do you think these people are any less dogmatic in their thought processes than I am? Religion require you to hold certain ideas as "absolute truth" or "dogma" as you call it. Without it, you have atheism. I can't produce any scientific evidence for God's existance. My believe in him is therefore no less dogmatic than my believe in Genesis 1.
Thats why we have a forum with a site with science forums and also faith/belief forums.
Sir Robin of Rohan writes:
I'm not sure what you mean by "Gnostic."
Mr. World Book1999 CD writes:
Gnosticism, pronounced NAHS tuh sihz uhm, was a religious and philosophical movement in Europe and the Middle East that flourished from about the A.D. 100's to the 700's. There were many Christian and non-Christian Gnostic sects. However, they all believed they had secret knowledge about the nature of the universe and the origin and destiny of humanity.
Gnostics believed that people could attain salvation only by acquiring gnosis, a Greek word meaning knowledge. Most Gnostics believed in an unknown and remote Supreme Being.
Yet I beg to differ that most Christians who are not strict literalists are in fact Gnostic.
Around these parts, we have two basic contrasting views among our Christian group:
1) Not all are "saved". God desires that all be saved, however, and He who began the good work is finishing it. Or...
2) Everyone is already saved (on the planet) God has done the work, and it is now up to us to behave appropriately. Just as the Pagans got it before the Pharisees and Sadducees, the atheists/agnostics will get it before the main church folk who are too haughty and exclusivist to see the big picture.
Both sides agree, however, that it is not about a literal Bible in a word for word sense. Some of us disgagree over the origin of the basic thought contained within the Bible and if it can be shown to be cohesive..(Holy Spirit, maybe?) I maintain that it is the character behind the book that is important rather than the book itself.
I disagree that Jesus is not literally necessary to make His philosophy valid. Jesus DOES need to live within us....yet who am I to frame the issue of the characteristics of my Omnipotant God, anyway??

Gradually it was disclosed to me that the line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties either, but right through every human heart, and through all human hearts. This line shifts. Inside us, it oscillates with the years. Even within hearts overwhelmed by evil, one small bridgehead of good is retained; and even in the best of all hearts, there remains a small corner of evil. --Alexander Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by robinrohan, posted 03-24-2006 8:19 AM robinrohan has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by PaulK, posted 03-24-2006 9:46 AM Phat has replied

Phat
Member
Posts: 18351
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 57 of 302 (297772)
03-24-2006 9:59 AM
Reply to: Message 56 by PaulK
03-24-2006 9:46 AM


Re: Those naughty Gnostics!
Hi, Paul. I guess that I can break it down to you as I believe it...(not that I understand much! )
I believe that God created us long before we "created gods". Whether or not we had this instinct to "create gods" and/or be as gods ourselves came from a literal Fall or not is not too terribly important. The facts show that humans are imperfect, prone to ego-centrism, and passionate about unprovable belief systems.
Likeminded believers can always cheerfully agree on most all interpretations of reality---provable or not. The challenge is the debates that are had between differing beliefs!
Gnosticism, as I have always understood it, maintains that the origin of everything---be it God or be it Quantum Physics---can be figured out through human wisdom....in that enlightenment is the end result of continual education.
Personally, I believe that education is a good thing for everyday life but that the deeper questions concerning our origins and our collective destiny will only be known through relationship and impartation from the Holy Spirit.
Of course...how do I or anyone else convince someone who has seen no evidence of the Holy Spirit? Im still praying about that one!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by PaulK, posted 03-24-2006 9:46 AM PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by PaulK, posted 03-24-2006 10:12 AM Phat has not replied

Phat
Member
Posts: 18351
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 60 of 302 (297779)
03-24-2006 10:27 AM
Reply to: Message 59 by robinrohan
03-24-2006 10:19 AM


Re: Those naughty Gnostics!
RR writes:
Isn't there something in Gnosticism about God abandoning the world?
I hope not! We are doing a pretty bad job of running the place without Him, thats for sure!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by robinrohan, posted 03-24-2006 10:19 AM robinrohan has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024