GFC writes:
How many creationists did you convince of evolution by smashing their scientific sounding arguements? Not many, did you. Creationist arguements are almost like that greek dragon: when you chop of one head, two more grows back. Do you think creationism will ever be falsified once and for all? Do you think these people are any less dogmatic in their thought processes than I am? Religion require you to hold certain ideas as "absolute truth" or "dogma" as you call it. Without it, you have atheism. I can't produce any scientific evidence for God's existance. My believe in him is therefore no less dogmatic than my believe in Genesis 1.
Thats why we have a forum with a site with science forums and also faith/belief forums.
Sir Robin of Rohan writes:
I'm not sure what you mean by "Gnostic."
Mr. World Book1999 CD writes:
Gnosticism, pronounced NAHS tuh sihz uhm, was a religious and philosophical movement in Europe and the Middle East that flourished from about the A.D. 100's to the 700's. There were many Christian and non-Christian Gnostic sects. However, they all believed they had secret knowledge about the nature of the universe and the origin and destiny of humanity.
Gnostics believed that people could attain salvation only by acquiring gnosis, a Greek word meaning knowledge. Most Gnostics believed in an unknown and remote Supreme Being.
Yet I beg to differ that most Christians who are not strict literalists are in fact Gnostic.
Around these parts, we have two basic contrasting views among our Christian group:
1) Not all are "saved". God desires that all be saved, however, and He who began the good work is finishing it.
Or...2) Everyone is already saved (on the planet) God has done the work, and it is now up to us to behave appropriately. Just as the Pagans
got it before the Pharisees and Sadducees, the atheists/agnostics will
get it before the main church folk who are too haughty and exclusivist to see the big picture.
Both sides agree, however, that it is not about a literal Bible in a word for word sense. Some of us disgagree over the origin of the basic thought contained within the Bible and if it can be shown to be cohesive..(Holy Spirit, maybe?) I maintain that it is the character behind the book that is important rather than the book itself.
I disagree that Jesus is not literally necessary to make His philosophy valid. Jesus DOES need to live within us....yet who am I to frame the issue of the characteristics of my Omnipotant God, anyway??
Gradually it was disclosed to me that the line separating good and evil passes not through states, nor between classes, nor between political parties either, but right through every human heart, and through all human hearts. This line shifts. Inside us, it oscillates with the years. Even within hearts overwhelmed by evil, one small bridgehead of good is retained; and even in the best of all hearts, there remains a small corner of evil. --Alexander Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago