Jesus The false prophet

For the Mark 9:1 quote, I think a reasonable interpretation is that Jesus was referring to the Transfiguration described in 9:2-7.In other words, Peter, John, and James got a sneak peek while they were still alive. For more than the sneak peak, including the other predictions, no time frame is given.A similar argument can be made for Matthew 16:28 and possibly even Luke 9:27. I think only those who are spoiling for a fight would have much of a problem with these verses.IMO, Matthew 24:27-34 is a much more problematic scripture.

How can you assess the odds? Does not seem any more cryptic than any other Bible prophecy.

I don't think Harold Camping was lying about the world ending last month. But he was still a false prophet as defined in Deuteronomy, because his prediction was bogus.

I am not the one calling Jesus a false prophet and I don't even think Jesus spoke presumptuously. As I've stated, I believe that the examples Frako gave were actually fulfilled. I do think that Matthew 24:27-34 is a much more problematic scripture.I'm trying to sort through this for myself. But Jesus 'not speaking through God' is not a loophole I can accept.

Since frako has asked about it, I think it can be discussed here. I don't have a well formed opinion on the matter, so I am uncomfortable starting a thread. I think there are existing threads that could be used.

Some of us are interested in the meaning of the verses regardless of whether they support frako's conclusion. Even among the people who insist that Jesus is not a false prophet, there are diverse explanations for that conclusion.Why not just end your own participation without arguing that everyone else should?