The Power of the New Intelligent Design...

Sure we do. But whatever level of evidence we present will never be enough. If we answer at one level you "level leviosa" to something more intricate until you hit the impossible to answer and then declare victory.Creationists. Typical dishonest.

In your impossible ever to achieve perfection of knowledge you can't ever prove anything ... especially your god.But a preponderance of the evidence and the accuracy of our models informs us evolution is the reality. Everything else is stupid religious fantasy.

Really, Phat? Do I have to keep saying this?I suppose if one has the mind of a child then hating the fictional antagonist in their favorite show would be excusable. I may not alway act it but I don't have the mind of a child. You can't hate something that doesn't exist, Phat. You should know that.I can hate the concept, the idea of god, but that is only a side effect.I hate the evil people do in the name of their religion.
I hate the way people are led to that evil by deception of their equally deluded priests.
I hate that religious thought is so violently oppressive to critical thought and the revelation of reality.
I hate religion.Religion is poison to the species, Phat. Your god is kin to the sugar coating on that bitter evil pill you want everyone to swallow.

Fuck You. Do your own research.If you can't find anything then you are not looking hard enough or you are lying.

Not "can't", there bunky (you're lying again), but won't.There are plenty of examples on the net. If you cannot find any then you are lying. Frankly, that is to be expected.Or, better, go to your local university, take a semester of biology, evolution or genetics. When you're done come back here and we'll discuss what you learned.

No. It doesn't.The quote is out of context. Your source lied to you and without checking, you lied to us. Cite the rest of the paragraph, Altar Boy or your jesus-meat crackers will give you heartburn for breaking a commandment.

No, Taq was right. Nested hierarchy proves common ancestry and evolution.You don't like that fact so you try to ignore it.

Science did already. That's where his info came from.Pay attention, Dredge.

Not lacking, but, unknown to you.Have you ever been to a natural history museum? If you go you can actually see some of these lacking transitionals.

No it doesn't. The article is right and so am I. Stumped, aren't you. That dumb cracker munching confused look on your face?The article is right for a very specific usage of the word. I am right for the common parlance use of the word.You have tried to sow confusion between the two for your own nefarious purposes on a number of occasions, as I recall. Paybacks a bitch. I tried to warn you in your test thread.

And, in the tradition of catholicism down through the millennia you would be wrong.Lack of some specific scientific data does not equal god, Dredge, no matter how much you may want it to.

Except the gaps are expected since the physics at the time did not allow for mass fossilization. The gaps represent those missing fossils and not all of them are missing. There are enough to show that patterns of descent can extend into the cambrian. Since all our experience in biology is that all lineages branch and radiate we have no data or reasoning to assume the same does not also apply to the ediacaran to cambrian radiations.You want to put your god in a big bad knowledge hole that we know is explainable, logical and temporary. That's not very convincing.

Areas of ignorance abound. Feel free to hide your god in any of them.

What bad and false assumptions are being made? How do you know they are bad assumptions?

So the nested hierarchy is the only pattern we see in life. So evolution is evidenced once again.You can provide no evidence or acceptable logic to show any alternative.Evolution is the only real game in town.