Hate the sin but love the person...except when voting?

What do you think will happen to people that sees same-sex couples getting married?
What is the harm that will occur? This does not describe what harm would be done.
How would normalisation of homosexuality harm people?You say it is subjective, but can you not at least describe what you consider the harm to be?
Do you think people will see gay couples and think "Hey, I'll give that a go!"?Edited by Panda, : No reason given.Edited by Panda, : typos

None of it makes sense to me.I knew a pub landlord who got very angry when two men in his pub were holding hands.
(Al Murray's phrase "I was never confused!" springs to the fore.)
But he would happily watch lesbian porn movies.I am sure he would have only voted against male same-sex marriage.

I agree, I wouldn't be asking what harm it does to society - but I suspect that was not what you were trying to say. I think that eating shit is perverse - but I don't see what harm it does society.Just to clarify...
(e.g.) Paedophilia is perverse but not harmful to society: it is harmful to individuals.
(I won't describe the actual 'harm' as I hope that is obvious.)
The 'fear of paedophilia' (often spread by newspapers) is harmful to society - but it is not perverse.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

Message 5 does not describe what harm is done to society.You have spent far more time avoiding describing the harm caused by gay marriage than it would have taken to describe it.
I'll let everyone form their own opinion as to why that would be.

Again, you are making this claim.When asked to support this statement, you started shouting "Off topic! Off topic!".Your whole argument is built on this premise, but you cannot back it up with anything.
You cannot even identify the harm it does!
Same-sex marriage is legal is several countries - there must be plenty of evidence of this "negative outcome" - but you have nothing.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

I would be careful of the equivocation.'Normal' is not a correct antonym for 'Perverse' in this discussion.

'Normal' is a useless word to use, IMHO.I completely agree that it could be considered normal to be perverse.
I guess that shows how inappropriate the word 'normal' is as an antonym to 'perverse'. It could be considered normal for humans, but not normal for animals.Edited by Panda, : missed a bitEdited by Panda, : No reason given.Edited by Panda, : No reason given.

Aahh...no children makes you a sinner. Got it.
I'll tell the Pope. Do you?
Or do you claim to know some passage from the bible regarding same-sex marriage? Thank goodness that we can't flood the world everytime we fuck up.
Your omniscient god: what foresight? What control? Yes - far more than mere legaility - but no religion at all.
Love: yes. Commitment: yes. Religion: no.
What was your point? Oh...I see.
God invented marriage therefore any marriage must be to god's rules.
I'll go tell the majority of the world that gets married but doesn't believe in your god. (Maybe some kind of group email?)God didn't invent marriage and he has no impact on it's legal existence. It can't be helped.

Considering the fact that whenever I have tried to get you to address the massive flaws in your arguement you have just cried like a baby - I did not expect very much.Clearly you are homophobic but you have to shoe-horn that hatred into the christian religion.

I was concentrating on your claims.
If your claims are off-topic, then you should not be repeatedly making them in this thread.And why would you falsely claim that I asked for empirically measureable harm?
Ah yes. Because you are still crying about being held to the statements you make.
You think that by adding criteria (that I did not ask for) you can continue to avoid backing up your claims. You seem to have started without the pot.

Which makes me view ICD's comment in a whole different light... I am now unable to think of a 'special bond' that is 'unexplainable' that doesn't include touching.
Seriously - what would be an 'unexplainable special bond'?