Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Evolution is a basic, biological process
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 140 of 306 (174590)
01-07-2005 4:46 AM
Reply to: Message 139 by Tal
01-07-2005 4:37 AM


Re: Die Hard Evolutionists
quote:
A theory becomes law when the theory is proven based on empirical data.
That's dead wrong. A theory is often a whole body of thinking - as evolution is. The theory of thermodynamics includes no less than 4 laws. How, then, would it make sense to change the theroy to thermodynamics to THE law of thermodynamics even if every part of it were "proven".
(Perhaps you would also like to consider the law of faunal succession and how it relates to evolution ?)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 139 by Tal, posted 01-07-2005 4:37 AM Tal has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 141 by Tal, posted 01-07-2005 5:13 AM PaulK has replied

PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 143 of 306 (174595)
01-07-2005 5:22 AM
Reply to: Message 141 by Tal
01-07-2005 5:13 AM


Re: Die Hard Evolutionists
THE law of thermodynamics ? Which is that the first, second, third or zeroth law ? I thought that it is well known enough thatthere is more than one law of thermodynamics that that point would not be questioned.
As I said the theory of thermodynamics incorporates at least four laws. Newtonian mechanics is another theory encompassing more than one law (you HAVE heard of Newton's laws of motion haven't you ?). Like thermodynamics and mechanics evolution is a body of thought that is far greater than could be encompassed in a single "law".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 141 by Tal, posted 01-07-2005 5:13 AM Tal has not replied

PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 145 of 306 (174602)
01-07-2005 5:54 AM
Reply to: Message 144 by Tal
01-07-2005 5:32 AM


Well if none of these officers have heard of the laws (plural) of thermodynamics or Newtons laws (plural) of motion then I can't think that their opinion should carry any weight. If they lack such basic knowledge then it is unlikely that they have seriously studied physics at even a high school level.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 144 by Tal, posted 01-07-2005 5:32 AM Tal has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024