Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Contradictions between Genesis 1-2
EighteenDelta
Inactive Member


Message 16 of 308 (437636)
11-30-2007 8:44 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by Hyroglyphx
11-30-2007 6:09 PM


Re: Contradiction vs omission
So I guess this means you aren't going to address the scriptural inconsistencies provided? It is even acceptable to acknowledge that you don't have an explanation, I can respect that as at least honest, if you don't just ignore it or assert that it's just an issue of brevity.
-x

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by Hyroglyphx, posted 11-30-2007 6:09 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 17 of 308 (437660)
11-30-2007 10:52 PM
Reply to: Message 13 by jar
11-30-2007 4:53 PM


Re: The topic is on the two Genesis stories.
You asked me to outline some of the things that make the two stories mutually exclusive. I did, if you disagree then present your best argument for why there are not two stories.
I did. Unlike most posters who simply copy one tiny blurb that is the least threatening to them, I try to answer all of the questions asked of me.
Well if Moshe actually wrote anything then the evidence is that "Yes, he was that stupid."
Why so sure, based on the rest of his writings? Again, what is more plausible -- that he just bumbled the first two chapters, but wrote with eloquence in the remaining 900 chapters, or that its a synopsis?
But there is no evidence Moshe ever wrote anything or even existed.
Then neither did Plato. Do you want video footage of people writing something in realtime? How exactly, in your estimation, does an historical figure get to become real? What is the measurement?
But the question of why the redactors who were certainly capable of reading not only included two different, mutually exclusive stories, but went a step further and placed the younger story first is a good one. Why did they include two stories of Creation that exclude each other, if one is true the other is false?
An excellent point, though I don't see how that helps your claim. Maybe you should ask yourself that question, since you seem to think the stories are mutually exclusive (even though they clearly are not).
They include both stories because creation is not really what the stories are about. Creation is simply plot devices, tools to use to talk about what was really important to the story tellers.
What then is the really important moral-of-the-story we are supposed to glean from the creation account? Seems like its about the creation of the universe and all material things contained therein.
They put the younger story first because it served as a introduction, a wide angle view from afar, that shows a Transcendent God that oversees everything.
Exactly, which later is brought in to greater detail. You seem to understand, but then take a far departure from where you started.
They then combined several of the older tales from a time when folk saw God as just a super human.
Evidence? If Moses doesn't get to be real, then different tales don't get to be penned by the non-existent Moses.
Again, creation is but a plot device to allow them to present a different view of god, a kindler gentler god, one with many human limitations and weaknesses, one that is somewhat fumbling and unsure, fearful and limited, but also intimate, solid, chatty, companionable.
Where in there did you come up with the notion that God is weak, fearful, or fumbling?
The plot devices in the rest of the story post creation allowed the authors to get to other material that they thought important, why man had to work as a farmer instead of simply foraging like other animals, why we fear snakes, why childbirth seems harder and more painful for humans.
So, there is no way that any of what non-existent Moses said is actually true? You were there when non-existent Moses penned it, crawled in to his non-existent mind, and uncovered his non-existent motives?
What are you basing that off of? Faith?
And that seems to be the point of this thread.
The point of the thread seems to be the blatherings of a kid convinced of his own supposed brilliance. It seems like a slandering ceremony of God rather than an honest inquiry. The OP does not ask any questions, which is the surest sign that he isn't interested in merely having an open-session dialogue. He is making bold accusations about things that Sunday School teachers deal with on a routine basis, and then in self-congratulatory fashion, pats himself on the back for a job well done.
Why did the redactors include two obviously mutually exclusive and contradictory creation myths?
They didn't, whoever the elusive "they" might be. I'm still waiting for you to present your case using the one source that would either corroborate your claim, or bring it in to disrepute -- the book of Genesis.

“This life’s dim windows of the soul, distorts the heavens from pole to pole, and goads you to believe a lie, when you see with and not through the eye.” -William Blake

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by jar, posted 11-30-2007 4:53 PM jar has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 19 by jar, posted 11-30-2007 10:56 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 30 by purpledawn, posted 12-02-2007 7:12 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 18 of 308 (437662)
11-30-2007 10:54 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by Hyroglyphx
11-30-2007 3:04 PM


Off topic BUT ...
Secondly, Moses wrote the rest of the Pentateuch consistently.
This probably is not the place to follow up on this but ...
there is nothing but tradition to even hint that Moshe wrote anything.
the rest of the Pentateuch is NOT consistent.
there are a bunch of stories cobbled together in the flood myths.
the Exodus is a whole bunch of fantasy tales that are totally inconsistent.
One of the more interesting things is that even though the redactors mixed up and merged stories in the Flood myth and in the second older creation myth, why didn't they do the same with the creation tales?
Frankly, other than the points I made above, I can see few reasons. There may have been political or tradition pressures but they are harder to verify.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by Hyroglyphx, posted 11-30-2007 3:04 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 19 of 308 (437664)
11-30-2007 10:56 PM
Reply to: Message 17 by Hyroglyphx
11-30-2007 10:52 PM


Re: The topic is on the two Genesis stories.
Make your case. My points are out there for folk to see.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Hyroglyphx, posted 11-30-2007 10:52 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Force
Inactive Member


Message 20 of 308 (437730)
12-01-2007 5:00 AM
Reply to: Message 6 by Hyroglyphx
11-30-2007 12:37 PM


OFF TOPIC
NJ,
NJ writes:
There is no disparity. These objections are like Sunday school for atheism. And here you are thinking you've really got something of profundity.
So, if I could find a sunday school teacher that supports the contradictions then we could resolve this debate?
NJ writes:
One is a brief synopsis, where the other is going in to more detail. It is in no way two different events.
So you acknowledge two stories?
NJ writes:
"Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them." -Genesis 2:1
This is the continuation from the first chapter, because in the previous chapter, it says:
"And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, it was very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day."
Right there is your indication that it stopped, after the sixth day.
"And on the seventh day God ended his work which he had made; and he rested on the seventh day from all his work which he had made... These [are] the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens"
You could make a better case that Days actually mean long epochs of time, not an actual lunar day.
The point was that there was actual differences in time from one creation story to the other. I could care less how long it actually took according to the stories.
NJ writes:
What are you talking about? Are you joking? Seriously...
"And the LORD God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it. And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat: But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die. And the LORD God said, It is not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him."
It says that God the man (singular), and then, just like in the first chapter, God made him a helper, the female, because it is not good for man to be alone.
Where is the disparity?
Read the entire context of the damned scripture.

Gen 2:4 These [are] the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens,
Gen 2:5 And every plant of the field before it was in the earth, and every herb of the field before it grew: for the LORD God had not caused it to rain upon the earth, and [there was] not a man to till the ground.
Gen 2:6 But there went up a mist from the earth, and watered the whole face of the ground.
Gen 2:7 And the LORD God formed man [of] the dust of the ground, and breathed into his nostrils the breath of life; and man became a living soul.
Gen 2:8 And the LORD God planted a garden eastward in Eden; and there he put the man whom he had formed.
Gen 2:9 And out of the ground made the LORD God to grow every tree that is pleasant to the sight, and good for food; the tree of life also in the midst of the garden, and the tree of knowledge of good and evil.
Gen 2:10 And a river went out of Eden to water the garden; and from thence it was parted, and became into four heads.
Gen 2:11 The name of the first [is] Pison: that [is] it which compasseth the whole land of Havilah, where [there is] gold;
Gen 2:12 And the gold of that land [is] good: there [is] bdellium and the onyx stone.
Gen 2:13 And the name of the second river [is] Gihon: the same [is] it that compasseth the whole land of Ethiopia.
Gen 2:14 And the name of the third river [is] Hiddekel: that [is] it which goeth toward the east of Assyria. And the fourth river [is] Euphrates.
Gen 2:15 And the LORD God took the man, and put him into the garden of Eden to dress it and to keep it.
Gen 2:16 And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:
Gen 2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
Gen 2:18 And the LORD God said, [It is] not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.
Gen 2:19 And out of the ground the LORD God formed every beast of the field, and every fowl of the air; and brought [them] unto Adam to see what he would call them: and whatsoever Adam called every living creature, that [was] the name thereof.
Gen 2:20 And Adam gave names to all cattle, and to the fowl of the air, and to every beast of the field; but for Adam there was not found an help meet for him.
If you read scripture and stop covering your eyes when you read it you may agree with me. You will notice that LORD God created man, then everything else, then realized he forgot something, so then LORD God created female. That is much different than the Genesis 1,2:1-3 story.
NJ writes:
Yes, which most Christians argue is evidence of the Trinity. After all, when God says, "let us make man in our image," who is the "us" and the "our?"
Secondly, Elohim and YHWH is the same thing, just as Adonai, El Shaddai, HaShem are different names for the same Being-- which we refer to in English as, God. That would be like saying Jehova and Yahweh are actually two different Gods, when in reality, they are different names for the same God. Or worse, like saying Yahweh and God are two different Beings rather than two different names for the same entity.
The evidence I have is simple. Elohim means GOD. YHWH ELOHIM means LORD God or if you disrespect the Jews; Jehovah God.
NJ writes:
No, like I said, one is a synopsis and the other is detailed. There are no actual changes to anything. The only thing different is the brevity.
Please stop with the sunday school teachings. You need to bring varifiable information.
NJ writes:
Yeah, which corresponds with what I just said above.
Incorrect. Please stop with the sunday school teachings. You need to bring varifiable information.
NJ writes:
Trial by error? Why do you say that? Where was the error? Where was the trial?
If you read scripture and stop covering your eyes when you read it you may agree with me. You will notice that LORD God created man, then everything else, then realized he forgot something, so then LORD God created female. That is much different than the Genesis 1,2:1-3 story.
NJ writes:
Adonai in Hebrew means Lord. Prefixing LORD next to God does NOT mean that two different gods exist. Ask any scholar, even the most liberal one. Its simply your misunderstanding. I don't even know any fundy atheists who have ever made this objection, which should certainly tell you something.
Here let me post the verse and it may help you.

Gen 1:26 And God said, Let us make man in our image, after our likeness: and let them have dominion over the fish of the sea, and over the fowl of the air, and over the cattle, and over all the earth, and over every creeping thing that creepeth upon the earth.
NJ writes:
Just one! The very one God said NOT to eat from in the first place-- the tree of the knowledge of good and evil.
Gen 1:29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which [is] upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which [is] the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.
Contrast difference below:
Gen 2:16 And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:
Gen 2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
NJ writes:
The earth was given by God for His creation. Mankind is to have dominion over the earth, which does not give man the go ahead to rape the earth.
Please stop with the sunday school teachings. You need to bring varifiable information.
NJ writes:
Again, one is a synopsis, the other slightly more detailed. There is nothing specifically contradictory in any of the alleged contradictions whatsoever. You have endeavored to make a mountain out of a molehill, and not very convincingly at that.
Please stop with the sunday school teachings. You need to bring varifiable information.
Edited by tthzr3, : No reason given.
Edited by tthzr3, : No reason given.
Edited by tthzr3, : clarity
Edited by tthzr3, : removed disrespectful comments
Edited by tthzr3, : No reason given.
Edited by tthzr3, : No reason given.

Thank you

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by Hyroglyphx, posted 11-30-2007 12:37 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 21 by bluescat48, posted 12-01-2007 7:19 AM Force has replied
 Message 22 by jar, posted 12-01-2007 10:57 AM Force has replied
 Message 27 by Hyroglyphx, posted 12-01-2007 8:49 PM Force has replied

bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4220 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 21 of 308 (437747)
12-01-2007 7:19 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by Force
12-01-2007 5:00 AM


Re: Sunday School Teachers
Yes, which most Christians argue is evidence of the Trinity. After all, when God says, "let us make man in our image," who is the "us" and the "our?"
Secondly, Elohim and YHWH is the same thing, just as Adonai, El Shaddai, HaShem are different names for the same Being-- which we refer to in English as, God. That would be like saying Jehova and Yahweh are actually two different Gods, when in reality, they are different names for the same God. Or worse, like saying Yahweh and God are two different Beings rather than two different names for the same entity.
Keep your sunday school shit out of this debate. It offers no evidence. The evidence I have is simple. Elohim means GOD. YHWH ELOHIM means LORD God or if you to disrespect the Jews; Jehovah God.
YHWH (JHVH) & Elohim are the same entity but from different sources, written at different times.
Edited by bluescat48, : No reason given.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Force, posted 12-01-2007 5:00 AM Force has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 23 by Force, posted 12-01-2007 2:50 PM bluescat48 has replied

jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 22 of 308 (437759)
12-01-2007 10:57 AM
Reply to: Message 20 by Force
12-01-2007 5:00 AM


Tone it down.
Stuff like "Keep your sunday school shit out of this debate. " is not really needed nor is it correct. As someone who has taught both adult and children's Sunday School, the actual topic is exactly the type of material I would cover in class.
One of the results of trying to shoehorn the two different stories into one is that when we do so, we loose sight of what the authors and redactors are trying to tell us. This is as true here when talking of creation as it was in the Manna thread and numerous others over the years at EvC.
The important point in these stories is not the details of creation, but rather the very conceptions of the God of creation itself. In both cases it is GOD that creates, yet neither story alone describes GOD, rather each describe a God, a snapshot of how the people of a give era and milieu thought of God. The older tale in Genesis 2 and later pictures a very Anthropomorphic God, one that looks human, walks, talks, makes things by hand, is forgetful and unsure, fearful, makes mistakes, but is also super human, magical, and that lives forever. The biggest differences between this God and man is that this God preceded man, has command of powerful beings and forces and lives forever.
It is a very human God.
The God of the tradition found in the younger tale found in Genesis 1 through the first half of Genesis 2:4 is quite different.
It is not given any clear form. The closest we come to any physical description is the passage were this God creates man. But the differences continue, the younger God is apart from creation yet overseeing it, creates not by hand but by will, has no direct contact with what is created but looks on approvingly, satisfied.
When we consider that they included both descriptions, we see a composite picture (even later than either tale itself) of a God that is both, transcendent yet intimate, apart yet inclusive, beyond comprehension yet companionable.
The redactors, by including both stories, are saying that GOD is far more than just the Gods we imagine.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Force, posted 12-01-2007 5:00 AM Force has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 24 by Force, posted 12-01-2007 3:06 PM jar has not replied

Force
Inactive Member


Message 23 of 308 (437806)
12-01-2007 2:50 PM
Reply to: Message 21 by bluescat48
12-01-2007 7:19 AM


Re: Sunday School Teachers
bluecat48,
YHWH (JHVH) & Elohim are the same entity but from different sources, written at different times.
The issue is you have not a shred of evidence for that. What evidence we do have though is that redaction is plausible.
I hope you realized the quotes in my post were quotes that NJ posted in his original post.

Thank you

This message is a reply to:
 Message 21 by bluescat48, posted 12-01-2007 7:19 AM bluescat48 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by bluescat48, posted 12-01-2007 5:30 PM Force has replied

Force
Inactive Member


Message 24 of 308 (437815)
12-01-2007 3:06 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by jar
12-01-2007 10:57 AM


off topic
Jar,
jar writes:
Stuff like "Keep your sunday school shit out of this debate. " is not really needed nor is it correct. As someone who has taught both adult and children's Sunday School, the actual topic is exactly the type of material I would cover in class.
and?
jar writes:
One of the results of trying to shoehorn the two different stories into one is that when we do so, we loose sight of what the authors and redactors are trying to tell us. This is as true here when talking of creation as it was in the Manna thread and numerous others over the years at EvC.
It is true that we accept the two stories as a product of redaction. However, not everyone does or will.
jar writes:
The important point in these stories is not the details of creation, but rather the very conceptions of the God of creation itself. In both cases it is GOD that creates, yet neither story alone describes GOD, rather each describe a God, a snapshot of how the people of a give era and milieu thought of God. The older tale in Genesis 2 and later pictures a very Anthropomorphic God, one that looks human, walks, talks, makes things by hand, is forgetful and unsure, fearful, makes mistakes, but is also super human, magical, and that lives forever. The biggest differences between this God and man is that this God preceded man, has command of powerful beings and forces and lives forever.
It is a very human God.
The God of the tradition found in the younger tale found in Genesis 1 through the first half of Genesis 2:4 is quite different.
It is not given any clear form. The closest we come to any physical description is the passage were this God creates man. But the differences continue, the younger God is apart from creation yet overseeing it, creates not by hand but by will, has no direct contact with what is created but looks on approvingly, satisfied.
When we consider that they included both descriptions, we see a composite picture (even later than either tale itself) of a God that is both, transcendent yet intimate, apart yet inclusive, beyond comprehension yet companionable.
The redactors, by including both stories, are saying that GOD is far more than just the Gods we imagine.
I can agree with this information and we have discussed it previously in the chat room.
Edited by tthzr3, : clarity
Edited by tthzr3, : No reason given.
Edited by tthzr3, : No reason given.

Thank you

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by jar, posted 12-01-2007 10:57 AM jar has not replied

bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4220 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 25 of 308 (437878)
12-01-2007 5:30 PM
Reply to: Message 23 by Force
12-01-2007 2:50 PM


Re: Sunday School Teachers
Yah·wist (ywst) also Yah·vist (-vst)
n.
The putative author of the earliest sources of the Hexateuch in which God is consistently referred to by the Tetragrammaton.The American Heritage® Dictionary of the English Language, Fourth Edition copyright ©2000
E*lo"hist (?), n. The writer, or one of the writers, of the passages of the Old Testament, notably those of the Pentateuch, which are characterized by the use of Elohim instead of Jehovah, as the name of the Supreme Being; -- distinguished from Jehovist. S. Davidson.
- Webster's Unabridged Dictionary (1913

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by Force, posted 12-01-2007 2:50 PM Force has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 26 by Force, posted 12-01-2007 6:07 PM bluescat48 has not replied

Force
Inactive Member


Message 26 of 308 (437892)
12-01-2007 6:07 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by bluescat48
12-01-2007 5:30 PM


Re: Sunday School Teachers
bluecat48,
Those are definitions but they are not actual pieces of evidence. I am sure those pieces of information do reference some evidence but what evidence?
Edited by tthzr3, : clarity
Edited by tthzr3, : edited meaning

Thank you

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by bluescat48, posted 12-01-2007 5:30 PM bluescat48 has not replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 27 of 308 (437908)
12-01-2007 8:49 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by Force
12-01-2007 5:00 AM


Re: Sunday School Teachers
So, if I could find a sunday school teacher that supports the contradictions then we could resolve this debate?
I think you are misunderstanding me. My comment about "Sunday School" was referring to your alleged contradiction. The "Two Creation Account" theory is like a question a little kid asks his Sunday School teacher. In other words, I think your post is kind of asinine.
So you acknowledge two stories?
No. I acknowledge one story with varying descriptions -- one more descriptive, one less descriptive.
The point was that there was actual differences in time from one creation story to the other. I could care less how long it actually took according to the stories.
Really? And how exactly have you deduced that? I'm sure biblical scholars the world over would very much like to hear how this esoteric knowledge has come to you.
Read the entire context of the damned scripture.
I have... You should follow your own advice because its evident that you either only see what you want to see or your intellect is suspect.
If you read scripture and stop covering your eyes when you read it you may agree with me. You will notice that LORD God created man, then everything else, then realized he forgot something, so then LORD God created female. That is much different than the Genesis 1,2:1-3 story.
Oh for heavens sake... Again, are you kidding me with this Mickey Mouse stuff?!?! God didn't forget to make a female, especially when right before He made male and female for every other creature on the planet. its Jewish poetry. The blindingly obvious illustration is that it is good for a man to be with a woman -- that God designed it as such that a man and a woman would desire each other's company.
It looks like you are a biblical literalist... Literally! I, on the other hand, look for genre and figures of speech to illustrate a greater, overall point like most people do.
The evidence I have is simple. Elohim means GOD. YHWH ELOHIM means LORD God
Elohim is the plurality of God, since "EL" means God. Its similar in Arabic. Ever hear the insurgents screaming Allahu Ahkbar? Allahu is the plurality of Allah -- Allah being the singular. YHWH is the highest emanation of God, which is supposed to be ineffable.
Regardless, they are one in the same. Your objection is like if your name was Daniel. You have a few derivatives. You have Daniel, Danny, and Dan. But in your world, there are actually three different people rather than one person with variations of his name.
or if you disrespect the Jews; Jehovah God.
Speaking of disrespecting Jews, and God for that matter, your trite argument is tantamount to calling Jews idiots -- as if they don't understand their own language. I doubt that no one else on earth has come to the wild assumption you've come up with based on a cursory glance.
Please stop with the sunday school teachings. You need to bring varifiable information.
I have brought to bear verifiable information. I'm waiting for you to present an argument worth defending.
quote:
Gen 1:29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which [is] upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which [is] the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat.
Contrast difference below:
quote:
Gen 2:16 And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:
Gen 2:17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
Okay...? What am I supposed to be seeing? God says, eat from the vegetation I provide for you, just don't eat fruit from this one.
Please stop with the sunday school teachings. You need to bring varifiable information.
How many times are you going to say that? Why not answer my questions. Why not debate the information I provided? Your entire reply consisted of you re-posting Genesis, as if I don't have access to a Bible, and then repetitiously saying the same things over and over again.
Try debating the issues. Its what we're all here to do.

“This life’s dim windows of the soul, distorts the heavens from pole to pole, and goads you to believe a lie, when you see with and not through the eye.” -William Blake

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by Force, posted 12-01-2007 5:00 AM Force has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by Force, posted 12-01-2007 9:57 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

jar
Member (Idle past 424 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 28 of 308 (437912)
12-01-2007 9:52 PM


The Flood myth is an example of two or more stories.
As pointed out above, the redactors of the Bible kept the two creation traditions separate and distinct. They treated the various flood myths quite differently, often putting some part of the story from one tradition immediately adjacent to that of another.
A few examples can be seen in the following sections.
In Genesis 6 we can see the two traditions in the descriptions of God planning the flood. In Genesis 6:5-8 that is likely from a J source we see God talking to himself, then going to Noah. Only a few verses later we see the P source version of the story at Genesis 6:11-16 where God plans the whole thing during a discussion with Noah.
Immediately after that we see the P source discussion of Noah's special favor, while it is found repeated for the J source in Genesis 7:1.
Still in Genesis 6:19-22 we find the P source description of what critters should be taken, while the J source description is found in Genesis 7:2-5.
The two stories continue with different descriptions of the start and duration of the flood as well as different versions of how Noah discovers the flood has ended and of the promises afterwards.
However it is pretty clear that the flood story is a hodgepodge mixture of at least two different fables and traditions.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

Force
Inactive Member


Message 29 of 308 (437914)
12-01-2007 9:57 PM
Reply to: Message 27 by Hyroglyphx
12-01-2007 8:49 PM


Re: Sunday School Teachers
NJ,
NJ writes:
I think you are misunderstanding me. My comment about "Sunday School" was referring to your alleged contradiction. The "Two Creation Account" theory is like a question a little kid asks his Sunday School teacher. In other words, I think your post is kind of asinine.
The problem here is that you don't follow evidence. Instead you follow what a sunday school teacher teaches. The issues discussed in message 1 are still issues regardless of what excuse you come up with. The information in Genesis 1,2:1-3 contradicts the information in Genesis 2:4-25.
NJ writes:
No. I acknowledge one story with varying descriptions -- one more descriptive, one less descriptive.
Really? And how exactly have you deduced that? I'm sure biblical scholars the world over would very much like to hear how this esoteric knowledge has come to you.
Gen 1:31 And God saw every thing that he had made, and, behold, [it was] very good. And the evening and the morning were the sixth day.
Contrast difference to:
Gen 2:4 These [are] the generations of the heavens and of the earth when they were created, in the day that the LORD God made the earth and the heavens
The entirety of the story in Genesis 2:4-25 is in reference to this starting verse which indicates the day creation occured. The information in Genesis 1:31 contradicts the information in 2:4.
NJ writes:
I have... You should follow your own advice because its evident that you either only see what you want to see or your intellect is suspect.
The first time I read Genesis 1 and 2 my understanding was the same as the one you accept. However, I started to analyze the information in Genesis and realized that there were actually two different creation stories there. The first indication was that in Genesis 2:4 the words "LORD God" started to be used. The other indications I mentioned in post 1 were realized with a contrast comparison overview. When I hear you trying to substantiate your perception of those two chapters, all I hear out of you is one excuse after another, and not a single one of them has verifiable evidence. To be honest with you I really do want to trust the information in the Bible as divine but however the case proclaims no divinity.
NJ writes:
Oh for heavens sake... Again, are you kidding me with this Mickey Mouse stuff?!?! God didn't forget to make a female, especially when right before He made male and female for every other creature on the planet. its Jewish poetry. The blindingly obvious illustration is that it is good for a man to be with a woman -- that God designed it as such that a man and a woman would desire each other's company.
It looks like you are a biblical literalist... Literally! I, on the other hand, look for genre and figures of speech to illustrate a greater, overall point like most people do.
The issue here is not that I am being a kidder. The issue here is that you're accepting the content of the Bible before you accept the evidence that it is stories with some verifiable historical content.
As for your comment about me being a literalist; it indicates that you're aware of the contradictions in the Bible.
NJ writes:
Elohim is the plurality of God, since "EL" means God. Its similar in Arabic. Ever hear the insurgents screaming Allahu Ahkbar? Allahu is the plurality of Allah -- Allah being the singular. YHWH is the highest emanation of God, which is supposed to be ineffable.
It depends on the context and in the context of Genesis 2 Elohim is being used as a singular noun.
Elohim - Wikipedia
NJ writes:
Speaking of disrespecting Jews, and God for that matter, your trite argument is tantamount to calling Jews idiots -- as if they don't understand their own language. I doubt that no one else on earth has come to the wild assumption you've come up with based on a cursory glance.
I have read Genesis 1 and 2 many times.
NJ writes:
I have brought to bear verifiable information. I'm waiting for you to present an argument worth defending.
What? Everything you have posted is an excuse as to why the two stories in Genesis 1 and 2 contradict each other. If you could provide some information that substantiated your claims that would be nice.
NJ writes:
Okay...? What am I supposed to be seeing? God says, eat from the vegetation I provide for you, just don't eat fruit from this one.
That is what 2:16-17 says now try to read 1:29.
NJ writes:
How many times are you going to say that? Why not answer my questions. Why not debate the information I provided? Your entire reply consisted of you re-posting Genesis, as if I don't have access to a Bible, and then repetitiously saying the same things over and over again.
Try debating the issues. Its what we're all here to do.
I have refuted you time and time again.
Edited by tthzr3, : clarity

Thank you

This message is a reply to:
 Message 27 by Hyroglyphx, posted 12-01-2007 8:49 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

purpledawn
Member (Idle past 3488 days)
Posts: 4453
From: Indiana
Joined: 04-25-2004


Message 30 of 308 (437963)
12-02-2007 7:12 AM
Reply to: Message 17 by Hyroglyphx
11-30-2007 10:52 PM


Re: The topic is on the two Genesis stories.
quote:
The point of the thread seems to be the blatherings of a kid convinced of his own supposed brilliance. It seems like a slandering ceremony of God rather than an honest inquiry. The OP does not ask any questions, which is the surest sign that he isn't interested in merely having an open-session dialogue. He is making bold accusations about things that Sunday School teachers deal with on a routine basis, and then in self-congratulatory fashion, pats himself on the back for a job well done.
Actually various Bible scholars have been working on these issues for centuries. My information is based on the book by Biblical scholar, Richard Elliott Friedman, called "Who Wrote the Bible?"
A writer's style of writing is usually consistent within a written work. The creation stories are not consistent for one writer and when separated each story can stand alone.
The difference in the way the authors refer to God is very distinctive and sparked further investigation. Scholars have been able to extract the various styles within Genesis and still have stories that can stand on their own.
The Flood story is a good example. This is from the Complete Jewish Bible
Adonai=YHWH - J Writer
Genesis 6
5 ADONAI saw that the people on earth were very wicked, that all the imaginings of their hearts were always of evil only.
6 ADONAI regretted that he had made humankind on the earth; it grieved his heart. 7 ADONAI said, "I will wipe out humankind, whom I have created, from the whole earth; and not only human beings, but animals, creeping things and birds in the air; for I regret that I ever made them."
8 But Noach found grace in the sight of ADONAI.
Genesis 7
1 ADONAI said to Noach, "Come into the ark, you and all your household; for I have seen that you alone in this generation are righteous before me. 2 Of every clean animal you are to take seven couples, and of the animals that are not clean, one couple; 3 also of the birds in the air take seven couples - in order to preserve their species throughout the earth. 4 For in seven more days I will cause it to rain on the earth forty days and forty nights; I will wipe out every living thing that I have made from the face of the earth."
5 Noach did all that ADONAI ordered him to do.
7 Noach went into the ark with his sons, his wife and his sons' wives, because of the floodwaters.
10 After seven days the water flooded the earth.
12 It rained on the earth forty days and forty nights.
and ADONAI shut him inside.
17 The flood was forty days on the earth; the water grew higher and floated the ark, so that it was lifted up off the earth. 18 The water overflowed the earth and grew deeper, until the ark floated on the surface of the water. 19 The water overpowered the earth mightily; all the high mountains under the entire sky were covered; 20 the water covered the mountains by more than twenty-two-and-a-half feet.
22 everything in whose nostrils was the breath of the spirit of life; whatever was on dry land died. 23 He wiped out every living thing on the surface of the ground - not only human beings, but livestock, creeping animals and birds in the air. They were wiped out from the earth; only Noach was left, along with those who were with him in the ark.
Genesis 8
6 After forty days Noach opened the window of the ark which he had built;
8 Then he sent out a dove, to see if the water had gone from the surface of the ground. 9 But the dove found no place for her feet to rest, so she returned to him in the ark, because the water still covered the whole earth. He put out his hand, took her and brought her in to him in the ark. 10 He waited another seven days and again sent the dove out from the ark. 11 The dove came in to him in the evening, and there in her mouth was a freshly plucked olive leaf, so Noach knew that the water had cleared from the earth. 12 He waited yet another seven days and sent out the dove, and she didn't return to him any more.
20 Noach built an altar to ADONAI. Then he took from every clean animal and every clean bird, and he offered burnt offerings on the altar. 21 ADONAI smelled the sweet aroma, and ADONAI said in his heart, "I will never again curse the ground because of humankind, since the imaginings of a person's heart are evil from his youth; nor will I ever again destroy all living things, as I have done. 22 So long as the earth exists, sowing time and harvest, cold and heat, summer and winter, and day and night will not cease."
God- Priestly Writer
Genesis 6
9 Here is the history of Noach. In his generation, Noach was a man righteous and wholehearted; Noach walked with God. 10 Noach fathered three sons, Shem, Ham and Yefet.
11 The earth was corrupt before God, the earth was filled with violence. 12 God saw the earth, and, yes, it was corrupt; for all living beings had corrupted their ways on the earth.
13 God said to Noach, "The end of all living beings has come before me, for because of them the earth is filled with violence. I will destroy them along with the earth. 14 Make yourself an ark of gofer-wood; you are to make the ark with rooms and cover it with pitch both outside and inside. 15 Here is how you are to build it: the length of the ark is to be 450 feet, its width seventy-five feet and its height forty-five feet. 16 You are to make an opening for daylight in the ark eighteen inches below its roof. Put a door in its side; and build it with lower, second and third decks. 17 "Then I myself will bring the flood of water over the earth to destroy from under heaven every living thing that breathes; everything on earth will be destroyed. 18 But I will establish my covenant with you; you will come into the ark, you, your sons, your wife and your sons' wives with you. 19 "From everything living, from each kind of living being, you are to bring two into the ark, to keep them alive with you; they are to be male and female. 20 Of each kind of bird, each kind of livestock, and each kind of animal creeping on the ground, two are to come to you, so that they can be kept alive. 21 Also take from all the kinds of food that are eaten, and collect it for yourself; it is to be food for you and for them."
22 This is what Noach did; he did all that God ordered him to do.
Genesis 7
6 Noach was 600 years old when the water flooded the earth.
8 Of clean animals, of animals that are not clean, of birds, and of everything that creeps on the ground, 9 couples, male and female, went in to Noach in the ark, as God had ordered Noach.
11 On the seventeenth day of the second month of the 600th year of Noach's life all the fountains of the great deep were broken up, and the windows of the sky were opened.
13 On that same day Noach entered the ark with Shem, Ham and Yefet the sons of Noach, Noach's wife and the three wives of his sons accompanying them; 14 they, and every animal of every species, all the livestock of every species, every animal that creeps on the ground of every species, and every bird of every species - all sorts of winged creatures. 15 They went in to Noach in the ark, couples from every kind of living thing that breathes. 16 Those that entered went in, male and female, from every kind of living being, as God had ordered him;
21 All living beings that moved on the earth perished - birds, livestock, other animals, insects, and every human being,
24 The water held power over the earth for 150 days.
Genesis 8
1 God remembered Noach, every living thing and all the livestock with him in the ark; so God caused a wind to pass over the earth, and the water began to go down. 2 Also the fountains of the deep and the windows of the sky were stopped, the rain from the sky was restrained, 3 and the water came back from completely covering the earth. It was after 150 days that the water went down.
4 On the seventeenth day of the seventh month the ark came to rest on the mountains of Ararat. 5 The water kept going down until the tenth month; on the first day of the tenth month the tops of the mountains were seen.
7 and he sent out a raven, which flew back and forth until the water had dried up from the earth.
13 By the first day of the first month of the 601st year the water had dried up from off the earth; so Noach removed the covering of the ark and looked; and, yes, the surface of the ground was dry. 14 It was on the twenty-seventh day of the second month that the earth was dry.
15 God said to Noach, 16 "Go out from the ark, you, your wife, your sons and your son's wives with you. 17 Bring out with you every living thing you have with you - birds, livestock and every animal that creeps on the earth - so that they can swarm on the earth, be fruitful and multiply on the earth." 18 So Noach went out with his sons, his wife and his sons' wives; 19 every animal, every creeping thing and every bird, whatever moves on the earth, according to their families, went out of the ark.
This is something that would be difficult to do within a one author writing. I don't feel that either creation story could be split into two complete stories as the flood story was done.
This is some of what leads the scholars researching with the Documentary Hypothesis to conclude that the creation stories are separate and by two different authors.

"Peshat is what I say and derash is what you say." --Nehama Leibowitz

This message is a reply to:
 Message 17 by Hyroglyphx, posted 11-30-2007 10:52 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 31 by jar, posted 12-02-2007 10:29 AM purpledawn has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024