I have already done what you requested in my "Thread", 'Is logic science?' about a year ago, where I demolished my apponents arguments with the principle of an axiom and other fine arguments. We spent over 300 something posts and I am sure there are hundreds you could pull up on this website alone forthe arguments you request.
Well, I read every one of the 312 posts in the tread suggested, and I can certainly agree with your assessment of the outcome. You really blew them all out of the water with your argument:
Bertot in message #160 writes:
Its an Axiom, you cant refute it.
Why did no one think of that from the start?
Actually, I was being a bit sarcastic there. my assessment of the thread was you badly stating your position; Admin forwarding it; crashfrog, RAZD, PaulK, Dr Adequate, Chiroptera, Subbie, modulous, molbiogirl, and anyone else who made a peep on the thread ripping you a new a-hole.
Now, your apparent inability to ascertain that more then one a-hole is non-standard seems to have persisted, and informs my comprehension as to how any argument will find you in the future.
I cannot, therefore, accept that you do, indeed, have a demonstration of God's existance, and am unable to apply such as evidence toward the historical veracity of seemingly miraculous, Biblical claims.
And please do not open another tread. That was my bad.
Edited by lyx2no, : To replace colon after a-hole with a period. (At the very least, the colon should have preceded the a-hole.)
Kindly
When I was young I loved everything about cigarettes: the smell, the taste, the feel . everything. Now that I’m older I’ve had a change of heart. Want to see the scar?
™ Version 4.2
