I just want to add that the evidence against any global flood since the Precambrian cuts across not just many subdisciplines in geology besides sedimentology but also across all disciplines of natural science and beyond into even history and linguistics.
And of course it violates virtually everything consituting evidence in prehistoric archeology.
I would argue that nearly all of science either is, or is dependent upon a framework or understanding, that directly contradicts the concept of such a global flood.
The overwhelming amount of evidence from so many different disciplines and subdisciplines within and even outside of science clearly show there was no global flood, not 4,350 years ago, not 8,000 years ago, not even 600,000,000 years ago nor anytime since.
See
Message 7 as to the reasoning behind these statements.
Read not to contradict and confute, not to believe and take for granted, not to find talk and discourse, but to weigh and consider - Francis Bacon
The more we understand particular things, the more we understand God - Spinoza
™ Version 4.2
