There is an appalling lack of historical evidence backing the Bible's veracity

Which , of course is a contradiction to the claim that Jesus is 'of the seed of David', which means that he is a direct decedent of David through an unbroken male line, and through Solomon.This means, of course, that since there is a contradiction between the claims about Jesus, and certain definitions, the genealogy of Jesus is
incorrect about him being the seed of David, if it isn't totally manufactured to begin with.Of course, there is no evidence that was his bloodline, or that he even existed from any kind of contemporary secular works.Edited by ramoss, : No reason given.

Is it the same one as the one in the scriptures? Sure, the name existed. That is true. But, is it the extensive Kingdom that is described in the Jewish scriptures? If so, where is the convergence of evidence?