Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Internet Porn
Cold Foreign Object 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3077 days)
Posts: 3417
Joined: 11-21-2003


Message 249 of 295 (121282)
07-02-2004 6:04 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by Silent H
02-24-2004 11:31 AM


"Deep" Arguments by Holmes: Deep as a Toilet bowl
1. Can kids be adversely affected by internet porn? I think the answer is yes.
The answer is resoundingly, if not 100% definitively NO!
You want a study? Go out there and look for them. There have been many studies done and the effect seen in every single one is zero, zilch, nada.
It doesn't matter what you say or claim OR if ten thousand studies assert that porn does not adversely affect kids. It is not a matter of a opinion - all intelligent and honest people know it does - this is a brute fact.
Kids are impressionable - they are walking sponges.
Holmes has no argument or case, whatever he or she is - they are whitewashing black to be something other. Holmes is probably a pedophile but he or she probably would never admit it.
This entire question answers itself IF honesty and integrity exist.
Does porn adversely affect kids ?
Merely asking the question reveals an answer of nonsense to follow.
It is not a matter of opinion - porn is evil to kids. Only completely amoral perverts without any character argue these things, while hiding behind First Amendment rights which is not the issue.
If ten thousand persons with Ph.D.'s say porn does not harm kids this means they are secret pedophiles and brazen liars. I wish I knew what this Holmes creep looked like - I bet he is a life long customer of prostitutes.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Silent H, posted 02-24-2004 11:31 AM Silent H has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 250 by Silent H, posted 07-02-2004 8:40 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied
 Message 251 by crashfrog, posted 07-03-2004 12:54 AM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

  
Cold Foreign Object 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3077 days)
Posts: 3417
Joined: 11-21-2003


Message 267 of 295 (122426)
07-06-2004 4:07 PM
Reply to: Message 265 by Silent H
07-05-2004 7:25 AM


Within the last month Australia called upon people to start having more babies. Israelis have for the last decade called upon their citizens to have more babies. And many within the Northern European elements of the Western world have been upset by falling birthrates of Northern Europeans.
You left out Japan.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 265 by Silent H, posted 07-05-2004 7:25 AM Silent H has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024