Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,916 Year: 4,173/9,624 Month: 1,044/974 Week: 3/368 Day: 3/11 Hour: 0/0


EvC Forum ⇒ Science Forums ⇒ Creation/Evolution Miscellany ⇒

Does Darwinism Equal "No God"?

Thread ▼ Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Does Darwinism Equal "No God"?
Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.7

Normal Thread Display
Message 161 of 298 (270873)
12-19-2005 5:17 PM 		Reply to: Message 119 by randman
12-19-2005 1:34 PM

Forum Guidelines Warning
randman writes:
​
Frankly, people like you that are not interested in truth are not worth wasting a lot of time with.
​
Please focus your attention on the topic and not on what you perceive as the shortcomings of those you're debating with.
​
--Percy
EvC Forum Director
This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by randman, posted 12-19-2005 1:34 PM randman has not replied
Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.7

Normal Thread Display
Message 162 of 298 (270875)
12-19-2005 5:19 PM 		Reply to: Message 121 by randman
12-19-2005 1:56 PM

Forum Guidelines Warning II
randman writes:
​
You were answered, and now you are lying, as I think is usual for you.
​
...
​
Btw, I don't expect an apology because I don't think you are an honest person.
​
Please do not allow yourself to become personal in the discussion. Keep your attention focused on the topic.
​
This message has been edited by Admin, 12-19-2005 05:20 PM
​
--Percy
EvC Forum Director
This message is a reply to:
 Message 121 by randman, posted 12-19-2005 1:56 PM randman has not replied
Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.7

Normal Thread Display
Message 174 of 298 (270906)
12-19-2005 6:32 PM 		Reply to: Message 141 by randman
12-19-2005 3:25 PM

Forum Guidelines Warning III
randman writes:
​
My experience has been evo factual claims have often been wrong, and so as far as the science side goes, I think objectively one should doubt the veracity of ToE.
​
A better effort at staying on-topic would be appreciated.
​
This message has been edited by Admin, 12-19-2005 06:32 PM
​
--Percy
EvC Forum Director
This message is a reply to:
 Message 141 by randman, posted 12-19-2005 3:25 PM randman has not replied
Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.7

Normal Thread Display
Message 215 of 298 (271183)
12-20-2005 6:40 PM 		Reply to: Message 213 by jar
12-20-2005 6:22 PM

Re: Stopping the sun
jar writes:
​
Good. We're in a science thread. Please provide the scientific evidence that supports the flood myth.
​
But it would be off-topic.
​
--Percy
EvC Forum Director
This message is a reply to:
 Message 213 by jar, posted 12-20-2005 6:22 PM jar has not replied
Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.7

Normal Thread Display
Message 216 of 298 (271184)
12-20-2005 6:41 PM 		Reply to: Message 214 by pink sasquatch
12-20-2005 6:37 PM

Re: Stopping the sun
pink sasquatch writes:
​
Uh huh, sorry, the sun's standing still left no evidence but the flood did. Too bad for your smugly stupid little comment.
​
It obviously wasn't a stupid comment, since it proved my point.
​
This is off topic. Please start a new thread.
​
--Percy
EvC Forum Director
This message is a reply to:
 Message 214 by pink sasquatch, posted 12-20-2005 6:37 PM pink sasquatch has replied
Replies to this message:
 Message 217 by pink sasquatch, posted 12-20-2005 6:57 PM Admin has replied
Admin
Director
Posts: 13046
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.7

Normal Thread Display
Message 218 of 298 (271200)
12-20-2005 7:58 PM 		Reply to: Message 217 by pink sasquatch
12-20-2005 6:57 PM

Re: on being off-topic, or not.
I guess there could be different opinions on this, but I see this thread as coming at the "Darwinism => atheism" from the science side. You can come at the same issue from the Biblical side, but it seems out of place given the way this thread started with Charlie Rose's interview of Watson and Wilson as a point of departure.
​
Let me make a few suggestions. You could find an existing thread in which to pick up that angle on the topic, or you could begin a new thread, or if you're willing to wait 24 hours to see if discussion on the original topic resumes, I guess it would be fine to discuss it here if this topic remains dormant. It does seem to possibly be winding down.
​
--Percy
EvC Forum Director
This message is a reply to:
 Message 217 by pink sasquatch, posted 12-20-2005 6:57 PM pink sasquatch has not replied
Date format: mm-dd-yyyy
Timezone: ET (US)
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024