using the Bible as an example just make syou obstinate and looking to cause trouble.
If you're going to talk to me I'd appreciate it if you could write like an educated person instead of like a grade-school child. Capitalize your sentences. Use appropriate, correct spelling and punctuation.
You're not talking with people on Twitter, you're talking to educated scientists. It's time for you to act like it. Your frequent mistakes make it all but impossible to understand what you're trying to say.
the Bible is 100% true and there has been no scientific or archaeological discovery thathas provenone part of it false.
The Bible has been disproven by an ample number of archeological and scientific discoveries which you have simply dismissed as a conspiracy by "secularists" to attack Christianity. That's not to mention all the archeological discoveries that are completely missing, if the accounts of the Bible are to be believed.
what was true 5,000, 2,000 years ago is still true today and that is the Bible not secular science and its evolutionary alternatives.
...and from what evidence do you conclude this? Do you see, yet, the circular reasoning you're engaged in? You believe the Bible is authoritative because that's supported by the evidence; evidence that contradicts that notion can be disregarded because the Bible is authoritative.
Perfectly circular. Your entire position is a fallacy.
™ Version 4.2
