9-11 Conspiracy

The answer is that that question is irrelevant. In mainstream american media, it gets absolutely no headlines, however if you broaden your media intake you would know that other countries in different languages and cultures have been giving this story quite a bit of attention. Just recently Japan has been bringing up specific questions in their government. Canada has done documentaries. And so has sweden. There are countless examples, it just comes down to broadening your media intake to other sources besides fox, cnn, and nbc. Not only that but our own government has called for a reinvestigation of 911, ironically right after bush went out of office.The main questionable thing about 911 is the way the building fell. Physics says they fell at nearly freefall speed, even common logic can figure that a pancake theory is irrelevant. The evidence that points to a controlled demolition is staggering.
-explosives were heard in buildings even before the plane crashed.
-molten steel at bottom of the buildings
-rate at which they fell, seriously building 7 wasnt hit, and it fell in exactly the same way. buildings are made to be able to take a lot of resistance.
-employees having lots of evacuation practice procedures, and even interviews of survivors saying they heard lots of weird noises the weeks before it occurred
-a huge terrorist insurance taken out just 2 months before 911
-stock market predictions, where people put money on airlines failing at a much higher rate than usual. It shows someone knew prior to 911.
-the list goes onNow please explain to me scientifically, how it is possible for a 100 story building to fall that fast without using explosives to get rid of the resistance at the bottom and middle of the building.Also please tell me the evidence we have that linked Osama Bin Laden to 911.I've read the 911 commission report and its overall scientific bullshit. Anyone who has even taken a basic college physics class can figure this out. They didn't even mention building 7 until recently.

Ok it's good that you're being open minded about this because science promotes and thrives on open mindedness because the advancement of our understanding about the reality in which we exist depends upon our willingness to consider new ideas. Scientific discovery often depends on new ways of thinking. Lets start with the basics.In physics the acceleration of a falling object is 9.8 m/s^2. We will use WTC 7 as a example. Wtc 7 is 226 meters high and fell to the ground in about around 7 seconds. Now the calculation if we were to drop a large rock from 226 meters is.d=vt+gt^2/2
d=distance
v=initial velocity
g=gravity
t=time226 meters = (0)(t) + ( (9.8)(T^2) ) / (2)So do this and solve for T, and you get about 6.8 seconds.So basically the building fell at about the same rate as if someone were to drop a rock from the top of the building.Now in order for this to happen there cannot be any resistance within the building at all. If the pancake theory is true, which is the official story, it would have taken much longer for the building to collapse providing that each floor would provide a little resistance to gravity slowing the acceleration.My answer to this and only somewhat reasonable explanation for this is that there had to be explosives, which removed all resistance in the buildings core to enable it to fall at the rate it did.Now my question to you is how can you explain this phenomena.

Your argument does not make any sense.
1. I'm talking about the rate at which the building fell. It doesn't matter what the end distance is. We just replace 158 meters with 226 meters for both the examples of the building falling and the object falling. It is still the same rate at which it is falling. And if so it's still only about a 1 second difference from freefall speed even if we do include your obviously irrelevant argument. Seriously 52 floors in 7 seconds? that means that every second there were 7.4 floors taken out through a domino effect. The pancake theory is just utter hogwash, which is the official story. If you watch a video of it it is obvious that the resistance for all 54 floors was taken out at the same time, just like when they do a demolition.I find it funny that you seriously think that by giving me some useless information, it instantly debunks everything I said. You need to present to me scientific explanations of why this happened and back it up with logic and science. But of course the people who respond on this thread probably have no degree in anything, and havnt even taken classes in physics.