|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: Religion is Evil! | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18353 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
DC85 writes: I believe that most, if not all conflict in History can be traced to a spiritual conflict. The Holy Spirit in this corner. And over there, _____________. God is not always on the side of America, either!Of course, I believe in One way to God, so it follows that I define the conflict thusly.
Religion has Brought on most of the Wars in this world and still leads people to hate others outside there own faith.Dan Carroll writes: Kinda like money, eh Dan? Money is not the root of all evil. The Love of Money is the root of all evil. Right?
How someone uses an idea doesn't mean the idea itself is evil.DC85 writes: I agree. Jesus hung out with partiers and not Pharisees.
Being away from religion keeps me more open minded to other peoplemike the wiz writes: I agree, Mike. Be it a Bible or a Boeing 767, we hope that whoever holds it knows how to use it.
Religion is a bad thing in the wrong hands!Dan Carroll writes: Reminds me of the joke that I heard: Jesus Saves. Moses Invests. Two ideas, one post. And we pass the savings off to you. [This message has been edited by Phatboy, 02-17-2004] [This message has been edited by Phatboy, 02-17-2004]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18353 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
I believe that the scenario went like this. You say that they were
unable to comprehend Good and evil I say that before they ate the fruit, they had no need of an individual comprehension because they merely needed to obey God and allow Him to be their comprehension. Once they fell for the sales line of "Ye shall be as gods" then they ate the fruit and BOOM! They had comprehension. It was at THAT point that they took "Lets Make A Deal" to a whole new level. No longer was it door#1,2,or3. In essence, the view of reality became an infinite number of doors! Before the moment of the Fall, they were naked and unashamed. Why? Because they were covered. God covered them. God was their comprehension. God was their communion! They were unafraid. After the Fall, they were on their own. [This message has been edited by Phatboy, 02-19-2004]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18353 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
DC85 writes: I think that I get what you are saying. And God knew what was going to happen. For us to judge God as careless and unjust presupposes that we know some principle that is higher than Gods purpose. I say that we do not. We believe that God is just and good. Even if He was not, there is not much we can do about it. On a hijacked plane, people may fight the authority at the risk of death. Why fight a God who is Omnipotant? What even gave us the desire to do so?
If you don't comprehend the difference between Good and evil ... how Can you know that obeying God's command was the right thing to do?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18353 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
Well, mammuthus I must say this: You may be intellectually arrogant, but you are NOT self righteously arrogant! Can we talk?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18353 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
Arrogance takes many forms. In observing some fundamentalists, one is struck by their presupposition that the world is exactly how they see it. Bolstered by faith in God, they tend
to hide their ignorance behind other peoples websites and behind the Bible itself. They have placed their entire identity on a source of wisdom. In their defense, they believe the wisdom to be beyond human wisdom. Intellectuals can be self righteous in that they have studied many different sources of knowledge and wisdom. Some of them are still humble enough to acknowledge a power greater than themselves yet for many of them, the only thing greater than themselves is the collective wisdom and reason of humanity. They can not or will not conceive of a God that is mightier than this. Seeking to objectify God apart from Jesus Christ, they construct a God in their minds who surely must be unfair. Smiting people, wiping out entire nations, refusing to cure Typus or prevent widespread human suffering: What kind of God is this? It is one whom they have defined. For a true believer, however, God has been encountered. This encounter is more than a chance vision or experience. This encounter is ongoing. The relationship cannot be denied or wished away. To do so would be to deny reality itself. From a believers perspective, I'm Phatboy...signing out.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18353 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
crashfrog writes: I always hated the klingons, and they don't exist!
How could somebody hate something that doesn't exist?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18353 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
crashfrog writes: Who is this God of Love, Crashfrog? Does He exist or is the love the love in each of our hearts?
You don't think the God of love has a sense of humor?crashfrog writes: What do we care deeply about, Crashfrog? Is it someone who exists, like Chris? Just a thought or two to ponder.
In the western world we joke about the things we care deeply about.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18353 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
My point was that Religion becomes more than a dogmatic concept when it becomes personal. Chris is a personality with a story to tell and a faith to share. Shared faith is more than a Cuckoos Nest encounter group where one mans giant turtle is another mans Jesus who Rose from the Dead. Shared Faith is the very essence and cutting edge of humanity on a quest for meaning. Religion is only Evil if it is misused.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18353 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
mammuthus writes: Based on this statement, I see that you are a believer of some sort. Since you disagree with my assessment of collective human wisdom being the highest pinnacle,(for you) what is it that you believe in? Scientists have to live with the tentativity inherent in methodological naturalism and even the most arrogant ass of a scientist stands in awe of nature and at the amount we do not know.mammuthus writes: So now we are back to defining this supreme being. For me, He is Jesus Christ. God Incarnate. Crashfrog says to Chris: many intellectuals do believe in a supreme being And what I'm telling you is, when you refuse to take our statements at face-value, you're calling us liars. And I am puzzled at what Crashfrog means by "us." If he is referring to "us" as intellectuals, then I ask what type of an intellectual. A believer in a source higher than humanity or not? crashfrog writes: OK, Crashfrog. You say that God does not exist. Atheists have rejected Christ. Why? Based on judging His validity by their own source. Their source is either collective human wisdom or their own wisdom. My point is proven. To an atheist, human wisdom is the highest pinnacle. But I am an atheist. And it's impossible to be an atheist who hates god, because you can't hate what doesn't exist. So I'm forced to conclude that you're either talking about a group of people that you must know can't exist - god-hating atheists - or else you're insinuating that all atheists could be people who hate god. So you're essentially saying that there's a good chance that a given atheist is a liar.I'm not really offended. You just need to think about this a little more. Atheists aren't people who have rejected Christianity. They're people who don't believe in any god at allcrashfrog writes: Human nature tends to rebel at an authority higher than ourselves. Even for believers. But we are working on it.
If you're looking for people who hate God, you should probably start by looking at the people who still believe in God.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18353 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
If Religion is defined as being mans attempt to find or define God, I assert that religion is evil. If Religion is God imparting Truth into man and seeking relationship with us, I assert that Religion is NOT evil.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18353 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
Rom 1:22-23=Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like mortal man and birds and animals and reptiles. crashfrog writes: A fantasy roleplaying game thought by some fundamentalists to usher in "other" spirits to a persons mind. I'll paraphrase the Dungeons and Dragons Player's Handbook:crashfrog writes: And since Your "deity" is your own mind, you are not evil! Is that how you see it, crashfrog? Fine. I respect the religion that you have chosen. After all, if all truth is relative, who am I or my God to tell you any different? If My God is Not relative as a truth, but is absolute, you then have an issue with Him. Whew! This topic is getting old!
So, in short, is religion evil? Only if your deity is.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18353 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
schrafinator writes: Because the OT was a different dispensation towards humanity and does not apply to us today. The OT from The Law on was written to the Jewish people. Before the Law was given, the OT was written for the Pagan people with no religion. The NT from Mid Acts until the Rapture is written for us today. Why do I have to quote something from Jesus when the OT is part of the bible that you read and supposedly follow?At any rate, take a peek at Leviticus for a lot of laws about who to kill and why, according to God. Like I said, it was written for the Jews in those days.
Also, you cannot deny that there have been many Christians in the past (Crusades, Inquisition, Salem Witch Hunt) and a more than a few in the present (Ireland, abortion clinic terrorism, KKK terrorism) who have killed because their interpretation of their religion told them it was good to do. No, I do not deny this,but there is a question of whether one is labled "Christian" based on culture and practice versus one who is a true Christian by impartation of the Holy Spirit. The latter type of Christian would not have killed.
When interpreting the Bible, always remember that all scripture is written FOR us, but that not all scripture is written TO us. [This message has been edited by Phatboy, 02-24-2004] [This message has been edited by Phatboy, 02-24-2004]
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18353 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
schrafinator writes: And I am telling you that a Christian does not become a Christian merely by being born to religious parents. A Christian does not necessarily become a christian through rituals such as water baptism. A TRUE Christian, of which perhaps 3 out of ten are, is a Christian due to impartation of the Holy Spirit. While not perfect, these sort of people do not knowingly sin in such a way as you describe. I realize that you do not understand or perhaps even accept the fact that a spiritual impartation is possible. As long as you see our belief as originating in our own minds, it cannot be explained to you. It is too easy to wave away all behavior done in Christianity's name we consider terrible as being perpetrated by people who weren't "real" Christians. It is a way to avoid admitting that Christians, sometimes very large numbers of them, can and do perform and condone horrible acts, just like any other group of people.schrafinator writes: No. Most certainly not agnostic or atheist intellectuals who profess themselves wise in the study of the past, either. I would say that Biblical scholars who themselves recognize the living Spirit of God would be the true judges of scriptural interpretation. One who is accountable to a seperate intellectual source cannot logically say which scripture is inerrent and what it applies to. Only a Believer can do that. First of all, who is to say which part of the bible is more important than any other? You? ...according to you. Darn right! I would assume that you would not think me qualified to interpret the disciplines which YOU study. Why then could you even assume that you are qualified to interpret mine? Pagan people had their own religions, Phatboy! Where would you get the idea that they didn't have their own religions? Yes...much occult and nature religion was present before the gving of the Law to the Jews. Nimrod was a good example of a Pagan minded leader with occult worship. Much of this occult worship was adapted by the Catholic Church to bring in pagan believers. In this sense, the church was fallible and imperfect. There was a remnant>>a small number of monks and other true believers who kept the Absolute Truth of the Christian message alive! You must remember that the ones with True Spiritual impartation were not doing the killing and the self righteous power struggle that the political church was doing.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18353 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
If a group of people are standing around admiring a painting, each person can and does have an opinion of the meaning of the painting according to the artist, according to their own interpretation, and according to the style and the time that the painting was made. No one opinion is any more valid or true than any other opinion. The only individual who by right should have a higher opinion than the sum of the human opinion about the painting is the artist. To us as Christian believers, we have met the artist. The architect of the world that we live in. The master designer of the universe. He created the very definition of logic, order, love and law. He stands alone as our Messiah--our Savior--our God.
mammuthus writes: No, mammuthus. I am not talking about a book. I am talking about the subject of the book. Do you mean for you the highest pinnacle of wisdom is the unquestioning belief in a book even when read literally is often in complete contradiction with reality? This seems rather peculiar.I am talking about the personality and the character behind the book. The word was not created by human authors 80 years after the fact. The word was the word before humanity even entered the picture. The word was the word in the beginning. The Spirit behind, within, and throughout the word is not an imperfect fallible human one. The Spirit is from a higher source than mere human wisdom. Whether or not you choose to accept and believe in Him, He does exist. You may not understand Him. He understands you. You may not dare to believe because of the imperfections of humanity and a corrupt church. He has transcended that imperfection. You need not be convinced. I am not convinced that any of you are certain. I respect your intelligence on matters pertaining to science. I am no creationist in the literal sense, except as to the fact that He was in the beginning, He is now, and He always shall be! Try convincing Him that you made Him up!
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Phat Member Posts: 18353 From: Denver,Colorado USA Joined: Member Rating: 1.0 |
StephenBenYeshua writes: I think that it is inappropriate to refer to the trinity as "gods". The Tri-unity of God is a monotheistic concept, Stephen. At least in my belief.
But, as far as my study of the theology has gone, only the God Jehovah, with His Son, Yeshua, and Servant, the Holy Spirit, are gods that deserve love and consideration. The others are likely out to hurt me, and so I owe them no consideration.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024