|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total) |
| |
ChatGPT | |
Total: 916,914 Year: 4,171/9,624 Month: 1,042/974 Week: 1/368 Day: 1/11 Hour: 0/0 |
Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
Author | Topic: There is an appalling lack of historical evidence backing the Bible's veracity | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
I'm starting this thread spurred by Berreta's comment earlier today, that:
Berreta writes: There’s more than enough historical evidence backing the Bible’s veracity As a teenage evangelical Christian, I was continually fed the line that the Bible is historically verified to an unprecedented level, usually accompanied by the line that there is more evidence for the existence of Jesus than for Julius Ceasar. I had no reason to disagree... Some years later, having watched David Rohl's televised version of his "A Test of Time", I found a copy of the Bibilical Archaeological Review (BAR) in a local Christian bookshop. For some time I became an avid reader of the BAR and associated material. I was dumbstruck by what they had to say - the line I and so many others had been fed concerning the historical veracity of the Bible was pure bullshit. The BAR was full of the excitement at the very recent discovery of the Tel Dan Stele. This was the first evidence for David ever found??? WTF??? I mean, fair enough, historical evidence for anything in the Pentateuch would be expected to be sparse; but we had NOTHING on Saul, David, Solomon??? And let me point out that the BAR is an evangelical Christian publication - this is no secular, atheistic propaganda - they are desperate for historical evidence to back up the Bible. They are just honest enough to admit that in the main part, it does not exist. Interestingly, at the time this had a positive impact on my faith, as I have always been driven by mystery, not certainty... Anyway, the purpose of this thread is to point out in no uncertain terms that Berreta's claim is pure fantasy. Anything pre-Captivity presently stands as pure myth, and to declare otherwise is at best ignorance, often another case of lying-for-Jesus. The Bible: Accuracy and Inerrancy, I guess. Edited by cavediver, : Where to put it... Edited by cavediver, : Provided more links
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
You stated in no uncertain terms that it's all bunk. I think you need to check your reading skills, Nem. The only thing I am declaring as bunk are the endless Christian claims concerning the status of the Bible as a verified historical document. I think you may want to check your own objectivity here...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
I'm not sure why Cavediver would cite evidence for David's reign (the Tel Dan Stele) and then later say that anything pre-captivity is pure myth. I'm not sure you will find many scholars who are willing to say that the Tel Dan Stele is evidence sufficient to raise David's reign out of myth, but Brian is our resident expert so I will defer to him.
So I think the point that Cavediver was trying to make is that the evidence supporting the historicity of the Bible is much more sparse than is commonly acknowledged. This is the key point.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
I am simply telling you that what you thought didn't have any evidence supporting it, actually does. I am more than well aware of the evidence, Nem, and your words simply reinforce my point concerning your lack of reading skills. You may want to look up a correct definition of myth...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
It makes you wonder why they care so much about debunking Judeo-Christian figures, but could care less about secular persons of antiquity, and whether or not they really existed. which Judeo-Christian figures are being threatened with being debunked? And who is threatening this? As you say yourself,
Any real signs of someone existing over 3,000 years ago is expected to be sparse and so when someone claims that there is anything more than sparse evidence, I cry bullshit. As I'm sure you'll support, if you are aware of the facts.
It gives a glimpse in to the psychology of the person denying it, their motives for doing so with such fanaticism I don't like lies going hand-in-hand with Christianity, so when Berreta makes a false claim, I will call bullshit. I'm sorry you can't do the same...
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
Ray, please correct my ignorance. Please spell out all of this abundant evidence resident in the Britsh Museum, and any other evidence of which you are aware. Quite seriously, I would be very grateful. I await your detailed reply.
Edited by cavediver, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
Lets not be coy here. You need to read what I write - not invent what you think I am saying.
Fundy atheists websites spend inordinate amounts of time trying to subvert any evidence that would corroborate the bible Fuck you, Nem. I am a scientist and I am interested in one thing only - the truth. Why would I have any interest in subverting evidence of anything???
You continued on in a tirade, going on about how you concluded the bible is total bs. You need to read what I write - not invent what you think I am saying. Seriously, Nem, take a few deep breaths, and go back and read yet again what I wrote. Now, do you still really believe that I say that I have concluded that the bible is total bs?
To be upset at so-called Christians lying to further a claim is reasonable, and that really ticks me off too, maybe even more for me than you because I at least have some vested interest in it. Huh? From your posts I gather that I have been a Christian for a fuck-site longer than you And I'm shaking my fists at no-one, certainly not anyone in the sky. Whatever the state of my faith, I have more than enjoyed my time as a Christian and I'm not in anyway let down. I'm sorry if that is how you feel.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
You used the phrases "pure fantasy" So you are saying you agree with the following statement?
quote: If so, I'm sure you can produce something of near-infinite more substance than your examples? Don't get me wrong, I'm not dismissing your examples - they are fascinating. But if you think they are sufficient to raise the Biblical narratives from the level of myth to sound historical document, then I think your evidentiary requirements are rather weak.
"pure myth" Perhaps you, like Nem, need to be more acquainted with the technical concept of "myth" rather than the colloquial usage.
It has been my experiance that prejudiced, in general, is derived from ignorance, and is manifest by certain trademark logic flaws. Really You, like Nem, seem to think that I am approaching this as some atheistic funde. I have been an evangelical Christian for 24 years, and my viewpoint on this subject was initiated 14 years ago studying the relevant journals, publications and books. You don't seem to like the strength of the message, but you do very little to counter it.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
You have evaded the evidence posted. No Ray, I just don't possess the book to which you referenced. I was assuming you do possess the book as you feel confident that it is exceptional evidence. Please produce some examples from the book that will make us realise the historical veracity of the Bible.
We know that you have no knowledge in History or Archaeology. You should not be authoring topics of which you have no competence in while only seeking to make pro-Atheism rhetorical points. Ray, we can smell your fear from here
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
Bambootiger, you like Nem seem to want to read something into my posts that isn't there.
Perhaps you could point out where you feel the Bible is inaccurate in something it says which conflicts with a secular view of history. Where do I claim that the Bible is inaccurate? [ABE How do I know if it is accurate or not, if I do not have any evidence to back it up?] And not conflicting with secular history is perhaps the very first step down a very long road to demonstrating its historical veracity - and many Scholar would claim that there is significant conflict in multiple places. But I neither need to promote nor discuss these to make my point.
All you have done is to complain about a lack of information, which is an entirely negative approach. So why not prove something, or is all you are going to do is to tell others "prove it" and then discount whatever they say? Oh good grief, my whole OP is a generalised complaint against Christians claiming that the Bible is an historically verified document (or collection of documents.) I have no complaints whatsoever against the Bible itself. Your examples give a glimpse into how the OT contains some elements that may relate to real historical events. Great. I'm sure many more will be forthcoming over the decades ahead. How does this conflict with my OP? Edited by cavediver, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
Myth from Rakefet Dictionary Perhaps not where I would choose to pick my definition I hate to define via Wiki, but this puts it rather more succinctly than your source:
quote: The Fact that myths can & have been based on actual ocurrances means that even though the Biblical accounts may me myths there is aat least a sence of truth to many of the stories. I don't deny the existance of David, Solomon, Moses, Abraham etc. I just disagree that the Biblical accounts are totally historical. I can't disagree with any of this. You reading that, Nem? Bambootiger? Edited by cavediver, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
Hows that for a start junior? Just because you knew fuck-all by the time you were 27, doesn't mean that the rest of us were so incapacitated Let's face it, my seven year old son has a better command of English that you do. Anyway, this thread is not really about evidence for the miraculous... we're only looking for historical evidence for the events described in the pre-captivity OT. Nothing more difficult than that. So do you have any evidence of the 2 million strong Exodus? The Conquest? Saul, David and Solomon's kingdoms? Or were these all miraculous events as well, that would have been self-cleansing from history?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
Hi Brian, I was hoping you would play a prominent role in this thread - thanks for your input.
Can you turn things around, and give a list of what *you* think constitutes evidence for any of the pre-captivity OT narratives?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
Hi Bertot, please reply to Brian's post above concerning the Hittites. I would be very interested to hear your opinion, as it is directly related to this thread's topic. Thanks
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
cavediver Member (Idle past 3674 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
You seem to have missed the point, Bertot. This thread is mine and I am saying that there is no good historical evidence to back up the pre-captivity naratives in the Bible - and yes, I have read and studied the subject to some depth as described in my OP. My claim is that Christians have continually mis-potrayed the true picture of Biblical archaeology. If you disagree, then provide the evidence in your own words. We do not debate by link here at EvC.
If you have some evidence, bring it forth. So far you have mentioned the Hittites, and had your point utterly demolished by Brian. You have mentioned the comments of Dever and agaian Brian has pointed out that Dever has given up on the Exodus and Conquest - precisely the period of interest. Is that all you have got? If not, then when you have a moment, please present it.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024