...there is more evidence for the existence of Jesus than for Julius Ceasar
No-one doubts that there existed a man named Jesus (or Jeshua, actually) who lived in Judea in the first century. There were probably hundreds of such men as this was a very common name. However, the evidence that one of these men was god incarnate is pretty much the same as that Julius Caesar was god incarnate.
There is a form of didactic argument being used here that I call the 'derivative lie': "We have inscriptions and writings from first century Judea referring to a Jeshua. Therefore, we can derive that the new testament description of Jesus is accurate in all its detail."
™ Version 4.2
