Intelligent Design has no Place in the Classroom of Science

There seems to be great confusion that humans suffer because of the athiest philosophy of evolution. There IS very intellegent and very wise design in not only nature but in the entire universe that only the blind one would deny. Just look at how your body is intellegently designed and not even all evolutionists are able to explain (with their unsientific claims) how this meracoullous design have originated. They even fail to explain how a cell could emerge from nonliving matter by "chance". Isn't it more logical to believe in God's intellegent design in this universe rather than believe that this universe and life forms on earth emerged by "chance". Since when did science rely on chance? since the athiest philosephy of Darwin brainwashed humans' minds. And if you ask Any evolutionist how the human body (at the molecular level) evolved they will only give you imaginary scenario that lacks evidence, logic, and details because they always fail to explain evolution at the molecular level and there is no where in science where a very stark complex system such as a single cell emerge by "chance".

There seems to be great confusion that humans suffer because of the athiest philosophy of evolution. There IS very intellegent and very wise design in not only nature but in the entire universe that only the blind one would deny. Just look at how your body is intellegently designed and not even all evolutionists are able to explain (with their unsientific claims) how this meracoullous design have originated. They even fail to explain how a cell could emerge from nonliving matter by "chance". Isn't it more logical to believe in God's intellegent design in this universe rather than believe that this universe and life forms on earth emerged by "chance". Since when did science rely on chance? since the athiest philosephy of Darwin brainwashed humans' minds. And if you ask Any evolutionist how the human body (at the molecular level) evolved they will only give you imaginary scenario that lacks evidence, logic, and details because they always fail to explain evolution at the molecular level and there is no where in science where a very stark complex system such as a single cell can be formed by "chance".

Its very funny how you want to conclude a huge debate just by saying "NO". I dont bliam you because thats what evolutionist are only able to do: to deny God's existance and intellegent design with their ignorance.

(TOE is certainly not Atheistic/it is not a philosophy)
It seems that there are two errors in YOUR message. TOE is totally not compatable with creation and it was developed for one purpose: to deny God, and you say it is not athiestic! what error is bigger than that you have said.In addition, it is a philosophy and it is not based on evidence just like any other scientific theory it was firstly developed in Darwin's imagination when he assumed that species evolve. Just tell me, Have you(or any one else) ever observed a species evolve into DIFFERENT type of species? only if you can answer that than reply to me and dont make up imaginary evolutionary scenario as all evolutionist do.

So you say natural phenamonas? Tell me then, you see how planet Earth is perfectly conditioned for life, how do you explain that?1)Look at the percise distance from the sun and the moon that if they change a little that would destroy life on Earth.
2)specific speed of rotation and orbiting that if are slower of faster that can disturb the environment and cause life to end
3)Percision in the water cycle since the quantity of water that falls by rain is the same each year and if it change a little this will cause either flood or drought in many parts of the world
4)The magnetic belt around earth that is unique for our planet and protects it from harmful solar radiation otherwise we will die
5)The proper thikness of the atmosphere and its layers and how each layer has a tack specially designed to benifit life on earth
6) the great abundance of water with percise proportion with land that is not found in any other planet in the solar system.
7)The very percise degree of tilt in the axis of rotation of earth that is crucial for the seasons and if there is a one degree change the seasons' cycle will be disturbed and that will lead to the end of life on earth.I could go forever but i think that is enough. so do you choose to be so unscientific to calim that these are not intellegent designs created by God to suit life on earth and that all these conditions and much more all formed by "chance" because Earth knew somehow that life will form on it in the future?

Again a very funny statement. I can clearly see now why evolutionists and athiests are having a hard time believing in God: because of their IGNORANCE. what do you mean that non is true, go study something about our planet and when you are "scientific enough" you can post answers to argue against scientific facts, and if they are not true, tell me then What is true? even a grade 1 kid cannot deny these very basic facts that athiests ignore just to deny any sign of God. So im not going to busy my head with you if you keep denying the many signs of God with ignorance. By the way, I only want to see a scientific reply and not a reply that is based on ignorance and dogmatic athiestic believes.

So you dont like these systems, well try living on Earth without them and see if you can live. Im not talking about minor changes here but i mean how all these systems that are very crucial for life came to be in the first place, and no one can deny that there are numerous and very complex systems crucial for life so how can you claim they all came by "chance"? Minor changes are no problem but again i mean how all these systems came to be so well conditioned for life int the first place. By the way recheck your information because you are claiming some incorrect facts.

For all those who chalenged me and tried to disprove the existance of God:
Im moving out of this thread since you said im off-topic. So check my new post about the holy book of Qur'an and you will see a CLEAR AND DIRECT evidence for the existance or God:http://EvC Forum: Scientific Evidence for God in the holy Qur'an -->EvC Forum: Scientific Evidence for God in the holy Qur'an(edit: updated url - AdminNWR)This message has been edited by AdminNWR, 05-12-2006 07:13 PM

The problem is not with adaptation but it is with evolution. Each aspect of evolution denies the existance of a ceator so how can their be a medium between evolution and creation. By the way, since evolutionists are trying to fool believers to believe in "creatoin through evolution" why dont they accept this theory first, why dont evolutionists believe in God and first and then make others believe in evolution. Dont reply to me here cuz im moving out of the thread but check my above post.

OK i'll make this clear, do not run away and go above to check post 198 that will take you to a new post that is enough to prove the existance of God and to demollish athiesm and all its rotten philosphies (i.e. evolution), if you believe in God or not just check post 198 and its enough to hurl the tuth of God to all those who disbelieve.