Intelligent Design has no Place in the Classroom of Science

tell me, what expertise would a computer programmar and geophysicist have on DNA? why would we consider him a source on DNA? the reason we ask this is, I could look at DNA and say the same bloody thing as a programmer, why ask him?
you don't ask a plumber how to fix a car or ask a mechanic how to fix your sink. i'd ask this guy about the earth or programming not aboud DNA why do you care if we question the school? the fact is a christian school might say DNA is too complex for reasons outside of science. so sorry if we take this with a grain of salt{ABE:after reading back i realized, the school teachs a bible based education, well there you go, it doesn't really help them have any authority about DNA}This message has been edited by ReverendDG, 03-03-2006 03:37 AM

no its a matter of whether what you say is factual and knowlegeable. he may not have to have a phd in biology but he had better understand what biology is about and what biologist do, which means its better to be a biologist! god hasn't said anything in 3000 years if he ever said anything

there arn't 3 billion people that believe the bible is the true word of god, that would mean half of the human population and i know thats not true
and a lot of christian groups do not consider the bible to be 100% the word of god
oh and an arguement from majority is a sad falicy to use

this is is really off topic and unsupported by any evidenceas per the topic: the fact is ID doesn't explain anything better that current theories do, nor does it produce good science. I mean what would it intail - some intellegence some how in some unknown way produced the universe in an unexplained fashion - more than likely it was god - even if you use no god in the storie it teachs nothing that current science teachs

oh i know i just mean what would you teach if you allowed it
theres nothing to teach