Once again, like evos do all the time, you resort to theological arguments to try counter the concept of Intelligent Design. Suffice to say, you cannot muster good science arguments, and your theological arguments are very weak.
Well what do you expect? ID doesn't provide any arguments to begin with, at least nothing observable or recordable, most of ID is a cop-out "it couldn't be natural its too conplex, It must have been some designer" - since the designer would get questioned about who designed the designer ad nausum they just decided it was god - which is not science!
so it comes down to arguing on theological basis,since IDists can invoke their god figure