|
Author
|
Topic: Does Darwinism Equal "No God"?
|
robinrohan
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 234 of 298 (271873)
12-22-2005 11:52 PM
|
Reply to: Message 233 by randman
12-22-2005 11:49 PM
|
|
Re: "theory" again
So even as a student, I knew it was wrong, but evolutionary scientists kept insisting it was right well into 1997. So the creationists were right, and the evos wrong. You are wrong.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 233 by randman, posted 12-22-2005 11:49 PM | | randman has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 236 by randman, posted 12-22-2005 11:59 PM | | robinrohan has not replied |
|
robinrohan
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 237 of 298 (271880)
12-23-2005 12:01 AM
|
Reply to: Message 235 by randman
12-22-2005 11:56 PM
|
|
Re: What the evolutionary explanation is....
You are wrong in regard to the significance of Haeckel's drawings. I tried to explain this to you before, but you wouldn't listen.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 235 by randman, posted 12-22-2005 11:56 PM | | randman has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 242 by randman, posted 12-23-2005 12:23 AM | | robinrohan has replied |
|
robinrohan
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 243 of 298 (271890)
12-23-2005 12:27 AM
|
Reply to: Message 242 by randman
12-23-2005 12:23 AM
|
|
Re: What the evolutionary explanation is....
It doesn't matter. Haeckel substituted dogs for humans. He couldn't get the humans. But they were almost identical.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 242 by randman, posted 12-23-2005 12:23 AM | | randman has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 248 by randman, posted 12-23-2005 1:25 AM | | robinrohan has not replied |
|
robinrohan
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 280 of 298 (272274)
12-23-2005 9:52 PM
|
Reply to: Message 279 by Faith
12-23-2005 9:41 PM
|
|
Re: typical evo idiocy
If you are talking about *******, my book shows some drawings by him.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 279 by Faith, posted 12-23-2005 9:41 PM | | Faith has not replied |
|
robinrohan
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 281 of 298 (272275)
12-23-2005 9:52 PM
|
Reply to: Message 279 by Faith
12-23-2005 9:41 PM
|
|
Re: typical evo idiocy
If you are talking about *******, my book shows some drawings by him.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 279 by Faith, posted 12-23-2005 9:41 PM | | Faith has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 286 by Faith, posted 12-23-2005 10:02 PM | | robinrohan has replied |
|
robinrohan
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 284 of 298 (272281)
12-23-2005 9:57 PM
|
Reply to: Message 283 by randman
12-23-2005 9:54 PM
|
|
Re: typical evo idiocy
There rarely appears to be a genuine effort on the evo side to engage the topics honestly. I'm sorry you feel that way.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 283 by randman, posted 12-23-2005 9:54 PM | | randman has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 285 by randman, posted 12-23-2005 9:59 PM | | robinrohan has not replied |
|
robinrohan
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 289 of 298 (272292)
12-23-2005 10:09 PM
|
Reply to: Message 286 by Faith
12-23-2005 10:02 PM
|
|
Re: typical evo idiocy
I tried to explain it to Randman, but of course he wouldn't listen. Yes, ******* substituted dog embryos for humans. But it really didn't matter. The principle was accurate. My author pointed out that the dog embryos and the human embryos were almost identical.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 286 by Faith, posted 12-23-2005 10:02 PM | | Faith has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 290 by Faith, posted 12-23-2005 10:17 PM | | robinrohan has replied |
|
robinrohan
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 291 of 298 (272298)
12-23-2005 10:23 PM
|
Reply to: Message 290 by Faith
12-23-2005 10:17 PM
|
|
Re: typical evo idiocy
Oh brother I'm just telling you what my book says. Here's a quote: "Heackel had fraudulently substituted dog embryos for the human ones, but they were so similar to humans that these (if available) would have made the same point" (28). This message has been edited by robinrohan, 12-23-2005 09:24 PM
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 290 by Faith, posted 12-23-2005 10:17 PM | | Faith has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 292 by Faith, posted 12-23-2005 10:25 PM | | robinrohan has replied |
|
robinrohan
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 293 of 298 (272301)
12-23-2005 10:31 PM
|
Reply to: Message 292 by Faith
12-23-2005 10:25 PM
|
|
Re: typical evo idiocy
I hope you realize that that information is cause for starting an entire new thread on *******. Please. The point is that the idea was correct, according to my author. My book was published in 2001.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 292 by Faith, posted 12-23-2005 10:25 PM | | Faith has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 294 by Faith, posted 12-23-2005 10:39 PM | | robinrohan has replied |
|
robinrohan
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 295 of 298 (272311)
12-23-2005 10:51 PM
|
Reply to: Message 294 by Faith
12-23-2005 10:39 PM
|
|
Re: typical evo idiocy
Well, I've found Randman's points credible so I'm now in the position of doubting Mayr. I don't think it matters, Faith, what authors I use. You'll doubt them all. It doesn't matter what evidence I present. You'll dismiss it with contempt. However, I will soldier on.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 294 by Faith, posted 12-23-2005 10:39 PM | | Faith has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 296 by Faith, posted 12-23-2005 11:01 PM | | robinrohan has replied |
|
robinrohan
Inactive Member
|
|
|
Message 297 of 298 (272313)
12-23-2005 11:05 PM
|
Reply to: Message 296 by Faith
12-23-2005 11:01 PM
|
|
Re: typical evo idiocy
If you feel I'm treating you with contempt I think the discussion is simply over. Actually, I'm enjoying it. Don't take me too literally, Faith. I'm just an old joker. I have some things in mind that I think will convince you.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 296 by Faith, posted 12-23-2005 11:01 PM | | Faith has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2