Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,911 Year: 4,168/9,624 Month: 1,039/974 Week: 366/286 Day: 9/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is it Rape or Not
docpotato
Member (Idle past 5077 days)
Posts: 334
From: Portland, OR
Joined: 07-18-2003


Message 61 of 260 (360272)
10-31-2006 8:52 PM
Reply to: Message 50 by Faith
10-31-2006 8:16 PM


Re: Deuteronomy 21 in context
"rightly dividing the word of truth."
I'm not familiar with this phrase, can you tell me what it means?
God's Law was an improvement over ancient law, as has already been said.
But, with regard to the screwing of captive ladies, it wasn't all that much better. It provided a mourning period prior to the rape, a rather nice gesture... it's kind of like God giving a woman about to be raped the chance to undress herself instead of having her expensive clothes torn asunder, I suppose.
I assume our laws now, after centuries of Biblical influence, are better than the old.
Curious. Usually one hears people decrying the downfall of civilization as we let homosexuals live, let people get divorced, let all kind of loony religions into the public sphere, and, generally, allow others to go about and do their thing until they start infringing on the rights of others. It's nice to know that these things are derived from the Bible's influence.
Edited by docpotato, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 50 by Faith, posted 10-31-2006 8:16 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by Faith, posted 10-31-2006 11:29 PM docpotato has replied
 Message 77 by Archer Opteryx, posted 10-31-2006 11:40 PM docpotato has not replied

  
kuresu
Member (Idle past 2543 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 62 of 260 (360276)
10-31-2006 8:59 PM
Reply to: Message 19 by Faith
10-31-2006 4:05 PM


Re: Deuteronomy 21 in context
Am I misreading this, or did you just give Hammurabi's credit to Moses?
The law of an eye for an eye, for instance, with its exactness of fit between punishment and crime, is a huge improvement over the habit of overkill in the taking of revenge that prevailed in that area at the time. This practice is demonstrated, for instance, in Jacob's sons' murdering of the whole family of Shechem for his rape of their sister, four hundred or so years before Moses. The Law of God tempers such excesses of revenge
Because quite frankly, historians recognize the Code of Hammurabi as the source for the "eye for an eye" concept. Not moses.
Unless, of course, I misread your post.

Want to help give back to the world community? Did you know that your computer can help? Join the newest TeamEvC Climate Modelling to help improve climate predictions for a better tomorrow.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 19 by Faith, posted 10-31-2006 4:05 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 66 by Faith, posted 10-31-2006 10:59 PM kuresu has replied

  
kuresu
Member (Idle past 2543 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 63 of 260 (360280)
10-31-2006 9:08 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by Faith
10-31-2006 8:08 PM


Re: Deuteronomy 21 in context
and the little boys were guilty?
you mean pre-pubescant boys were guilty of seducing israel?
please forgive me for laughing my head of at this.
little boys pre-pubescant boys guilty of seduction? they don't even know where to put it yet, how the heck can they be guilty?
Edited by kuresu, : No reason given.

Want to help give back to the world community? Did you know that your computer can help? Join the newest TeamEvC Climate Modelling to help improve climate predictions for a better tomorrow.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by Faith, posted 10-31-2006 8:08 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 70 by Faith, posted 10-31-2006 11:05 PM kuresu has replied

  
iceage 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5944 days)
Posts: 1024
From: Pacific Northwest
Joined: 09-08-2003


Message 64 of 260 (360282)
10-31-2006 9:17 PM
Reply to: Message 60 by Faith
10-31-2006 8:52 PM


Re: Deuteronomy 21 in context
They were giving offerings to the LORD which typically meant offerings that sent sweet smoke to heaven.
This is fodder for another topic. I will write one when I get time.
Edited by iceage, : No reason given.
Edited by iceage, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 60 by Faith, posted 10-31-2006 8:52 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 67 by Faith, posted 10-31-2006 11:01 PM iceage has not replied

  
iceage 
Suspended Member (Idle past 5944 days)
Posts: 1024
From: Pacific Northwest
Joined: 09-08-2003


Message 65 of 260 (360285)
10-31-2006 9:23 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by Faith
10-31-2006 8:05 PM


Re: Deuteronomy 21 in context
Faith writes:
Some of the Bible is simple historical reports that we trust as truthful reports because God oversaw their reporting. It certainly doesn't mean that God approves of everything that is reported. What exactly are you talking about.
Are we not talking about your god's Commands here!!! You know "Thus sayeth the Lord" stuff. I am assuming you believe that your god approves of his own commands.
Edited by iceage, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by Faith, posted 10-31-2006 8:05 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 68 by Faith, posted 10-31-2006 11:02 PM iceage has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 66 of 260 (360292)
10-31-2006 10:59 PM
Reply to: Message 62 by kuresu
10-31-2006 8:59 PM


Re: Deuteronomy 21 in context
Because quite frankly, historians recognize the Code of Hammurabi as the source for the "eye for an eye" concept. Not moses.
Well, that's news to me, but if so, then maybe people will stop complaining that eye for an eye is unjust, rather than the perfect equality it obviously is, since of course we all know that Hammurabi was a lot more just than Moses, and certainly than Moses' God.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 62 by kuresu, posted 10-31-2006 8:59 PM kuresu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 73 by kuresu, posted 10-31-2006 11:20 PM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 67 of 260 (360294)
10-31-2006 11:01 PM
Reply to: Message 64 by iceage
10-31-2006 9:17 PM


Re: Deuteronomy 21 in context
They were giving offerings to the LORD which typically meant offerings that sent sweet smoke to heaven.
This is fodder for another topic. I will write one when I get time.
Yes but there's nothing more to say about it than that it is outrageously absurd to read human sacrifice into the Old Testament, where God is always condemning it. But I understand that unbelievers don't mind creating contradictions and attributing them to God.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 64 by iceage, posted 10-31-2006 9:17 PM iceage has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 68 of 260 (360295)
10-31-2006 11:02 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by iceage
10-31-2006 9:23 PM


Re: Deuteronomy 21 in context
If you are talking about commands you are going to have to get a lot more specific about what you are referring to. Quotes, say. I'm not a mindreader.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by iceage, posted 10-31-2006 9:23 PM iceage has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 80 by iceage, posted 11-01-2006 12:28 AM Faith has not replied

  
Jazzns
Member (Idle past 3941 days)
Posts: 2657
From: A Better America
Joined: 07-23-2004


Message 69 of 260 (360296)
10-31-2006 11:03 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by Faith
10-31-2006 6:35 PM


Re: Deuteronomy 21 in context
No, I don't think he is. Jesus was vastly different in both word and action.
You can call me a picker and chooser if you like but I prefer a belief that I don't have to play games with in order to reconcile the VAST CHASM of differences in the characterizations of God. Especially when it forces me to endorse genocidal atrocities all in the name of righteous justice.
Edited by Jazzns, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Faith, posted 10-31-2006 6:35 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by Faith, posted 10-31-2006 11:08 PM Jazzns has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 70 of 260 (360297)
10-31-2006 11:05 PM
Reply to: Message 63 by kuresu
10-31-2006 9:08 PM


Re: Deuteronomy 21 in context
They were considered to be sure to grow up to support the overall sin of the Midianites against Israel, as boys grow up to identify with their fathers and their nation in a way girls weren't expected to -- so say some of the commentators.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by kuresu, posted 10-31-2006 9:08 PM kuresu has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 72 by kuresu, posted 10-31-2006 11:18 PM Faith has replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 71 of 260 (360298)
10-31-2006 11:08 PM
Reply to: Message 69 by Jazzns
10-31-2006 11:03 PM


Re: Deuteronomy 21 in context
No, I don't think he is. Jesus was vastly different in both word and action.
Everything Jesus was is foreshadowed in the God of the Old Testament. And the prophecies also show that the Messiah is to be Yahweh in the flesh. They are one and the same.
You can call me a picker and chooser if you like but I prefer a belief that I don't have to play games with in order to reconcile the VAST CHASM of differences in the characterizations of God. Especially when it forces me to endorse genocidal atrocities all in the name of righteous justice.
There's no playing games except in the flesh. The Spirit reveals the whole.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by Jazzns, posted 10-31-2006 11:03 PM Jazzns has not replied

  
kuresu
Member (Idle past 2543 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 72 of 260 (360299)
10-31-2006 11:18 PM
Reply to: Message 70 by Faith
10-31-2006 11:05 PM


Re: Deuteronomy 21 in context
but if you've killed the fathers, and let the young survive, they grow up in your culture. they identify with your culture.

Want to help give back to the world community? Did you know that your computer can help? Join the newest TeamEvC Climate Modelling to help improve climate predictions for a better tomorrow.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 70 by Faith, posted 10-31-2006 11:05 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by Faith, posted 10-31-2006 11:30 PM kuresu has not replied

  
kuresu
Member (Idle past 2543 days)
Posts: 2544
From: boulder, colorado
Joined: 03-24-2006


Message 73 of 260 (360302)
10-31-2006 11:20 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by Faith
10-31-2006 10:59 PM


Re: Deuteronomy 21 in context
you oughta read some of his laws--the seignors (equivalent of nobility) could kill a person of lesser rank by just paying a small fine. If he killed another seignor, he himself was killed.
now tell me, how is that "eye for eye"?

Want to help give back to the world community? Did you know that your computer can help? Join the newest TeamEvC Climate Modelling to help improve climate predictions for a better tomorrow.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by Faith, posted 10-31-2006 10:59 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by Faith, posted 10-31-2006 11:35 PM kuresu has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 74 of 260 (360304)
10-31-2006 11:29 PM
Reply to: Message 61 by docpotato
10-31-2006 8:52 PM


Re: Deuteronomy 21 in context
"rightly dividing the word of truth."
I'm not familiar with this phrase, can you tell me what it means?
quote:
2Timothy 2:15 Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
It means there are many ways to read and to misread the scriptures, and it's a good thing to read it right.
God's Law was an improvement over ancient law, as has already been said.
But, with regard to the screwing of captive ladies, it wasn't all that much better.
Yeah, and I guess you would know because why?
It provided a mourning period prior to the rape, a rather nice gesture... it's kind of like God giving a woman about to be raped the chance to undress herself instead of having her expensive clothes torn asunder, I suppose.
How free you feel to judge God.
I assume our laws now, after centuries of Biblical influence, are better than the old.
Curious. Usually one hears people decrying the downfall of civilization as we let homosexuals live, let people get divorced, let all kind of loony religions into the public sphere, and, generally, allow others to go about and do their thing until they start infringing on the rights of others. It's nice to know that these things are derived from the Bible's influence.
Good points and obviously I spoke too soon. I was thinking in terms of the context we are discussing. Women's rights would not have happened without the Bible.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by docpotato, posted 10-31-2006 8:52 PM docpotato has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 86 by docpotato, posted 11-01-2006 2:47 AM Faith has not replied

  
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1474 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 75 of 260 (360305)
10-31-2006 11:30 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by kuresu
10-31-2006 11:18 PM


Re: Deuteronomy 21 in context
but if you've killed the fathers, and let the young survive, they grow up in your culture. they identify with your culture.
Many would remember the slaughter of their fathers. They would not fail to understand they were Midianites in any case.
Anyway, all I know is that's what the commentators say and they do tend to read a lot of literature about history and the cultures involved in the Biblical accounts.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by kuresu, posted 10-31-2006 11:18 PM kuresu has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 78 by Taz, posted 10-31-2006 11:42 PM Faith has replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024