This concerns rgb wanting to be part of Herepton's (Ray's) topic.
Does constructively exploring a concept neccessarily require disagreement? Surely you can effectively develop an idea with someone who agrees with your fundamental outlook?
I agree. I think that it would be a good thing to see two or more creationists debate the details of their "theory". This seems to be something VERY rarely done.
Now, if rgb is only going to be taking a "devils advocate" postion, then I think Ray/rgb interaction would be a false debate. But if they do indeed have some differences in position, I say "let them go at it".
It would be a creationist version of something like Quetzal and Mamuthus arguing about some detail(s) in evolution theory.
Minnemooseus and/or Adminnemooseus
™ Version 4.2
