Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 368/286 Day: 11/13 Hour: 1/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Showcase Forum Issues and Requests
PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 48 of 302 (317986)
06-05-2006 3:02 PM
Reply to: Message 47 by nwr
06-05-2006 2:58 PM


Re: Creationist theory
Remember that he's using his own idiosyncratic definition of "creationism".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by nwr, posted 06-05-2006 2:58 PM nwr has seen this message but not replied

PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 256 of 302 (368643)
12-09-2006 1:05 PM
Reply to: Message 247 by randman
12-08-2006 10:55 PM


Re: no lies about you
Randman I have no wish to request access to any of your showcase threads. I have had quite enough of your vicious lunacy to know that you have no real interest real debate. Probably because of your many defeats.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 247 by randman, posted 12-08-2006 10:55 PM randman has not replied

PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 273 of 302 (369080)
12-11-2006 4:03 PM
Reply to: Message 272 by randman
12-11-2006 3:54 PM


Re: the double-standard
Got a question for you Randman. Do you understand that:
"If X is true then Y is true" does not mean "Y is always true" ?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 272 by randman, posted 12-11-2006 3:54 PM randman has not replied

PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 290 of 302 (369224)
12-12-2006 2:32 AM
Reply to: Message 272 by randman
12-11-2006 3:54 PM


Re: the double-standard
I guess I'm going to have to repeat the question.
quote:
Got a question for you Randman. Do you understand that:
"If X is true then Y is true" does not mean "Y is always true" ?
Is it too difficult for you to answer ? There is a point to it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 272 by randman, posted 12-11-2006 3:54 PM randman has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 292 by AdminBuzsaw, posted 12-12-2006 9:05 AM PaulK has replied

PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 293 of 302 (369271)
12-12-2006 10:48 AM
Reply to: Message 292 by AdminBuzsaw
12-12-2006 9:05 AM


Re: the double-standard
I have good reasons for asking that are relevant to the ongoing discussion. And I think that it is necessary to prod a little to get an answer.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 292 by AdminBuzsaw, posted 12-12-2006 9:05 AM AdminBuzsaw has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 294 by randman, posted 12-12-2006 1:09 PM PaulK has replied

PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 295 of 302 (369294)
12-12-2006 1:15 PM
Reply to: Message 294 by randman
12-12-2006 1:09 PM


Re: the double-standard
I'm interested in learning whether you understand the difference.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 294 by randman, posted 12-12-2006 1:09 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 296 by randman, posted 12-12-2006 1:23 PM PaulK has replied

PaulK
Member
Posts: 17828
Joined: 01-10-2003
Member Rating: 2.5


Message 297 of 302 (369305)
12-12-2006 1:58 PM
Reply to: Message 296 by randman
12-12-2006 1:23 PM


Re: the double-standard
I just want to take it step by step. Do you understand that there is a difference or not ? There's surely no need to be evasive over such a simple point.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 296 by randman, posted 12-12-2006 1:23 PM randman has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 298 by NosyNed, posted 12-12-2006 2:13 PM PaulK has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024