Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,915 Year: 4,172/9,624 Month: 1,043/974 Week: 2/368 Day: 2/11 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Too much moderation on these boards?
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 46 of 201 (317647)
06-04-2006 3:46 PM
Reply to: Message 45 by Faith
06-04-2006 2:54 PM


Re: For The Record
Faith writes:
If the thread were neutrally titled, something like "History of East-West conflict since ......" this wouldn't have to have come up until it's actually stated or implied in the thread later.
Not to mention that throughout the thread all of Jar's aggression implications fingered the West as the aggressors. He not only set the tone of the thread up implicating the West as aggressive, but continued in that tone, thus setting up a debate due to the alternative views of others. But alas, debate was simply disallowed as off topic.
As for religion, well Jar himself introduced that both in the title, i.e. Islamic world and in recent post or two, the Christian West...., thus, implicating Christianity as the ideology of the alleged aggressors.
Mind you, I'm not saying there was no aggression atol by the West. I'm saying it was not solely from the West.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Faith, posted 06-04-2006 2:54 PM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 56 by arachnophilia, posted 06-05-2006 12:34 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 122 of 201 (318247)
06-06-2006 9:19 AM
Reply to: Message 96 by NosyNed
06-05-2006 7:59 PM


Re: facts or not
NN writes:
Almost all of us (on both sides) agree that science has nothing to say about the creation of the universe (yet or maybe forever). However, it can make statements about specific ways that it could have been created.
I'm afraid I can't agree at all. Imo, secularist mainline science's whole concept of cosmology and space expansionism ultimately hinges on it's perception of the creation of the universe.
1. It's teaching on the age of the universe implicates creation/origin. For the most part it assumes that the universe is about 15 billion years old.
2. It teaches that space expanded from a singularity of mega-high density.
3. "Of how it could have been created?" No, Of how it had to be created, because those who disagree are considered "unscientific."

BUZSAW B 4 U 2 C Y BUZ SAW

This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by NosyNed, posted 06-05-2006 7:59 PM NosyNed has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 124 by NosyNed, posted 06-06-2006 11:00 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024