Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,909 Year: 4,166/9,624 Month: 1,037/974 Week: 364/286 Day: 7/13 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Too much moderation on these boards?
Brian
Member (Idle past 4989 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 140 of 201 (318321)
06-06-2006 12:44 PM
Reply to: Message 137 by robinrohan
06-06-2006 12:24 PM


Re: Whats wrong with bias?
Moose ASSUMED I was a whiny creationist.
And how do we know that you aren't?
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 137 by robinrohan, posted 06-06-2006 12:24 PM robinrohan has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 141 by PaulK, posted 06-06-2006 12:47 PM Brian has not replied
 Message 143 by sidelined, posted 06-06-2006 12:53 PM Brian has replied
 Message 145 by iano, posted 06-06-2006 12:54 PM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4989 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 146 of 201 (318335)
06-06-2006 12:57 PM
Reply to: Message 143 by sidelined
06-06-2006 12:53 PM


Re: Whats wrong with bias?
I think he is changing his opinion on nihilism.
I was going to get all deep and philosophical but I can't be arsed now!
But Robin and Faith do seem to be very cozy not quite a Samson and Delilah though!
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 143 by sidelined, posted 06-06-2006 12:53 PM sidelined has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 151 by Faith, posted 06-06-2006 1:58 PM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4989 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 147 of 201 (318336)
06-06-2006 12:59 PM
Reply to: Message 145 by iano
06-06-2006 12:54 PM


Re: Whats wrong with bias?
I think we all know our opponents positions that well that it would be easy to act out.
But it was tongue in cheek.
Brian.
(I am a YEC BTW)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 145 by iano, posted 06-06-2006 12:54 PM iano has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4989 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 148 of 201 (318342)
06-06-2006 1:13 PM
Reply to: Message 142 by iano
06-06-2006 12:52 PM


Re: Science & Religion
It should be naturally deselected
And who do you suggest that we debate with once all the creationists are gone?
The problem for my subjects here is that most of my opponents are starting off with a faulty approach to what history and archaeology actually is. In their world anything is possible, in the academic world we have to justify our conclusions, archaeologist Lewis Bindford calls it 'inference justification'. On this site arguments are supposed to be supported, and historical enquiry is a lot like scientific enquiry, but most of the creo crew don't seem to get it.
There has to be bias in favour of the creos, just as a first year high school student would get more wiggle room than a post graduate.
You cannot hold them up to the same standard if one doesn't understand what the standards are. What we can hope for though is that some of the creos may come to understand what critical enquiry is.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 142 by iano, posted 06-06-2006 12:52 PM iano has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 149 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 06-06-2006 1:37 PM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4989 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 150 of 201 (318357)
06-06-2006 1:55 PM
Reply to: Message 149 by Cold Foreign Object
06-06-2006 1:37 PM


Re: Science & Religion
Hi Ray,
To what degree is your admitted atheism responsible for these opinions ?
It doesn't have anything to do with it. It is comon sense really.
If two people are debating an event from the past, and one is using the historio-sceintific method and the other isn't, then there are going to be difficulties. If it is a critical discussion of a past event than both parties need to be playing by the same rules. If I discuss a theological argument I can discuss it from a faith based angle instead of applying a method of enquiry that is not valid.
Starting out with a premise that a source is correct, regardless of what evidence you are going to find, is not the way to carry out an academic historical enquiry.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 149 by Cold Foreign Object, posted 06-06-2006 1:37 PM Cold Foreign Object has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4989 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 152 of 201 (318371)
06-06-2006 2:58 PM
Reply to: Message 151 by Faith
06-06-2006 1:58 PM


Friendly advice....
Wish God would exercise that power through me to influence him and many others.
Be careful, Yahweh has a reputation for being rather harsh on those who worship false gods.
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 151 by Faith, posted 06-06-2006 1:58 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 153 by Faith, posted 06-06-2006 3:25 PM Brian has replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4989 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 154 of 201 (318374)
06-06-2006 3:33 PM
Reply to: Message 153 by Faith
06-06-2006 3:25 PM


Re: Friendly advice....
He doesn't have a son.
I'll keep you a nice warm seat
Brian.
Edited by AdminNosy, : No reason given.
Edited by AdminNosy, : Topic

This message is a reply to:
 Message 153 by Faith, posted 06-06-2006 3:25 PM Faith has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024