Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,929 Year: 4,186/9,624 Month: 1,057/974 Week: 16/368 Day: 16/11 Hour: 0/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   On Judging Others
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1498 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 22 of 121 (340603)
08-16-2006 6:47 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Faith
08-16-2006 5:57 PM


Re: political correctness
Indians "Native Americans"
I don't get why this is something that conservatives have a hard-on about. It's not "political correctness", whatever the hell that is; it's the correction of a misnomer. The people you refer to are not from India. Why on Earth would we call them "indians"?
It's the arrogance of the conservative, I guess; their arrogant assumption that the peoples of the world look to them to know what the hell they should call themselves.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Faith, posted 08-16-2006 5:57 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 25 by Faith, posted 08-16-2006 6:51 PM crashfrog has replied
 Message 33 by Quetzal, posted 08-16-2006 7:23 PM crashfrog has not replied
 Message 35 by MangyTiger, posted 08-16-2006 7:26 PM crashfrog has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1498 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 29 of 121 (340615)
08-16-2006 7:03 PM
Reply to: Message 25 by Faith
08-16-2006 6:51 PM


Re: political correctness
If it were merely a correction of a mistake, the outraged moralistic attitude would not be there.
Come on. Get real.
How long do you think it was before people realized that North America and India were two different places? And yet, they persisted in the term "indians" for people who weren't at all indian.
The "mistake" persisted for centuries because of an entire culture's arrogant presumption that they got to determine what other people were called. Sure, there's a little bit of outrage there. But I guess cultural offense only counts to you if it's white people being offended.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Faith, posted 08-16-2006 6:51 PM Faith has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1498 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 53 of 121 (340673)
08-16-2006 10:50 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by Hyroglyphx
08-16-2006 9:13 PM


Re: political correctness
In a news conference at Chicago O'Hare airport, Bush (Sr. is who we're talking about, BTW) addressed the entire nation:
quote:
I don't know that atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots. This is one nation under God.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-16-2006 9:13 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-16-2006 10:55 PM crashfrog has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1498 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 77 of 121 (341153)
08-18-2006 5:06 PM
Reply to: Message 73 by Faith
08-18-2006 4:42 PM


Re: White and european
Oh, I'm sorry. I'm sure Schraf and the rest of us weren't aware that in the Coffeehouse, the rule was that you could just make up your own facts.
What you call "pedantry", the rest of us call "not being wrong." Maybe you should consider how mature it appears that every time you're corrected on even the most basic point, you through a huge bitch-fit about how unreasonable it is for the rest of us to expect you to be largely correct on the facts.
Apparently you think it's ok to be wrong on the details if you get the bigger picture correct. I would have thought that after two years of embarassing debate failures on your part here at EvC, you would have realized that doesn't seem to be working. It's because you see being accurate as "pedantic" that you're almost always wrong about everything else. How can you derive a correct view from incorrect facts?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 73 by Faith, posted 08-18-2006 4:42 PM Faith has not replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1498 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 78 of 121 (341154)
08-18-2006 5:08 PM
Reply to: Message 74 by Faith
08-18-2006 4:46 PM


Re: The Error Schraf
Thank you for the totally gratuitous personal attack.
You'd know all about those, wouldn't you? No, I haven't forgotten, nor have I forgotten that you still haven't apologized.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by Faith, posted 08-18-2006 4:46 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 79 by Faith, posted 08-18-2006 5:42 PM crashfrog has replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1498 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 80 of 121 (341162)
08-18-2006 6:11 PM
Reply to: Message 79 by Faith
08-18-2006 5:42 PM


Re: The Error Schraf
How gallant of you and Nosy to support Schraf's insult and irrelevant baiting posts against little old me.
Oh, poor baby! Easy enough for her to insult everybody else, but it's obviously too much to be borne when others return the favor. How dare they hit back!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 79 by Faith, posted 08-18-2006 5:42 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 81 by Faith, posted 08-18-2006 6:14 PM crashfrog has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024