Author
|
Topic: On Judging Others
|
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 26 of 121 (340607)
08-16-2006 6:53 PM
|
Reply to: Message 1 by robinrohan 08-15-2006 2:46 PM
|
|
What does judging mean?
The more I think about this injunction that we must not judge others, the sillier it seems. We judge people all the time. Moreover, why is the judgment of others always thought of in a negative sense? They are also favorable judgments. They are many different kinds of judgment. What you are saying is very valid. But when Jesus told us not to judge others it was in direct context with hypocritical people who condemn people for a certain action, but then turn around and do the same thing. That's why He went on to describe what its like with the 'plank in the eye.' But we are supposed to recognize people and how they act. I don't think there is no ambiguity concerning that. “If chance be the father of all flesh then disaster is his rainbow in the sky. And when you hear of, state of emergencies, sniper kills ten, youths go looting, bomb blasts school, it is but the sound of man worshipping his maker” -Steve Turner
This message is a reply to: | | Message 1 by robinrohan, posted 08-15-2006 2:46 PM | | robinrohan has replied |
|
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 32 of 121 (340624)
08-16-2006 7:18 PM
|
Reply to: Message 16 by Faith 08-16-2006 6:20 PM
|
|
Re: political correctness
Well, you could ask that of Susan Sontag, famous leftie who wrote for the leftist Partisan Review, and is famous for denouncing the white race Interesting story about Susan Sontag and the Walt Disney Corporation. Sontag, among other such Lefties as Michael Moore, absolutely hate the white race. In an ironic twist of fate, they both happen to be white. But that is neither here nor there. Anyway, this is but one of her more hyperbolic sentiments. Sontag wrote in one of her essays, "The white race is the cancer of human history. It is the white race and it alone-- its ideologies and inventions-- which eradicates autonomous civilizations wherever it spreads, which has upset the ecological balance of the planet, which now threatens the very existence of life." -Susan Sontag In all her malcontent, she wrote further in her essay, entitled, The Cancer of Human History. It continues on thus in more poetic fashion: "You think you own whatever land you land on. The earth is just a dead thing you can claim. But I know every rock and tree and creature has a life, has a spirit, has a name. You think the only people who are people are the people that look like you. But if you walk the footsteps of a stranger, you'll learn things you never knew you knew." -Susan Sontag If none of you have children just yet, you might not know that this poem was converted by the Disney Corp into lyrics, verbatim, for the movie Pocahantas. In the cartoon, Pocahantas sings this to Capt. John Smith in sort of a musical scolding. Disney won the Oscar for this little duet. Figuring the name "Cancer of Human History" might be viewed as unPC, it was changed to "Colors of the Wind." “If chance be the father of all flesh then disaster is his rainbow in the sky. And when you hear of, state of emergencies, sniper kills ten, youths go looting, bomb blasts school, it is but the sound of man worshipping his maker” -Steve Turner
This message is a reply to: | | Message 16 by Faith, posted 08-16-2006 6:20 PM | | Faith has not replied |
|
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member
|
Re: What does judging mean?
I'm not sure, but I think you may be right about that. But the ubiquity of the "judge not" idea is not in American culture due to Christianity. No, I completely understand. I mean, this coined phrase gets thrown around quite a bit, particularly in American society. But if it really meant don't judge people in this way, we'd have no court system and ultimately no justice. I really believe, based on the Scriptures, that Jesus is asking us, "Why are you concerned about these other people when you are a chief offender? Don't you realize that you are a hypocrite?" This is what I've always understood it to mean. Perhaps in Aramaic or Hebrew its more clear than the English rendering. I'd go look in my concordance, but uh, that would require effort on my part. “If chance be the father of all flesh then disaster is his rainbow in the sky. And when you hear of, state of emergencies, sniper kills ten, youths go looting, bomb blasts school, it is but the sound of man worshipping his maker” -Steve Turner
This message is a reply to: | | Message 30 by robinrohan, posted 08-16-2006 7:05 PM | | robinrohan has not replied |
|
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 37 of 121 (340630)
08-16-2006 7:31 PM
|
Reply to: Message 33 by Quetzal 08-16-2006 7:23 PM
|
|
Re: political correctness
Actually, crash, I think the objection to "Native American" stems from an objection to anything-hyphenated-American. I've always disliked the concept. You're either American (as in "citizen of the United States"), or you're not. The term American itself is a crappy one, IMO. It rightly irritates Canadians, Nicaraguans, Ecuadorans, etc, who are all as rightfully termed Americans as the damn gringos. This is an excellent post. I agree, if you are born in the US, then you are an American. You aren't an African American or a Native American or a Mexican American or a Eurpoean American, you are just an American. And if people would like to stop all of this segregation, perhaps they should stop segregating themselves by causing this rift that is completely unneccesary. Your second point is just as good. For whatever reason, America claimed for itself the name adopted by Amerigo Vespucci, "America." I mean, I'm half Ecuadorian myself and even a very Castillian surname, but it doesn't bother me. Then again, I'm an American, so I don't know how South or other North Amricans feel about it. As far as I can tell, Native Americans would like to be referred to as their tribe affiliation. A Hopi does not consider a Navajo to be the same, even though they likely have similar DNA. But I guess its the same as why someone from Norway wouldn't want to be affiliated with Swedes, even if they share Nordic traits. “If chance be the father of all flesh then disaster is his rainbow in the sky. And when you hear of, state of emergencies, sniper kills ten, youths go looting, bomb blasts school, it is but the sound of man worshipping his maker” -Steve Turner
This message is a reply to: | | Message 33 by Quetzal, posted 08-16-2006 7:23 PM | | Quetzal has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 46 by nator, posted 08-16-2006 8:48 PM | | Hyroglyphx has replied | | Message 51 by Quetzal, posted 08-16-2006 10:38 PM | | Hyroglyphx has replied |
|
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 49 of 121 (340656)
08-16-2006 9:13 PM
|
Reply to: Message 46 by nator 08-16-2006 8:48 PM
|
|
Re: political correctness
Except, according to George Bush, if you are an Atheist. Atheists shouldn't be allowed to be citizens, according to him. When did he say that?
This message is a reply to: | | Message 46 by nator, posted 08-16-2006 8:48 PM | | nator has not replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 53 by crashfrog, posted 08-16-2006 10:50 PM | | Hyroglyphx has replied |
|
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 54 of 121 (340674)
08-16-2006 10:52 PM
|
Reply to: Message 51 by Quetzal 08-16-2006 10:38 PM
|
|
Re: political correctness
You are 100% correct. Interesting that you should mention the Hopi and Navajo. I'm originally from the southwest, and the bare tolerance between the two groups is noticeable. They have very different cultures, and don't even speak a language from the same language family (Navajo is Athabaskan, Hopi is an Uto-Azteca derivative). I learned early on not to make the mistake of lumping all indigenous groups into one collective pot. The Dineh (literally, "The People") would be extraordinarily insulted to be mistaken for the Hopituh (literally, "The Peaceful Ones"), and vice versa. In this context, "Indian" isn't any better than "Native American", IMO. The last placed I lived was just about 10 miles from the Navajo-Hopi Reservation which meant that there was a very high population of indigenous peoples. Both groups seem to dislike just about anyone not directly affiliated with their tribe, but I noticed even a more striking disparity between the two tribes. I also knew a Cherokee who moved onto that Rez and neither group treated him very well because he was an outsider. Certainly I knew their cultures were a bit different and their language was different, but I was under the assumption that the difference between Hopi and Navajo and were, perhaps, the difference between Cantonese and Mandarin. As you've elucidated, that isn't the case at all. And to even further show how Native Americans are extremely diverse, its my understanding that certain tribes do not come from Sino-asiatic blood, but rather, some share more DNA markers with Vikings. I can't recall which East Coast tribes those are, but I'm sure somebody will know what I'm talking about. “If chance be the father of all flesh then disaster is his rainbow in the sky. And when you hear of, state of emergencies, sniper kills ten, youths go looting, bomb blasts school, it is but the sound of man worshipping his maker” -Steve Turner
This message is a reply to: | | Message 51 by Quetzal, posted 08-16-2006 10:38 PM | | Quetzal has not replied |
|
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 55 of 121 (340675)
08-16-2006 10:55 PM
|
Reply to: Message 53 by crashfrog 08-16-2006 10:50 PM
|
|
Re: political correctness
In a news conference at Chicago O'Hare airport, Bush (Sr. is who we're talking about, BTW) addressed the entire nation: quote: : I don't know that atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots. This is one nation under God.
Well, that's not a good way to get re-elected. Stupid move.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 53 by crashfrog, posted 08-16-2006 10:50 PM | | crashfrog has not replied |
|