Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 59 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,925 Year: 4,182/9,624 Month: 1,053/974 Week: 12/368 Day: 12/11 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   On Judging Others
Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1475 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 6 of 121 (340365)
08-15-2006 6:00 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by robinrohan
08-15-2006 2:46 PM


The idea started with the Biblical "judge not lest ye be judged" but the word "judge" has some ambiguity and people are always extending it to mean things it was not intended to mean (ironically, in fact, often being judgmental of the judger in exactly the sense the teaching warns against), such as some of the things on your list.
In fact we ARE supposed to judge one another, to be able to discern right from wrong, to rebuke wrongs and so on -- but in a spirit of good will to the person, knowing we too can fall the same way. What the injunction against judging one another is about is putting oneself morally above another person, in a self-righteous spirit. Here's one commentator on it:
1. Judge not, that ye be not judged--To "judge" here does not exactly mean to pronounce condemnatory judgment, nor does it refer to simple judging at all, whether favorable or the reverse. The context makes it clear that the thing here condemned is that disposition to look unfavorably on the character and actions of others, which leads invariably to the pronouncing of rash, unjust, and unlovely judgments upon them. No doubt it is the judgments so pronounced which are here spoken of; but what our Lord aims at is the spirit out of which they spring. Provided we eschew this unlovely spirit, we are not only warranted to sit in judgment upon a brother's character and actions, but in the exercise of a necessary discrimination are often constrained to do so for our own guidance. It is the violation of the law of love involved in the exercise of a censorious disposition which alone is here condemned. And the argument against it--"that ye be not judged"--confirms this: "that your own character and actions be not pronounced upon with the like severity"; that is, at the great day.
Bible Search and Study Tools - Blue Letter Bible
{Edit: There are also verses that say we ARE to judge:
Lev 19:15 Ye shall do no unrighteousness in judgment: thou shalt not respect the person of the poor, nor honour the person of the mighty: [but] in righteousness shalt thou judge thy neighbour.
1Cr 5:12 For what have I to do to judge them also that are without? do not ye judge them that are within?
1Cr 6:2 Do ye not know that the saints shall judge the world? and if the world shall be judged by you, are ye unworthy to judge the smallest matters?
1Cr 6:3 Know ye not that we shall judge angels? how much more things that pertain to this life?
1Cr 6:5 I speak to your shame. Is it so, that there is not a wise man among you? no, not one that shall be able to judge between his brethren?
1Cr 11:31 For if we would judge ourselves, we should not be judged.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by robinrohan, posted 08-15-2006 2:46 PM robinrohan has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1475 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 7 of 121 (340367)
08-15-2006 6:15 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by robinrohan
08-15-2006 5:44 PM


Re: don't look like judgements to me
In ordinary conversation, it means an opinion about somebody. If somebody says, as people often do, "I try not to be judgmental about people," this does not mean,"I try not to assign punishment." It means that the person tries not to have negative opinions about people. That sounds nice, but it leads to hypocrisy. Judgments are inevitable. The world runs by judgments.
You are right, and some of these judgments are the kind that Jesus is teaching against, but many are of a sort that can't be avoided, are even necessary, as you say, yet people misapply that verse to them anyway.
The kind that Jesus is teaching against are the kind that MISjudge others, or apply harsh standards, or say gossipy mean things, or impute nasty motives instead of giving the benefit of the doubt and that sort of thing.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by robinrohan, posted 08-15-2006 5:44 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by robinrohan, posted 08-15-2006 6:18 PM Faith has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1475 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 12 of 121 (340581)
08-16-2006 5:57 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by robinrohan
08-16-2006 5:09 PM


Re: political correctness
It has a definite political agenda to it. It's not OK to offend people in wheelchairs or gay people or third world people or women or Muslims or Wiccans or any religious belief except Christianity, or black people "African Americans" or Indians "Native Americans" or any race but the white race, and conversely it's also correct to say as much against Christianity and white people, especially white men, and Israel as possible and to place all the evils in the world at their doorstep. Really, it goes back to the Marxist agenda against the West.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by robinrohan, posted 08-16-2006 5:09 PM robinrohan has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 14 by nator, posted 08-16-2006 6:00 PM Faith has replied
 Message 15 by Faith, posted 08-16-2006 6:15 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 22 by crashfrog, posted 08-16-2006 6:47 PM Faith has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1475 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 15 of 121 (340586)
08-16-2006 6:15 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by Faith
08-16-2006 5:57 PM


Re: political correctness, Berkeley style
Since I spent some years in Berkeley, one of the earliest cauldrons of political correctness, I experienced it before it became coin of the realm or the McPC now heard everywhere. One memory sticks in my mind of being in a store when a young man in a wheelchair accidentally bumped into me. Being a basically decent well-brought up fellow he apologized, and I said "No problem" and all was well UNTIL his very Berkeley Marxist Militant PC attendant, obviously there to train him in his Rights, counseled him furiously to "NEVER apologize to anyone EVER."
That's PC.
Another bizarre case of it in Berkeley was the conscious practice of pedestrians crossing the street against red lights, forcing cars to stop although they had the green light, this done on the political ground that cars were inhumane. This was usually in the vicinity of the university where the foot traffic was pretty intense.
That's PC.
The idea is to defend one group's supposed rights WHILE offending, demeaning and inconveniencing some other group, the Designated Oppressor Group, to the whitehot max.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by Faith, posted 08-16-2006 5:57 PM Faith has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1475 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 16 of 121 (340587)
08-16-2006 6:20 PM
Reply to: Message 14 by nator
08-16-2006 6:00 PM


Re: political correctness
What is the "white race"?
Well, you could ask that of Susan Sontag, famous leftie who wrote for the leftist Partisan Review, and is famous for denouncing the white race, but she died a couple years ago so you can't:
Writing in the 1960s about the Vietnam War, Sontag declared "the white Race is the cancer of human history." Days after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, she criticized U.S. foreign policy and offered backhanded praise for the hijackers.
In Memoriam Susan Sontag
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 14 by nator, posted 08-16-2006 6:00 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by nator, posted 08-16-2006 6:32 PM Faith has replied
 Message 32 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-16-2006 7:18 PM Faith has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1475 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 20 of 121 (340596)
08-16-2006 6:37 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by nator
08-16-2006 6:32 PM


Re: political correctness
It's a leftist PC concept. Ask them. I'm not a leftist.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by nator, posted 08-16-2006 6:32 PM nator has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1475 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 21 of 121 (340602)
08-16-2006 6:47 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by nator
08-16-2006 6:32 PM


Re: political correctness
Or, let me answer you this way: Your asking me what the white race is amounts to your own version of PC, by which you hope to nail me for accepting the term while you righteously huff about how there supposedly is no such thing as race.
That's PC for sure. The white race is considered to incorporate Europeans from Greece and the Balkans to Britain and France and Spain and from Italy to Scandinavia and Russia.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by nator, posted 08-16-2006 6:32 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by nator, posted 08-16-2006 8:34 PM Faith has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1475 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 25 of 121 (340606)
08-16-2006 6:51 PM
Reply to: Message 22 by crashfrog
08-16-2006 6:47 PM


Re: political correctness
It's the arrogance of the conservative, I guess; their arrogant assumption that the peoples of the world look to them to know what the hell they should call themselves.
Every people group on this planet has its own names for foreigners. Only modern western liberals get all pushed out of shape about the names westerners have historically had for foreigners.
{edit; If it were merely a correction of a mistake, the outraged moralistic attitude would not be there.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 22 by crashfrog, posted 08-16-2006 6:47 PM crashfrog has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 29 by crashfrog, posted 08-16-2006 7:03 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 45 by nator, posted 08-16-2006 8:42 PM Faith has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1475 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 50 of 121 (340663)
08-16-2006 9:51 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by nator
08-16-2006 8:34 PM


Re: political correctness
Gee, I thought my boundaries were pretty inclusive of all that but maybe not.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by nator, posted 08-16-2006 8:34 PM nator has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1475 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 52 of 121 (340670)
08-16-2006 10:45 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by MangyTiger
08-16-2006 9:13 PM


Re: political correctness
Thanks. The nitpicking does get to one.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by MangyTiger, posted 08-16-2006 9:13 PM MangyTiger has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by nator, posted 08-18-2006 10:17 AM Faith has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1475 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 62 of 121 (341059)
08-18-2006 11:24 AM
Reply to: Message 59 by nator
08-18-2006 10:17 AM


Re: no comment, faith? I am interested in what you have to say
The subject was such things as the mistaken term "Indians," not namecalling, or something like "Koran" for "Qur'an" and "Peking" for "Beijing." Liberal snootiness. {edit: There's even some of that liberal moralistic huffiness about the term "blacks" instead of the hyphenated divisive "African-Americans," despite the fact that it was a term chosen by black militants themselves.}
And now how about an acknowledgment of your error in Message 44.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 59 by nator, posted 08-18-2006 10:17 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by nator, posted 08-18-2006 2:42 PM Faith has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1475 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 67 of 121 (341123)
08-18-2006 3:34 PM
Reply to: Message 66 by nator
08-18-2006 3:27 PM


Re: The Error Schraf
There was nothing vague about my response. See Message 48 and Message 50. You misread my answer.
I defined the white race as European and I gave the boundaries of the area of their origin. I regard that area as definitive. But as usual you are merely changing the subject because what I think the white race is happens to be TOTALLY irrelevant. The topic is that strain of leftism that identifies the white race as the cancer of history and you need to ask THEM, not me.
And no, there is no excuse for the bullying tyrannical moralistic self-righteous tactics of PC, otherwise known as the Thought Police or Big Brother.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by nator, posted 08-18-2006 3:27 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 69 by nator, posted 08-18-2006 4:12 PM Faith has replied
 Message 72 by NosyNed, posted 08-18-2006 4:32 PM Faith has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1475 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 70 of 121 (341142)
08-18-2006 4:16 PM
Reply to: Message 69 by nator
08-18-2006 4:12 PM


Re: The Error Schraf
I do not want to discuss genetics. This is just irrelevant pedantry. Ask the leftists if they include Egyptians in the denunciation of the white race as the greatest evil on the planet and I would venture the guess that they don't. That is all that matters here.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 69 by nator, posted 08-18-2006 4:12 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 71 by nator, posted 08-18-2006 4:27 PM Faith has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1475 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 73 of 121 (341146)
08-18-2006 4:42 PM
Reply to: Message 72 by NosyNed
08-18-2006 4:32 PM


Re: White and european
Sorry but historically AND SPECIFICALLY WITH REFERENCE TO THE TOPIC UNDER DISCUSSION it is defined as European and I don't give a damn about the kind of "facts" you all make such a nitpicking big pedantic deal out of in your crabbed pinched and myopic manner here at EvC. On a COFFEE HOUSE thread about a PHILOSOPHICAL topic for crying out loud. Get real.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 72 by NosyNed, posted 08-18-2006 4:32 PM NosyNed has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 76 by nator, posted 08-18-2006 5:02 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 77 by crashfrog, posted 08-18-2006 5:06 PM Faith has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1475 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 74 of 121 (341148)
08-18-2006 4:46 PM
Reply to: Message 71 by nator
08-18-2006 4:27 PM


Re: The Error Schraf
Thank you for the totally gratuitous personal attack. In future I will try even harder to avoid you.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 71 by nator, posted 08-18-2006 4:27 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 75 by nator, posted 08-18-2006 5:01 PM Faith has not replied
 Message 78 by crashfrog, posted 08-18-2006 5:08 PM Faith has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024