Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,913 Year: 4,170/9,624 Month: 1,041/974 Week: 0/368 Day: 0/11 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   George W. Bush's qualifications to be President
paisano
Member (Idle past 6453 days)
Posts: 459
From: USA
Joined: 05-07-2004


Message 158 of 247 (138817)
09-01-2004 1:05 PM
Reply to: Message 132 by crashfrog
08-31-2004 11:17 AM


Re: Nobel Prize winners endorse Kerry
Americans have a weird relationship with the intellectual community; we respect intelligence and expertise but we love seeing eggheads find out that they're not as smart as they thought they were.
Well, in many cases, this is true. Noam Chomsky is one of the world's finest linguists, but his political ideas are unworthy of a sophomore level course in political science in sophistication. On the other end of the spectrum, William Shockley was a great solid state physicist, but his racist ideas, in addition to being repugnant, were equally irrational and sophomoric.
Excellence in a narrow field of academic study is evidence of...excellence in a narrow field of academic study.
Most human beings have a particular brand of irrationality they nurse. For some, it's fundamentalist religion, For others, fundamentalist atheism. For others, their political ideas. For others, a hobby.
Academics aren't immune. Peer review is only switched on in the journals and conferences.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 132 by crashfrog, posted 08-31-2004 11:17 AM crashfrog has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024